Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

'Secured' Loan with WF - Desperately Need Help!!


Madison's Mummy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3894 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

Was hoping somebody could help me work out if my loan is unenforceable? There seems to be a lot of discrepancies on my paperwork. Really could do with advice.

 

I've also learned that WF have never placed a charge on the property.

 

I'm in arrears (last payment made in Jan 13) and am getting hounded by them.

 

Any help would be much appreciated.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. Can you provide as much info as you can on the loan, minus any personal info?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

A general outline of costs, charges, your issue, what has happened etc etc.

 

If you want to post documents, you need to make sure you edit out ALL identifying markers in paint, then convert the scanned image to PDF.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

The main thing to do right now though, is give us a description of what has happened. We can then advise on what info we need.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take as long as you need. We're all here to help.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, so basically I took out the secured loan in April 2008. The amount of credit was for £14,329.09 (initially it was for £12k but as I already had a loan with them the extra amount was to pay that off so it was settled). They also added a further £3,491.55 for Insurances so total is £17,814.64.

 

The insurances were for PPI (which I later reclaimed back), Homecare and Personal Accident Plan - I agreed to the PPI (under duress as I was told at the time if I didn't take it then I wouldn't get the loan). As far as the Homecare (£125.00) and Personal Accident Plan (£125.00) is concerned, I didn't agree to this and on my paperwork the boxes are ticked for not wanting them but WF added this on.

 

Before I claimed the PPI back I was paying £346.71 per month and this was being based on 180 months. After reclaiming the PPI my payments went down to £281.27. The APR (variable) was 25% and the rate of interest per annum was 24.6%. The interest charge is £44,358.45.

 

The balance at the start was £14,107.59 + 235.00 acceptance fee + £175.00 Personal Accident Plan + £125.00 Homecare 24 so that equals £14,642.59. I faithfully paid every month on time until this January where I struggled to make payments as my husband lost his job. (I took this loan out before I even met my husband).

 

I have a few statements from WF but there are discrepancies in them. The 28/03/09 - 28/03/10 statement says the amounts I paid to them each month was £346.71 which was correct. But the statement for period 16/04/08 - 31/05/13 says the amount I paid was £281.27 which is incorrect as I started paying the lower amount when I won my PPI case with them which was in December 2011.

 

The amounts of credit on both statements differ also - the 28/03/09 - 28/03/10 statement says amount of credit provided is £18,049.64 and the 16/04/08 - 31/05/13 statement says £14,642.59.

 

Hopefully I have provided all the info you need but if not, please let me know. It is really confusing me.

 

Also, as I said before, there is no charge on my property. I checked this out with the Land & Registry Office and paid for papers to prove this. I live in Northern Ireland.

 

WF are hounding my by phone. I said to the guy I was speaking to that there is no charge on the property and he said it was an administrative error which can be easily fixed! Is this even possible?

 

Really hoping you can help me!

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

With the PPI reclaim, did you get all of it PLUS extra interest at the rate they charged you?

 

Ignore them on the phone. If they catch you out, just say In writing please. I do not deal with financial situations over the phone. Then hang up. As you have found out already, they will say anything to try and scare you into giving them money.

 

You then need to SAR welcome and get the complete facts about the account.

 

Regarding the land registry, a charge is only put on your property if you have been taken to court and the court allows it. Otherwise, theres just a marker that says a loan is secured.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't remember about the PPI. Empire claims dealt with it for me. I definitely didn't get as much as £3,191.55 - I think I got £2,000-something??

 

I should have said in my last post that I did SAR them (at least I sent off £1 postal order requesting info on my account). First of all they said I needed to confirm who I was before they sent me info to which I replied that was nonsense as they have had no issue sending me info in the post before. They then sent me a copy of the agreement I signed. All of this was completed outside the timescale allowed.

 

As far as the Land Registry is concerned, there's no indication on my property that a secured loan is in place.

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

SO you didnt get all the PPI back. They took 1/3 of it for themselves plus the interest as well.

 

A SAR costs £10. A CCA costs £1.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It must have been the CCA I got. Although with that they must have sent me a statement covering the whole period as that's the one which has the wrong info re my payments each month is concerned.

 

So once I've done the SAR and get the info back, what's the next step? And how do I handle them in the meantime? I have received a few default notices in the post and they've updated my credit file to say default.

 

Many thanks again for your advice:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...