Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please monitor this thread for a reply later today
    • Plans for the Mitsubishi SpaceJet have been frozen due to budget cuts amid the virus downturn. View the full article
    • your right to reject has not been affected. at the very least you now have moved into the 6 months period where under the Consumer Rights Act you are entitled to give a single opportunity to repair after which you are entitled to reject the vehicle. maybe it will be a good idea to provide them with a letter to make  clear your position and what will happen if the whole matter isn't completely sorted out.   If that appeals to you then you might like to draft a letter and post it here and we can have a look. I think it's a good idea to state your position clearly so that nobody is in any doubt.   in terms of your part exchange vehicle, if you reject your new car then they will be obliged to refund you the entire asking price of it. In other words they will be obliged to substitute a money value for your old vehicle.   it might be worth stating that as well in your letter for clarity. I would suggest that in the intervening time it would be worth making a list of all the losses that you have suffered as a result of this situation and then if it looks like a worthwhile figure then we can help you claim it back            
    • Morning dx its signed, will post a picture when I get back from work what they sent her and have a read of some of the thteads you mentioned.
    • Why do I get the feeling that national lockdown no.2. will happen, but Government are delaying the decision for as long as possible ?   Is this so lockdown no.2 is timed for mid/late November ? With the hope virus numbers are then reducing by mid December, so the lockdown can be removed in the run up to Christmas ?   Bit of a risky strategy ?      
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Millions of motorists face £100 FINES when new laws come into effect on FRIDAY !!


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2550 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I personally am glad the these new laws have come in to effect.

 

What new laws? I repeat my earlier thread, it is not the legislation that has changed (the offences have always been there) it is simply the way it will be enforced!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

They really need to come down harder across the entire board. Not just motorways

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
In respect of retesting, it was seriously considered a few years ago, and I remember it clearly because I was one of a number of advanced examiners who were approached and asked if we would be interested in becoming re-test examiners as the logistics would place too much strain on the existing system as the DSA examiners would not be able to cope with the extra work load.

 

Then someone in Government pointed out that making drivers sit a re-test every 5 or 10 years would be a guaranteed vote loser, and so it was quickly and quietly dropped.

Damn democracy!!!

 

They really need to come down harder across the entire board. Not just motorways

Unfortunately, democratic government cant make such hard choices.

 

I do like my freedom of speech, but I can see that totalitarianism does have some practical advantages (I'm not saying I agree with it - don't come round my house with burning pitch forks, I respect human rights too)

Link to post
Share on other sites

In view of the 100 car pile up in Kent this morning, if I come across a thick bank of fog I must admit I would think that using the middle lane will be the safer option. I have seen what two HGVs can do to a car that is crushed between them.

The car was travelling slowly in the slow lane when a HGV caught up with it and rear ended it and pushed it into the HGV in front who was also travelling slowly due to fog!

Link to post
Share on other sites
In view of the 100 car pile up in Kent this morning, if I come across a thick bank of fog I must admit I would think that using the middle lane will be the safer option. I have seen what two HGVs can do to a car that is crushed between them.

The car was travelling slowly in the slow lane when a HGV caught up with it and rear ended it and pushed it into the HGV in front who was also travelling slowly due to fog!

 

That accident was majority caused by people driving through the fog ( get ready for this) with NO LIGHTS. Seriously. Those types of drivers should be banned for life.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
In view of the 100 car pile up in Kent this morning, if I come across a thick bank of fog I must admit I would think that using the middle lane will be the safer option. I have seen what two HGVs can do to a car that is crushed between them.

The car was travelling slowly in the slow lane when a HGV caught up with it and rear ended it and pushed it into the HGV in front who was also travelling slowly due to fog!

 

So you are a driver that still refers to slow lane, middle lane and fast lane? There is no such thing. We have a left hand driving lane and 2 overtaking lanes, and that is all they are "Overtaking lanes"!

 

Lane 1 (The left hand driving lane) is 99% of the time the safer option as you have the hard shoulder as your escape route, but by using the middle lane leaves you with very few options.

 

Anyone remember the big pile up on the M4 in 1991 when 25 burnt to death? I was first on scene and watched all of them burn alive (not a pretty sight) because our fire extinguishers were no match for the blaze. The majority of those who died were in the middle lane simply because they treated it as a cruising lane.

 

Had they used lane 1 which was empty, many of them would still be alive today.

 

So sorry, I have to refute your argument.

 

I conducted an advanced test the other day. Driver got most upset when I failed him because we travelled for over 4 miles in the middle lane when the inside lane was empty. True he was given bad instruction as well, but as an experienced driver he was actually quite embarrassed, but given the views expressed by many on this particular subject, it goes to prove that there is a serious lack of understanding and knowledge in respect of Motorway driving.

 

Spend 24 hours working the Motorway and opinions would soon change, but some drivers really do need some serious re-education!

Link to post
Share on other sites

TC just to enlighten you, I passed my advanced driving licence many years ago when I served in the police force as I drove pursuit cars. That test is far more stringent that any advanced driving test available to the general public.

If one refers to the inside, middle and outside lane many people are confused, but using the terms "slow, middle and fast lane" every one understands however if you wish to be pedantic that is your option.

BTW if the driver you failed was taught by an advanced driving instructor, that instructor should have their advanced driving licence revoked!

Link to post
Share on other sites
TC just to enlighten you, I passed my advanced driving licence many years ago when I served in the police force as I drove pursuit cars. That test is far more stringent that any advanced driving test available to the general public.

