Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks very much Bank. I have topped and tailed my LOC and printed off a copy which I shall post tomorrow by First Class post at my local post office and also obtain a proof of postage. I'll also email them a copy. I've opened a MoneyClaim account, and shall now begin work on my draft Particulars of Claim which I shall post here for your thoughts. And I shan't be using the Moderation service.
    • Yes, it struck me this morning that I'd got it wrong    - no involvement of UKPPO in any previous Tesco thread    - there would have been an entrance sign to a Tesco car park    - CCTV isn't something associated with Tesco car parks. Presumably whoever runs the car park has put CCTV at the electric, and probably BB, areas, done absolutely nothing to stop abuse, and then rubs their hands in glee every time the CCTV catches a motorist out. You can pay £60 and this will go away. Or you can defy UKPPO and rely on their non-respect of POFA, consideration period, etc., should they be daft enough to do court later down the line.  We would support you all the way.
    • thats not the way to do it sorry. sorry so what is your problem? that vanquis paid the £560 or that they are now chasing it? how old is this debt? dx  
    • If you visited Qatar you could be detained at the border, if the debt has been notified.  If you are only in transit and do not seek to cross border into Qatar you might be ok, but you may want to seek formal advice about this.
    • Howdy, I had a short lived credit card with Vanquis that I did not need. I paid it off in full and called them and closed it with the person at the other end. 2 months later they started sending me messages about late payments, I called them and to find out that the card had not been closed in error and 6 weeks after it should have been closed they paid a google debit of £560. I hit the roof and made a formal complaint that took them well over a month to respond to. They agreed they were at fault, refunded all late payments fees and offered me £100 in compensation. However they said the debit amount stood as 'I had benefit from it' and I should get a refund from google. I hit the roof again but they have stuck to their guns. The debit from google is a genuine one but I wanted to dispute it with google so closed the card so they would have to engage with me. But surely that's neither here nor there surely? What is the next step? Ombudsman takes forever doesn't it?  thanks in advance
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Pre-default payment plan advice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

A very close family member has asked me to arrange a pre-default payment plan with 2 PDL company's, as they are in serious financial difficulties and need to maintain their priority debts etc. PDLs namely:

1)CFO Lending

2)Wage day Advance

.

I have spoken to Barclay's Bank this evening on their behalf as the initial info they were given by Barclay's was an absolute distortion of the facts re the cancellation, of the cancellation of recurring transactions/continuous payment authority regs, as per the "Financial Conduct Authority Regs"

 

I actually thought I was talking to a representative of a PDLco. I wonder if they have slipped a few covert operators into Barclays??:!:

 

The Barclay's rep I spoke to eventually and apologetically confirmed that my protestations were correct and that the call taker previous, had mis-interpreted the situation and the appropriate action for cancellation, would be initiated immediately.

 

We will be going into the local branch of Barclay's first thing tomorrow to deposit a letter for signature and proof of request to cancel the above recurring transactions / continuous payment authority and that no payments in any form, are to be made from their acc.

 

Could the Caggers with the experience of dealing with the above PDL comps, please assist in the formulating of the letter to send re the request to set up a pre-default payment plan.

 

All advice/info will as usual be very gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to secure the banka ccount first and get FULL written confirmation that no payments will be allowed to those lenders or their merchants. THAT is the main priority. The two PDL's you have listed are well known for taking money from peoples accounts once they know you are about to default.

 

There is no need for a template to converse with the DCA's. Just say something along the lines of " im currently experiencing financial difficulties which means i will not be able to meet the payments as agreed on my loan. I will however be able to make the following payments and at these intervals. Please find enclosed a copy of my budget summary. As a gesture of goodwill by yourselves, i would appreciate it if you could refrain from adding on any interest or charges on to the account as it would do nothing to help me or my situation".

 

Always start politely and positively, then if they start to get cocky, we can ramp up the letters and play hardball with them. Also, the letters should be send by Recorded delivery, not email. It is known for emails to go "missing" and for the lender to claim nothing was received. If you send it by Recorded delivery, then they cant say a thing.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi JGJ,

 

WageDayAdvance is not too difficult to get to setup a repayment plan. In my case they set one up over 8 months. But beware, even though a repayment plan was setup and even though the CPA was cancelled WageDayAdvance continued to setup a new Direct Debit with my bank every month 2 days before payday for the full amount (which I cancelled every month 1 day before payday of course :-)). So this is something to watch closely on your account in the future (as CPA (which uses the card number) is different to Direct Debit (which uses the account number).

 

CFO Lending is more difficult to setup repayment plan, but not impossible. Also here beware, as they might try everything to fish for your card details. Always pay by standing order to their bank account.

24/7 Moneybox: 195.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

British Pearl/Spondoolies: 752.10 - Oustanding: 0.00

Cash on go/Peachy: 206.30 - Oustanding: 0.00

EarlyPayday: 325.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

Lending Stream: 1398.46 - Oustanding: 0.00

MicroLend: 780.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

Minicredit: 520.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

MonthEndMoney/PaydayUK: 937.50 - Oustanding: 0.00

MrLender: 715.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

Pounds2Pocket: 2328.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

QuickQuid: 1800.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

SafeLoans: 450.50 - Oustanding: 0.00

Speed-E-Loans: 516.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

SwiftSterling: 1295.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

Toothfairy Finance: 544.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

TxtLoan: 450.00 - Oustanding: 0.00

WageDayAdvance: 670.80 - Oustanding: 0.00

Wonga: 1336.86 - Oustanding: 0.00

Total: 15220.52 - Oustanding: 0.00

Link to post
Share on other sites

renegadeimp,

 

Do you think that adding a paragraph to the letter, stating that I will only communicate with you in writing and that it is my" Legal Right" to communicate with you in writing, under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

 

Or will I await their response to the shorter version.

 

All advise/info will as usual be gratefully received.

 

"EXEMPLO DUCEMUS"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont put the human rights bit in. It has no bearing on it.

 

Have a read of http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?493-Harassment-by-telephone-response-letter

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...