Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank-you dx for your feedback. That is the reason I posted my opinion, because I am trying to learn more and this is one of the ways to learn, by posting my opinions and if I am incorrect then being advised of the reasons I am incorrect. I am not sure if you have educated me on the points in my post that would be incorrect. However, you are correct on one point, I shall refrain from posting on any other thread other than my own going forward and if you think my post here is unhelpful, misleading or in any other way inappropriate, then please do feel obliged to delete it but educate me on the reason why. To help my learning process, it would be helpful to know what I got wrong other than it goes against established advice considering the outcome of a recent court case on this topic that seemed to suggest it was dismissed due to an appeal not being made at the first stage. Thank-you.   EDIT:  Just to be clear, I am not intending to go against established advice by suggesting that appeals should ALWAYS be made, just my thoughts on the particular case of paying for parking and entering an incorrect VRN. Also, I continue to be grateful for any advice you give on my own particular case.  
    • you can have your humble opinion.... You are very new to all this private parking speculative invoice game you have very quickly taken it upon yourself to be all over this forum, now to the extent of moving away from your initial thread with your own issue that you knew little about handling to littering the forum and posting on numerous established and existing threads, where advice has already been given or a conclusion has already resulted, with your theories conclusions and observations which of course are very welcomed. BUT... in some instances, like this one...you dont quite match the advice that the forum and it's members have gathered over a very long consensual period given in a tried and trusted consistent mannered thoughtful approach. one could even call it forum hi-jacking and that is becoming somewhat worrying . dx
    • Yeah, sorry, that's what I meant .... I said DCBL because I was reading a few threads about them discontinuing claims and getting spanked in court! Meant  YOU  Highview !!!  🖕 The more I read this forum and the more I engage with it's incredible users, the more I learn and the more my knowledge expands. If my case gets to court, the Judge will dismiss it after I utter my first sentence, and you DCBL and Highview don't even know why .... OMG! .... So excited to get to court!
    • Yep, I read that and thought about trying to find out what the consideration and grace period is at Riverside but not sure I can. I know they say "You must tell us the specific consideration/grace period at a site if our compliance team or our agents ask what it is"  but I doubt they would disclose it to the public, maybe I should have asked in my CPR 31.14 letter? Yes, I think I can get rid of 5 minutes. I am also going to include a point about BPA CoP: 13.2 The reference to a consideration period in 13.1 shall not apply where a parking event takes place. I think that is Deception .... They giveth with one hand and taketh away with the other! One other point to note, the more I read, the more I study, the more proficient I feel I am becoming in this area. Make no mistake DBCL if you are reading this, when I win in court, if I have the grounds to make any claims against you, such as breach of GDPR, I shall be doing so.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Employer offering redundancy as compromise agreement alternative - help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3915 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

 

I'm seeking some advice on an issue I'm having with my employer.

 

I have been off sick with anxiety and depression since march - in this time I was also made homeless which my employer was aware of. Occupational Health services advised my employer at the end of June that as long as they created a supported return to work and followed their recommendations I would be ready for a phased return to work by the end of July.

 

The subsequent meetings with my direct line manager was a conversation about why he feels I'm not ready to return back to work, some of the reasons being that 1) Conflict might cause me to breakdown 2) Not enough has changed in my personal life to support my return back to work 3) My reasons to return to work cannot be financial (specifically in regards to me being homeless).

 

My line manager has also shared my fit note with one of my colleagues who has then asked another employee what the address on my fit note was to me (basically trying to see if I was lying about being homeless).

 

I have since raised a grievance and advised there have been serious breach of my mutual trust and confidence with the employer and as such it would be impossible for me to return to work. I have advised I am seeking to resolve this with a compromise agreement which I feel would be fair at a 12 month settlement.

 

Unsurprisingly - my boss's line manager has come back and said that this is unrealistic. She has advised me that if I didn't want to come back to work (not that they have offered for me to come back) that they would be looking to offer me redundancy and the legal minimum - she has advised at a stretch they might extend this to 3 months.

 

During the grievance process - I have not been asked at any investigation meetings to define my grievance. I also feel they are going to try and say I have created a "consipracy" with other members of staff in regards to the breach of my data protection rights.

 

Does anybody have any advice at all? I don't believe they can offer my redundancy instead of a CA? Especially since my role is not redundant - they have someone covering me as a secondment at the moment. I also have had no disciplinary issues and have always been high achieving - is 12 months salary unreasonable?