If one refers to the inside, middle and outside lane many people are confused, but using the terms "slow, middle and fast lane" every one understands however if you wish to be pedantic that is your option.

BTW if the driver you failed was taught by an advanced driving instructor, that instructor should have their advanced driving licence revoked!

 

I am fully aware of the requirements of the Police advanced standard, I qualified as an instructor during my service, and I have been an advanced examiner for over 30 years.

 

But now that you have taught me to suck eggs and revealed your background, it is shameful that in one sentence you undo a lot of work done by many others in trying to educate the motoring public in Motorway driving by returning to phrases and descriptions that have never existed. You of all people should know better, and yes call it pedantic if you wish, but when it comes to driver education, there is no half measures, and you of all people should know better.

 

And in respect of the tutor who taught the test candidate, yes, he was reported to his group, and again given your background you of all people should know that there is no such thing as an advanced licence!!!! :roll:

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
I think you are now being very childish and showing your immaturity!

 

Fine, think as you wish, but for someone who is supposed to be as qualified and as experienced as you claim, then you should take a good look at yourself, because it is people like you that do more damage than those less fortunate to have gone through the training that you claim you have done, and should know better.

 

Pot calling the kettle black springs to mind, but in any case I am not going to enter into a slagging match on a public forum with someone like you, as it is clearly you that is being childish with your lame comments and observations. Just a shame I cannot block people like you.

Link to post
Share on other sites
if I come across a thick bank of fog I must admit I would think that using the middle lane will be the safer option. I have seen what two HGVs can do to a car that is crushed between them.

As a police trained driver you should know better, as T.C. says.

 

I would feel safer in the left lane, as in fog I prefer to drive at a speed where I can stop within the distance I can see ahead (although that's difficult to judge so I probably go faster than that), and there's too many superheros in the middle and right lanes who have X-ray vision. Also, I'm closer to the hard shoulder if the need arises. Although even then, if I needed to stop to avoid an accident I'd prefer the grass on the other side of the hard shoulder, better still, in thick fog where people have already crashed I'd be trying to get my 4x4 up an embankment behind a tree.

 

I'm not a nervous person, and I have had many speeding tickets in my time, its only fog on a motorway makes me paranoid.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just a shame I cannot block people like you.

 

User CP > Edit Ignore list.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

 

If I am driving in the middle lane at say 70 mph, than what right people behind me have legally to go faster, so if I am breaking the highway rule by hogging the lane than anybody who wants to go faster is also breaking the law, which says you are not allowed to go over 70 mph on the motorway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I am driving in the middle lane at say 70 mph, than what right people behind me have legally to go faster, so if I am breaking the highway rule by hogging the lane than anybody who wants to go faster is also breaking the law, which says you are not allowed to go over 70 mph on the motorway.

 

That's the sort of attitude that deserves a FPN for driving without due care and consideration. Although technically you are correct, ACPO guidelines suggest allowing 10%+2mph for people breaking the speed limit.

 

It would be interesting to see if ACPO produce some guidelines on length of time in the middle lane, distance from a vehicle in the left lane, and whether or not there is a requirement for another vehicle to need to use the right lane to circumnavigate the inconsiderate so and so's.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But then if you are going above 70 mph then you are also driving without due care and attention and be served with penalty notice.

Why is it that it is OK for someone when they are speeding and putting other people in danger, and being reckless, but a person who is just driving at the max speed allowed, must be dealt with punity.

Double standard I think.

Link to post
Share on other sites
But then if you are going above 70 mph then you are also driving without due care and attention and be served with penalty notice.

Why is it that it is OK for someone when they are speeding and putting other people in danger, and being reckless, but a person who is just driving at the max speed allowed, must be dealt with punity.

Double standard I think.

Speeding and driving without due care are seperate offences. You can commit one crime without the other or both at the same time.

 

Your attitude implies that you dont believe you are breaking the law, and that obstructing the highway is perfectly safe, which it most certainly is not. By infuriating your fellow criminals (by which I mean the speeders) you are more likely to cause them to make mistakes and that endagers people's lives a lot more than they do by just going a few mph too fast.

 

To demonstrate the difference in attitude: the last time I was handed a FPN for speeding, when asked "Do you have anything to say ..." I genuinely replied "It's a fair cop guv". (It made the officer laugh.)

 

Remember "Speed does not kill" - 95.7% of accidents are NOT attributable to excess speed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If I am driving in the middle lane at say 70 mph, than what right people behind me have legally to go faster, so if I am breaking the highway rule by hogging the lane than anybody who wants to go faster is also breaking the law, which says you are not allowed to go over 70 mph on the motorway.

 

So what are you trying to prove by driving in the middle lane at 70? Are you trying to 'police' the speed limit? If so, why not go the whole hog by sitting in the third (or outside) lane and stick to 70?

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

Link to post
Share on other sites
So what are you trying to prove by driving in the middle lane at 70? Are you trying to 'police' the speed limit? If so, why not go the whole hog by sitting in the third (or outside) lane and stick to 70?

Don't tempt him! He's the sort of person that would!

 

If he wants to police the speed limit, then encourage him to join the police force. He'd soon learn that there are many more serious offences than speeding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If I am driving in the middle lane at say 70 mph, than what right people behind me have legally to go faster, so if I am breaking the highway rule by hogging the lane than anybody who wants to go faster is also breaking the law, which says you are not allowed to go over 70 mph on the motorway.

 

What if you catch up with another idiot doing 69 ? . Do you flash your lights and tailgate him, undertake or crawl past him in the correct lane?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...