Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help urgent bailiffs notice addressee doesn't live here *RESOLVED*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This is the first letter I have had here for him in a long time, years no one has knocked here and I am sure of that because I'm always in with the exception of hospital visits

 

- Oh this bloody child and proof of my disability is easy - This is demanding money with menaces surely as I am not the debtor

 

I've typed up an email to court and have sent one to Collecctica maybe I should phone the court too

 

No because they are not demanding money from you. You must understand they are looking(if its a magi fine) for a criminal, and not all criminals, or their parents are gods honest upstanding memebrs of the community. You will be viewed with suspicion BUT most ea's will not mess you around and will prob walk away with a copy of the council tax bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Do you live on your own, and have claimed the single person's council tax discount? If so a copy of the council tax bill showing the discount would be sufficient to show he doesn't live with you.

 

No, we are wise to this. Nothing to say he isnt hiding out in a spare bedroom and just hasnt informed council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

End of the say the council tax bill will be enough.

Collectica can only go to or send letters to the address provided to them by the courts which one can only presume your son provided in the first place not collecticas fault they are doing their job.

And as far as forced entry etc that is only applicable when there is confirmation that the debtor lives at the address and has told the court/bailiff they are wilfully refusing to pay - so dont worry about that.

As for the comment about demanding money with menaces - they havent asked you to pay his debt have they.

Sooner its sent off sooner the address is removed.

No need to waste money on a stat dec just as i said before ask for confirmation your address has been removed

 

Please dont issue bad advice. It makes no difference if the debtor has or has not spoken to us. All we would need is a neighbour to confirm he lives there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

£ with menaces comment was in regards to if they knocked at door and demanded for me £ or goods and as previous post highlighted they could take my stuff - yes email has gone off to collectica and automated response received I'm awaiting a reply

 

Still stressing though :(

 

OSW

 

They certainly shouldnt be telling you that YOUR goods may be taken, but they will threaten to take all goods unless proof is seen that they ARE your goods. But they shouldnt ask you to pay in any event.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please dont issue bad advice. It makes no difference if the debtor has or has not spoken to us. All we would need is a neighbour to confirm he lives there.

 

the following is taken from the words of an enforcement agent who works for collectica who has passed a level 3 certificate in taking control of goods, a good friend of mine who i have spoken to regarding this.

 

reasonable force can be used for an initial entry for fines but force can not be used against persons.

the property should be left as secure as it was found.

reasonable force is the use of a locksmith.

 

before forced entry is considered the EA must satisfy the following criteria

 

it should not be on the initial visit to the premises

the debtor must live at the address

there must be an element of refusal

hmcts must approve

there must be reasonable belief that there is sufficient assets

authority must come from management

the police should attend

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Wrong.

It can be done on the initial visit.

 

Yes, it must be the BELIEF of the ea that the debtor lives at the address.

 

The element of refusal is if he is refusing to respond to the ea then that's classed as refusal. Doesn't have to verbally refuse to pay for instance.

 

Hmcts need to approve? What if it outside of court hours then hmm? No, we inform them of what we intend to do and they agree. But if its outside of working hours, we seek approval from the company supervisors who authorise is and the court is informed of the action at the next available opportunity.

 

Yes, well obviously its pointless forcing entry to remove goods if no goods are within.

 

No, the EA decides on what to do. Management are informed and they can stop it if they see an issue but its the ea's decision.

 

If the police can be bothered too, but there is no requirement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...