 

Thank you for help here :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think 12 months is unreasonable yes, how long have you been there please. What are the causes of your anxiety and depression. Your work are already loosing out here, continuing to pay you (full pay i assume) whilst also employing a extra pair of hands to cover you, why do you think they will cough up 12 month salary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously, one slip up on showing a sick note to someone does not constitute irretreivable breakdown and allow you to claim constuctive dismissal. Nowhere near serious enough.

 

if the doctor/ OH says you are fit to go back it doesn't matter what your boss says, the end of July has passed, it's phased return time.

 

Get yourself back in.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

 

I've been there for 3 years - it isn't just one slip up, and sharing information from a fit note is a serious breach of the data protection act.

 

I haven't been receiving full pay for several months - causes of my anxiety and depression are work related. I can't go back if there is no role for me to go to because they haven't made the steps to allow that to happen.

 

I haven't listed everything (it would take up too much time) and really my question was around them wanting to offer me redundancy (and the bare minimum) instead of a compromise agreement. Can they do this if my job isn't being made redundant?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi There,

 

I've been there for 3 years - it isn't just one slip up, and sharing information from a fit note is a serious breach of the data protection act.

 

I haven't been receiving full pay for several months - causes of my anxiety and depression are work related. I can't go back if there is no role for me to go to because they haven't made the steps to allow that to happen.

 

I haven't listed everything (it would take up too much time) and really my question was around them wanting to offer me redundancy (and the bare minimum) instead of a compromise agreement. Can they do this if my job isn't being made redundant?

 

Of course they can, it goes on all the time, They will make redundant your job (by title) and create a new post and call it something different but the job will be 99.9% the same as old (now redundant) post

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been there for 3 years - it isn't just one slip up, and sharing information from a fit note is a serious breach of the data protection act.

 

I haven't listed everything (it would take up too much time) and really my question was around them wanting to offer me redundancy (and the bare minimum) instead of a compromise agreement. Can they do this if my job isn't being made redundant?

 

Well, I can't advise on what you are going to make me guess might have happened.

 

Can they invent a redundancy legally? No, not really, but if they are smart they'll find a way to do it.

 

If you are not on a fit note any more, and OH have advised you to go back, rock up at the office on Monday ready to start on the return plan they have reccomended. That is my very best advice; otherwise you have gone AWOL, which is a disciplianry matter, and then you'll be out with no cash at all.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jmebebe,

 

You can always seek pro bono advice at a law centre, ACAS or your local Citizens Advice Bureau.

 

Just a few thoughts....

 

The perceived breach of the DPA may not be as serious as you would like to believe - and you would have to prove such a breach actually occured. You may believe it is worth a year's salary - many others may disagree.

 

If you have only worked there for three years - so (dependant on your age) you may only be entitled to three weeks statutory redundancy pay - which is a lot less than the (at a pinch) three months pay your employers were thinking of offering.

 

Your role is currently been covered by a secondment - presumably then when you return this secondment will come to an end. So you can't really say there isn't a role for you to go back to?

 

The best advice could appear to be to get back to work.

 

Another good piece of advice I seen very recently on another thread was that an employee may feel that a wrong has been done onto them, but that doesn't mean there is a legal solution to that wrong (at an Employment Tribunal). And if you were to go to Tribunal there are now fees to pay to lodge a claim.

 

If you have had a lot of run-ins with mangement, and this history of turmoil is affecting your health, consider your future and what might be best for you.

 

I know from personal experience that it can be very difficult to objectively step back and think about all your options - particularly once you have locked horns with your employer. But it is something your should do.

 

Stepping away from it all might be a healthy option? You may have made that choice already? Maybe both you and your employer are really just negotiating how much any exit strategy might cost them - you say 12 months - they say 3 months. Maybe you can come down a bit and they can come up a bit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with the above. While there has no doubt been a breach of the DPA, a one-off breach is not serious enough to constitute a constructive dismissal. For constructive dismissal you basically need to show that the employer has seriously breached the employment contract such that it is impossible for you to go back to work. This is a very strict test and it does not sound like you meet it.

 

As the fit note says you are able to return to work, not returning to work would probably be seen as a resignation. When you resign the employer does not have to offer you anything at all.

 

The employer might be willing to offer you some sort of compromise agreement. But I think 12 months is unrealistic. Most unfair dismissal cases get nowhere near this figure. I actually think 3 months would probably be generous in the circumstances. You can see what you would be entitled to on a redundancy at the calculator here: https://www.gov.uk/calculate-your-redundancy-pay.

 

Sincerely hope you manage to get your financial problems sorted out. Perhaps agreeing a phased return to work, with the employer providing you with extra support, would be a good way forward?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...