Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help urgent bailiffs notice addressee doesn't live here *RESOLVED*


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3296 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thank you all !

 

Received a response to my stroppy and annoyed email first thing this morning confirming no further letters or visits will be made -

wish I hadn't stuck note to front door last night for the milk man to see :D

 

As ever your help has been immeasurable

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You've got to get into a dialogue with them. No emails - talk to them.

 

Explain the debtor isn't there and ask what you can provide by way of proof. Once they tell you, they have accepted and will expect some documents from you to clear this up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hello all

 

I have received (well in my sons name) a warrant of control.

 

My son left home some 8 years ago maybe a bit less - have had previous demands for payment in his name delivered here

 

And informed them that he does not live here no possessions etc...

 

But this one is curious it says that they have a warrant of control TCE 2007 - on behalf of HMTCS

 

But no details of where this debt has originated ?

 

I am curious as to if this is just a threatening communication as no details of debt.

 

I know it shouldn't concern me and I will email them to let them know that he doesn't live here.

 

But surely this letter should say whom the demand has come from / who £ is owed to?

 

any info would be great

 

OSW

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to provide proof that he doesnt live there. Council tax form or similar. They have been told by the court to collect at your home, so you need to show he doesnt live there.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

How long he has been gone for, forwarding address telephone number if you have them, and ask for a letter confirming your address has been removed off the system

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say so yes that is why i suggest getting written/typed confirmation your address has been removed

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A council tax document(or anything else for that matter) will show you are the main stayer at the address, but it doesnt prove your son doesnt live there. You may find that the EA will still call out and make enquiries, speak to neighbours, or ask to search your hourse to look for assets belonging to the defendant. If the EA is refused access, but he belives that you may be sheilding the def and the def may indeed be in the property, then he has the power to force entry and search for assets.

 

I would send the documents that you can and then call their help line and ask if that is sufficient. The only time you need to be worried is if neighbours are spoken to and confirm he is living with you.

 

Not sure how relaxed collectica are but you should be fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok I will send over statement and note that nothing in this house belongs to him unless school reports count

 

we have been estranged for many years and I have no idea where he is living I know he lived in 2 places and have put that in my email but we do not talk so dont know if either of these are current.

 

The agrivation this child has caused me is beyond belief

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about the OP goes to her local Court's admin office with her documents and swears a stat dec that her son is not resident at the address and all goods belong to her?

 

If this is a fine then the rights of the EA to make a forced entry means the OP needs to be extremely proactive in dealing with this

 

A council tax document(or anything else for that matter) will show you are the main stayer at the address, but it doesnt prove your son doesnt live there. You may find that the EA will still call out and make enquiries, speak to neighbours, or ask to search your hourse to look for assets belonging to the defendant. If the EA is refused access, but he belives that you may be sheilding the def and the def may indeed be in the property, then he has the power to force entry and search for assets.

 

I would send the documents that you can and then call their help line and ask if that is sufficient. The only time you need to be worried is if neighbours are spoken to and confirm he is living with you.

 

Not sure how relaxed collectica are but you should be fine.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Caledfwich ?

 

If this is a fine then the rights of the EA to make a forced entry means the OP needs to be extremely proactive in dealing with this

 

dont understand?

It means get all the proof to the court and Collecticarp Asap, or their EA/bailiff may well force entry if you are home and don't let him in, and poke around looking for your son's stuff, he might even take control of yours as he will convince himself son is there and your stuff is his.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to provide proof that he doesnt live there. The courts and bailiffs have heard every excuse, including people pretending to be disabled.

 

You need to get a stat dec done and provide proof to the courts, or things will get much more difficult to sort out.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is the first letter I have had here for him in a long time, years no one has knocked here and I am sure of that because I'm always in with the exception of hospital visits

 

- Oh this bloody child and proof of my disability is easy - This is demanding money with menaces surely as I am not the debtor

 

I've typed up an email to court and have sent one to Collecctica maybe I should phone the court too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you live on your own, and have claimed the single person's council tax discount? If so a copy of the council tax bill showing the discount would be sufficient to show he doesn't live with you.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I live with my husband and the council tax document I emailed over shows deductions but its a print out of what I pay and have paid unless they presume £300 a year is full council tax then yes it does show deductions - The annual statement I get from council tax office only has my name on it therefore I sent the copy of the online statement which also shows my husbands name (he is my carer)

 

Maybe I was wrong to do so - You would think that I would have received court documents to my address in my sons name prior to this wouldn't you ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

End of the say the council tax bill will be enough.

Collectica can only go to or send letters to the address provided to them by the courts which one can only presume your son provided in the first place not collecticas fault they are doing their job.

And as far as forced entry etc that is only applicable when there is confirmation that the debtor lives at the address and has told the court/bailiff they are wilfully refusing to pay - so dont worry about that.

As for the comment about demanding money with menaces - they havent asked you to pay his debt have they.

Sooner its sent off sooner the address is removed.

No need to waste money on a stat dec just as i said before ask for confirmation your address has been removed

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

End of the say the council tax bill will be enough.

Collectica can only go to or send letters to the address provided to them by the courts which one can only presume your son provided in the first place not collecticas fault they are doing their job.

And as far as forced entry etc that is only applicable when there is confirmation that the debtor lives at the address and has told the court/bailiff they are wilfully refusing to pay - so dont worry about that.

As for the comment about demanding money with menaces - they havent asked you to pay his debt have they.

Sooner its sent off sooner the address is removed.

No need to waste money on a stat dec just as i said before ask for confirmation your address has been removed

 

£ with menaces comment was in regards to if they knocked at door and demanded for me £ or goods and as previous post highlighted they could take my stuff - yes email has gone off to collectica and automated response received I'm awaiting a reply

 

Still stressing though :(

 

OSW

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about the OP goes to her local Court's admin office with her documents and swears a stat dec that her son is not resident at the address and all goods belong to her?

 

If this is a fine then the rights of the EA to make a forced entry means the OP needs to be extremely proactive in dealing with this

 

If she can get to the court and do that BEFORE the ea turns up and she can get the court to accept it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...