Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
    • Well naturally if you want to maintain your outrage, and retain something to bitch about, then arguing about the level of your fixed monthly DD is the way to go. You are of course perfectly free to ignore the easy solution.
    • His financial situation isn’t great, and the landlord has made lots of things up. The things he’s put isn’t true at all. My friend did tell the full truth with incoming and outgoing, I helped him fill in his form and he checked bills etc. to make sure it was right. His wage is ok, but not as good as the landlord thinks it is,  and he doesn’t have anything spare. How much are they likely to take from him? Should he send any reply?  the letter just says to take the court letter with him. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Lloyds PPI, Upheld but Rejected


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3903 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Readers

 

After doing a little digging,

I found out I had 4 loans with Lloyds TSB from 1988 to 2003 which had PPI,

 

all 4 loans total was £29,000 for varying amounts.

 

Unfortunately I didnt have the original documents however my local branch had the total amount I had borrowed

& the length the loans ran which was actually the full term of the loan.

 

I sent Lloyds the relevant documentation to complain about mis selling of PPI,

they replied & informed me that the PPI was not mis-sold.

I took the case to the FOS & in no time my case was upheld.

 

I received a letter from Lloyds with an offer of £4,800 stating it was a good will gesture & that they were not liable for mis-selling of PPI,

they also said it was an average payout without me having original documentation & that Lloyds also did not keep the original documents as it was more than 7 years.

 

I declined their offer & challenged it as feel Lloyds did not follow the FOS guidelines of simple interest from the start of the loan to the current day ( I believe its 8% per year)?

 

The FOS has acted in my favour again & upheld it a second time, informing Lloyds to follow their guidelines.

 

However i am not sure if Lloyds will try & fob me off with some silly offer or will they really apply the FOS guidelines of reimbursement?

 

How can a bank not admit liability but still offer you £4800 as a good will gesture?

Im still waiting for a 2nd offer from Lloyds!

 

Any help appreciated!

 

Thanks

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

my local branch had the total amount I had borrowed & the length the loans ran which was actually the full term of the loan.

 

I would get down to your branch and get a print out of that information...it will be useful to you if you have to challenge Lloyds again .

 

Strange that the branch can access this data but the PPI department say they don't keep records that far back. Another fob off by the looks of things.

 

The gesture of goodwill and non admission of liability is standard....don't get hung up about the terminology.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds are trying to wash their hands saying that because I did not have any of the original documentation they were unable to calculate the interest or PPI paid by myself, however with a little research its easy to obtain interest figures by banks from 1988 to 2003! My calculations were in excess of £10,000 using the guidelines set by the FOS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats just it, all evidence I had was from my local branch, they did not have original contracts but gave me all the printouts of how much I borrowed & how long the loans lasted for, I used this evidence when I rejected their good will offer & gave it to the FOS to review, since then its been upheld again, but im waiting to hear back with an offer from Lloyds. When I call them for information they are so unhelpful!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is easy to find generic rates that were being charged but of course we must remember that it is the rate that was specifically charged on your account(s) which is important.

 

What you would be due back is each payment made towards the PPI and the contractual interest on those payments plus 8% simple on each of those. This 8% simple runs from the date of the actual payment up to the date of settlement.

 

You would really need the details from the agreement (Cash Loan and PPI Loan) and a record of the repayments actually made in order to calculate the refund due correctly.

 

The item at No.1 in my signature has more information.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

£1200 per loan claim is Lloyds std figure

 

if you cant prove what you paid and when you paid it.

 

I've had 2 sets of SAR's from Lloyds giving info back passed 2000

on other claims

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...