Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • FTMDave
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By FTMDave · Posted

      What you have uploaded is a letter with daft empty threats from third-party paper tigers.  Just ignore it. What we need to see is the original invoice you received last October or November.
    • gmlmonika
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By gmlmonika · Posted

      TERMINAL NOTICE.pdf
    • gmlmonika
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By gmlmonika · Posted

      Please find attached 
    • lookinforinfo
      NPC ANPR PCN Claimform - Taxi - Appealed - No Parking Or Waiting At Anytime - St Thomas Hospital, London, Se1 7eh.

      By lookinforinfo · Posted

      Thanks for posting the CPR contents. i do wish you hadn't blanked out the dates and times since at times they can be relevant . Can you please repost including times and dates. They say that they sent a copy of  the original  PCN that they sent to the Hirer  along with your hire agreement documents. Did you receive them and if so can you please upload the original PCN without erasing dates and times. If they did include  all the paperwork they said, then that PCN is pretty near compliant except for their error with the discount time. In the Act it isn't actually specified but to offer a discount for 14 days from the OFFENCE is a joke. the offence occurred probably a couple of months prior to you receiving your Notice to Hirer.  Also the words in parentheses n the Act have been missed off. Section 14 [5][c] (c)warn the hirer that if, after the period of 21 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to hirer is given, the amount of unpaid parking charges referred to in the notice to keeper under paragraph 8(2)(f) or 9(2)(f) (as the case may be) has not been paid in full, the creditor will (if any applicable requirements are met) have the right to recover from the hirer so much of that amount as remains unpaid; Though it states "if any applicable ...." as opposed to "if all applicable......" in Section 8 or 9. Maybe the Site could explain what the difference between the two terms mean if there is a difference. Also on your claim form they keeper referring to you as the driver or the keeper.  You are the Hirer and only the Hirer is responsible for the charge EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T THE DRIVER. So they cannot pursue the driver and nowhere in the Hirer section of the Act is the hirer ever named as the keeper so NPC are pursuing the wrong person.  
    • FTMDave
      PARKING FINE STANTED AIRPORT MCDONALDS

      By FTMDave · Posted

      This is simply a scam site.  It's been shown to be a scam in the national press and on national TV. Please fill in the the forum sticky and upload the invoice you've received. In fact what you have is an invoice, not a fine, a private company doesn't have the power to issue fines.  

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Harassment warning

l1awrie

By l1awrie
in General Legal Issues

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3650 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 186
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

l1awrie

l1awrie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The Mould great letter many thanks, makes all the points clearly.

 

I was fighting with my own letter, trying not to show my anger at once again being drawn into a situation which was not of my making.

 

I will scrap my own efforts and use your letter which is much more impressive.

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 6 months later...
l1awrie

l1awrie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Just to let you know that I raised a complaint with the police about the harassment notice which I recently chased up to be told it is being dealt with.

 

I now have another problem, hope somebody can I advise.

 

Same neighbour is parking on the right of way, despite having enough land of his own to park on.

 

Rasied the issue with the legal arm of my insurance company and was told that I had to write to the neighbour in the first place, which I did and received no response.

 

Sent legal people copies of the parking on the right of way and was told that because I do not drive at the moment, due to health problems, and I only have visitors once or twice a week I have less than a 51% chance of winning my case.

 

Why would I not win my case when the neighbours coventants state that the right of way must be left clear.

 

Also there is the effect this will have when I come to sell my house.

 

Any advice suggestions would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites
l1awrie

l1awrie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The parking does not occur occasionally the neighbour parks permantly on the right of way.

 

I, for medical reasons do not drive at the moment, but my visitors can not park on my property.

 

Selling the house will be difficult, covenants relating to both properties state that the right of way should be left clear.

 

This neighbour has more than enough room to park on his own property.

 

Neighbour also doesn't restrict his parking to the right of way but parks on my property to when the mood takes him.

Link to post
Share on other sites
unclebulgaria67

unclebulgaria67

Posted
Posted
The parking does not occur occasionally the neighbour parks permantly on the right of way.

 

I, for medical reasons do not drive at the moment, but my visitors can not park on my property.

 

Selling the house will be difficult, covenants relating to both properties state that the right of way should be left clear.

 

This neighbour has more than enough room to park on his own property.

 

Neighbour also doesn't restrict his parking to the right of way but parks on my property to when the mood takes him.

 

Get hold of some traffic cones or other notice to say no parking.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
l1awrie

l1awrie

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Parking cones will just be driven over.

 

I have written to him and asked him to keep the row clear but he just ignored the letter.

 

Might ask a friend to bring their van round and park it on my drive leaving him just enough room to get to his property.

 

I recently had to have the police out because he was on my property shouting up at my cctv, this from a man I have never met.

Link to post
Share on other sites
goodatresearch

goodatresearch

Posted
Posted

Insurance company is wrong. Whether you drive is not relevant. We have the same problem, beginning of drive is joint and for access only but next door and visitors not only block it but actually park on our drive and its obvious its our drive. Yes it has effected our ability to sell as they've done it during viewings and they've told us it put them off. It really annoys me when people tell us it doesn't matter and your not suffering any loss. We should be able to get on our property and should not have to put up with unwanted cars on our property.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
morgandlin

morgandlin

Posted
Posted
Just to let you know that I raised a complaint with the police about the harassment notice which I recently chased up to be told it is being dealt with.

 

I now have another problem, hope somebody can I advise.

 

Same neighbour is parking on the right of way, despite having enough land of his own to park on.

 

Rasied the issue with the legal arm of my insurance company and was told that I had to write to the neighbour in the first place, which I did and received no response.

 

Sent legal people copies of the parking on the right of way and was told that because I do not drive at the moment, due to health problems, and I only have visitors once or twice a week I have less than a 51% chance of winning my case.

 

Why would I not win my case when the neighbours coventants state that the right of way must be left clear.

 

Also there is the effect this will have when I come to sell my house.

 

Any advice suggestions would be appreciated.

 

You sound obsessed with parking, who is parking, how long they are parking and why they are parking!

 

Normal living requires give and take from neighbours with all things, and as all these arguments haven't helped, in the past, might it not be an idea to just calm down a bit, loosen up and try to get on with people?

 

Frankly, you sound a nightmare to live next door to, and all these disputes are what will affect you ever selling your house, simply because because all details have to be declared now, to any prospective buyer.

 

And, no, I wouldn't think you have too much chance of winning your case, either....you don't drive and you have infrequent visitors anyway!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
BRIGADIER2JCS

BRIGADIER2JCS

Posted
Posted

Is there no way of dividing "your" section of the drive, a couple of posts and a chain for instance?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...