Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Has anyone ever been hit with a £99 engineer visit fee?


flynnsmum123
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3902 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

i had an engineer visit on the 29th july for my broadband, all he did was check the caballing was correct and replace the superhub and left only for me to find out i had no internet at all because he set it up wrong

 

jump forward today,cut off because im over my credit limit because of a £99 fee for his visit? i wasnt told of this when i phoned or i wouldn't have booked a visit because i can't afford it but the notes on my account supposedly say i was told.

 

so ill have no service for 2weeks because they want £200 to put my services back on and i don't get paid for another 2 weeks,(my bill isn't due til 11th sept) but of course i'll be charged for these 2 weeks service i didn't use.

 

ive just written a 4 n a half page complaint letter since thats the only way they will investigate a complaint or thats what i was told anyway.

 

i am livid!

 

come november i am off back to sky,they don't have as good internet etc but i never had appalling service like that with them.

 

anyone else heard of or had this fee? who else can i contact?

 

TIA

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the engineer replaced the Superhub that would indicate that there was a fault with their equipment so not sure how they can charge? Does the Superhub belong to you and is it under warranty? As you had no service after he left, obviously he did something wrong. How was this rectified?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the engineer replaced the Superhub that would indicate that there was a fault with their equipment so not sure how they can charge? Does the Superhub belong to you and is it under warranty? As you had no service after he left, obviously he did something wrong. How was this rectified?

 

i assumed he replaced the superhub because that was part of the problem but nothings changed. the equipment is theirs,we just rent so if anything is broken it gets replaced for free. he didn't set the superhub up correctly to receive the signal from the d-link modem so that was another phonecall to tech support. lost count the amount of times ive spoken to them over the course of 6ish months.

 

i asked on the phone this morning what the £99 actually covers,is it just for the engineer to visit me or for work carried out and i was told it would be for relocating boxes,re-wiring things like that. im going to phone again for clarification why someone would be charged for the visit.

 

i was under the impression that engineer visits were free,thats what i was told when i joined anyway and was part of the reason i left sky,i couldn't risk a £60 fee if one of the kids wrecked the boxes

Link to post
Share on other sites

i assumed he replaced the superhub because that was part of the problem but nothings changed. the equipment is theirs,we just rent so if anything is broken it gets replaced for free. he didn't set the superhub up correctly to receive the signal from the d-link modem so that was another phonecall to tech support. lost count the amount of times ive spoken to them over the course of 6ish months.

 

i asked on the phone this morning what the £99 actually covers,is it just for the engineer to visit me or for work carried out and i was told it would be for relocating boxes,re-wiring things like that. im going to phone again for clarification why someone would be charged for the visit.

 

i was under the impression that engineer visits were free,thats what i was told when i joined anyway and was part of the reason i left sky,i couldn't risk a £60 fee if one of the kids wrecked the boxes

If it is rented and you did not cause any damage, there is no ways they should be charging you. Although I have my moments with Sky, over the past 6 months we have had several visits, but have never been charged a call out fee. If I knew I had to pay for repairs to faulty rented equipment, I would drop the service and look elsewhere.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get on Twitter and complain. Bet they sort it.

 

do they have twitter? i'd have no idea how go on the offensive in 140 characters. any tips?

 

If it is rented and you did not cause any damage, there is no ways they should be charging you. Although I have my moments with Sky, over the past 6 months we have had several visits, but have never been charged a call out fee. If I knew I had to pay for repairs to faulty rented equipment, I would drop the service and look elsewhere.

 

im on the phone trying to get clarification now but i've had to explain like 5 times already why im calling and he just doesn't get it so i don't expect an answer.

 

guessing the isn't a virgin media rep on here?

Link to post
Share on other sites

found this as a bit of an explanation,stlll dont get it.

 

http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Other-Queries/Engineer-fee-for-fitting-router/td-p/1444970/page/2

 

its their equipment, under warranty which shouldn't matter as its theirs not a third party. im lost. tweeted them so will see what reply i get

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...