Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Former billionaire Hui Ka Yan has been fined and banned from the financial market for life.View the full article
    • In terms of "why didn't I make a claim" - well, that has to be understood in the context of the long-standing legal battle and all its permuations with the shark. In essence there was a repo and probable fire sale of the leasehold property - which would have led to me initiating the complaint/ claim v SPF in summer 19. But there was no quick sale. And battle commenced and it ain't done yet 5y later. A potential sale morphed into trying to do a debt deal and then into a full blown battle heading to trial - based on the shark deliberately racking up costs just so the ceo can keep the property for himself.  Along the way they have launched claims in 4 different counties -v- me - trying to get a backdoor B. (Haven't yet succeeded) Simultaneously I got dragged into a contentious forfeiture claim and then into a lease extension debacle - both of which lasted 3y. (I have an association with the freeholders and handled all that legal stuff too) I had some (friend paid for) legal support to begin with.  But mostly I have handled every thing alone.  The sheer weight of all the different cases has been pretty overwhelming. And tedious.  I'm battling an aggressive financial shark that has investors giving them 00s of millions. They've employed teams of expensive lawyers and barristers. And also got juniors doing the boring menial tasks. And, of course, in text book style they've delayed issues on purpose and then sent 000's of docs to read at the 11th hour. Which I not only boringly did read,  but also simultaneously filed for ease of reference later - which has come in very handy in speeding up collating legal bundles and being able to find evidence quickly.  It's also how I found out the damning stuff I could use -v- them.  Bottom line - I haven't really had a moment to breath for 5y. I've had to write a statement recently. And asked a clinic for advice. One of the volunteers asked how I got into this situation.  Which prompted me to say it all started when I got bad advice from a broker. Which kick-started me in to thinking I really should look into making some kind of formal complaint -v- the broker.  Which is where I am now.  Extenuating circumstances as to why I'm complaining so late.  But hopefully still in time ??  
    • At a key lecture in the City of London, the shadow chancellor will also vow to reform the Treasury.View the full article
    • Despite controversy China's Temu is becoming a global online shopping force.View the full article
    • The retailer has come under fire for an advert showing motorcyclists wearing trainers and doing wheelies.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Court Directions and Default Notice - AK & old EGG debt


elrib
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3459 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

We are going to need a lot more information. Obtaining a "set aside" just means that the debt is disputed and thus a SD cannot be used until the court has adjudicated on the debt, it is not a final decision on whether the debt is due and does not stop them from bringing proceedings to recover it.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
  • Replies 115
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi All

 

Due in court soon, Have couple of question if anyone can help.

 

1, Had order from court for direction, first one was for document list which had to be presented to claimant by 28th July, and to myself from them. which I did, But the claimant did not keep to the date and I received their list 12 days later and it was dated 10 days after as well, I did in the mean time write to the court who said I would have to fill in a 244 form, But now that the list has been sent is there any point in this or anything I could do at court.

 

2, I never received a default notice. and have asked for this a few times so I could check it conforms to the legal requirements, It now appears that they do not have one and are saying that by sending a Template of what one would have look like, that this would be good enough for them to confirm I had one as the banks have to follow strict rules and don,t make mistakes,

Is there a regulation on default notice or case study, and can they get away with this.

 

thanks

Elrib

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Elrib

 

Point 1 yes you should have made application and requested the court impose sanctions for failing to follow the directions CPR.3.Sooo the court are still aware as you advised but you did miss an opportunity to strike out.

As this impacted on anything further within the directions....Witness Statement prep etc?

 

Point 2 Creditors are not required to archive hard copy DNs as long as they can verify from their internal systems that one was sent and what date any breach occurred.A reconstituted version will suffice in most cases....however this must be accurate on data and service time.

 

Not knowing what type of account is involved in your case its important to understand that a DN is not issued for a current account but a recall termination noticed served under sections 76 (1) and 98 (1) of the CCA1974.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks andyorch

 

I only got reply back from court ref n244 day before letter from DCA. so I will bring it up in the court.

 

As for the DN they have confirmed that they do not have one, But say that a template with no info on like dates, names etc, would do to show the court what one would have look like, This is for a credit card.

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

No if the account was defaulted by the original creditor then the debt cannot be defaulted again.

 

Explain a little more please there may be more relevant advice

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply Brigadier

 

I understand that they can,t default me again,

 

But the issue is that no default notice was ever sent,

 

They took it to court on a statuary demand which was set aside due to no Default notice,

 

since then they have informed me that they will just issue another Default notice which would allow them to take me back to court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok would this have to come from the original lender who terminated the agreement prior to selling on.

 

or from the DCA which bought it.

 

this goes back to 2005 so there is not alot of info like what the arrears were at the time the default was put on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Once an agreement has been terminated, then it no longer exists, so the adding of interest/fees/charges to it are unfair, how can they add interest to an agreement that doesn't exist?

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

tell us the story of the debt please

 

 

and name names

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is this your link debt

or the egg one please

 

 

try not to KEEP

 

 

making new threads when you have one already running for the debt.

 

 

I've just merged 32 threads on two debts you have.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Courts are know to allow a complaint DN to be issued even when action has been started.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for that will try and keep things in order.

 

This is an old Egg agreement back to 2005 for approx 5.5K.

 

Default put I my credit file in 2006 and agreement terminated,

 

I was not aware of this at the time as I was still sending and receiving letters from Egg who said they were looking into my complaint.

 

After a few other DCA and more letters Aktiv then appeared and said that they have now purchased the debt.

 

So again started all letters again.

 

Then late in 2012 they took me to court for a Statuary Demand which was set aside and

they went off in a huff leaving me with their bill for cost of 2K which they could,t have..

My Defense was Agreement did not conform and no DN sent.

 

Then more letters sent back and forward, and then they took me back to court again.

 

This time they came with barrister and witnesses so they meant business.

 

my defense was the same as before Non conforming Agreement which Judge did not accept,

and No DN sent or received which the Judge did Accept and Dismissed Aktiv Claim.

 

off they went again leaving me again with their Bill for costs at 5K this time which they could,t have. and went off in a bigger Huff.

 

I am sure that they will not leave it there, and they said that they will look to send DN and will take me back to court.

 

The Judge was not sure if they could or could do that, with out looking at what the law say.

 

That,s where I am and now looking to find info on what they can do when agreement has been terminated

with regard to sending out new DN as they are not the original lender.

 

E.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was the claim struck out elrib...how did the Judge resolve the matter?

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dismissed ? did you recieve any final General Order N24 does it state dismissed or struck out? There is a world of difference for the advice I would offer subject to how it was concluded.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well to be honest I wouldn't worry until they (if) issue a further claim.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the original claim was dismissed - then my understanding is that any further action would be a fresh claim commenced at the date of issue.

 

When was the last payment / acknowledgement of liability on the account.

 

Is it potentially more than 6 years ago ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was terminated in 2006 ,

but not sure if I made any token payments after that I will have to check to see if I did.

 

But I guess a token payment would be acknowledgement of the debt.

 

E

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...