Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can anyone help me. I am stuffed.    PayPal allowed me to deposit £4.4k into a gambling website when I had no cash in my bank.    It was the final straw and so I came clean with the wife and joined GA.    I didn't even think to search on the internet, despite how wrong Paypal's actions seemed to me.   This was a few weeks ago and I suffer with depression and anxiety, so all of this just crushed me.   I wake up every day and literally beat myself up.   After a lot of intervention and love I am able to lift my head out of the sand and address what has happened.    Here's the issue:  My wife was getting texts from Nationwide daily saying '£1,700 is due out of your account tomorrow' and so she found the money, and transferred it in.    We took on debt of £3k and Paypal have managed to get their hands on c£4k.    My Paypal balance is now -£420.   I initially posted this in the wrong place and dx kindly offered some advice.    yes I would get all the payments back from NW under chargeback and remove that account as a payment method to PP as well as you say via CPA..   I am not embarrassed to say that I don't understand how this works and the call to the bank is filling me with dread.    What do I need to say to the bank when requesting a charge back? Does this fall under unauthorised transactions?   PayPal aren't letting me remove the bank as a payment method atm.   Trying to not get my hopes up as this would be so huge for me and my family.    Truly grateful for any help.    Pierre  
    • Thank you so much for the reply and apologies for swearing. Will start a new topic.   Pierre
    • you need to create a new topic of your own please   hit create in the top red banner. please don't swear either..post above edited.   yes I would get all the payments back from NW under chargeback and remove that account as a payment method to PP as well as you say via CPA..   dx  
    • Can anyone help me. I am stuffed because of this exact thing.   I was allowed to deposit £4.4k into a gambling website when I had no cash in my bank.    It was the final straw and so I came clean with the wife and joined GA.    I didn't even think to search on the internet, despite how wrong Paypal's actions seemed to me.   This was a few weeks ago and I suffer with depression and anxiety, so all of this just crushed me.   I wake up every day and literally beat myself up.   After a lot of intervention and love I am able to lift my head out of the sand and address what has happened.    Here's the issue:  My wife was getting texts from Nationwide daily saying '£1,700 is due out of your account tomorrow' and so she found the money, and transferred it in.    We took on debt of £3k and Paypal have managed to get their hands on c£4k.    My Paypal balance is now -£420.   Nationwide are closed now I will call in the morning to cancel the CPA / DD.   Do I log a fraudulent payment claim against all of this? Or do I not have a leg to stand on now that I have paid? Should I contact the financial ombudsman?    Any advice would be appreciated.   I have payday loan repayments of £1,800 a month atm. and £4k would clear the majority of that debt... I have a 7 month old daughter and my Wife is on maternity etc. etc.   Suffice to say that the situation is dire.    Thanks if you read this far.   Pierre        
    • ring the clerk  ask what was wrong.   I think I know but not sure.   dx  
  • Our picks

    • Future Comms issues. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416504-future-comms-issues/
      • 3 replies
    • This is a bit of a lengthy one but I’ll summerise best as possible.
       
      THIS IS HOW THE PHONECALL WENT 
       
      I was contacted by future comms by phone, they stated that they could beat any phone contract I have , (I am a limited company but just myself that needs a business phone and I am the only worker) 
      I told future comms my deal, £110 per month with a phone and a virtual landline, they confirmed that they could beat that, £90 per month with a phone , virtual landline  they also confirmed they would pay Vodafone (previous provider) the termination fee. As I am in business, naturally I was open to making a deal. So we proceeded. 
      Future comms then revealed that the contract would be with PLAN.COM and the airtime would be provided by 02, I instantly told them that this would break the deal as I have poor 02 signal in the house where I live as my partner is on 02 and constantly complaining about bad signal
      the salesman assured me he would send a signal booster box out with the phone so I would have perfect signal.
      so far so good.....
      i then explained this is the only mobile phone I use for business and pleasure, so therefore I didn’t want any disconnection time in the slightest between the switchover from Vodafone to 02
      the salesman then confirmed that the existing phone would only be disconnected once the new phone was switched on.
      so far so good....
      • 14 replies
    • A shocking story of domestic and economic abuse compounded by @BarclaysUKHelp ‏ bank complicity – coming soon @A_Gentle_Woman. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/415737-a-shocking-story-of-domestic-and-economic-abuse-compounded-by-barclaysukhelp-%E2%80%8F-bank-complicity-%E2%80%93-coming-soon-a_gentle_woman/
      • 0 replies
    • The FSA has announced large fines against DB UK Bank Limited (trading as DB Mortgages) - DeutscheBank and also against Redstone for their unfair treatment of their customers.
      Please see the links below for summaries and full details from the FSA website.
      It is now completely clear that any arrears charges which exceed actual administrative costs are unfair and therefore unlawful.
      Furthemore, irresponsible lending practices are also unfair and unlawful.
      Additionally there are other unfair practices including unarranged counsellor visits - even if they have been attempted.
      You are entitled to refuse counsellor visits and not incur any charges.
      Any charges for counsellor visits must not seek to make profits. The cost of the visits must be passed on to you at cost price.
      We are hearing stories of people being charged for counsellor visits for which there is no evidence that they were even attempted.
      It is clear that some mortgage lenders are trying to cheat you out of your money.
      You should ascertain how much has been taken from you and claim it back. The chances of winning are better than 90%. It is highly likely that the lender will attempt to avoid court action and offer you back your money.
      However, you should ensure that you receive a proper rate of interest and this means that you should be seeking at least restitutionary damages - which would be much higher than the statutory 8%.
      Furthermore, you should assess whether the paying of demands for unlawful excessive charges has also out you further into arrears and if this has caused you further penalties in terms of extra interest or any other prejudice. This should be claimed as well.
      If excessive unlawful charges have resulted in your credit file being affected, then you should take this into account also when working out exactly what you want by way of remedy from the lender.
      You should consult others on these forums when considering any offer.
      You must not make any complaint through the Ombudsman. your time will be wasted, you will wait up to 2 yrs and there will be a minimal 8% award of interest and no account will be taken of any other damage you have suffered.
      You must make your complaint through the County Court for a rapid and effective remedy.

      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2010/120.shtml
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/redstone.pdf
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/final/db_uk.pdf
       
      http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/consumerinformation/firmnews/2011/db_mortgages.shtml
      Do you have a mortage arears claim to make? Then post your story on the forum here
        • Like
      • 0 replies
ukaviator

Housing benefit challenge dismissed by High Court

style="text-align:center;"> Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 813 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

A group of disabled people have lost a court challenge to cuts in social housing benefit for residents with spare bedrooms in England, Wales and Scotland.

 

The High Court said the policy, dubbed a "bedroom tax" by critics, was not unlawfully discriminatory. But it criticised the government for failing to follow a 2012 ruling that said housing benefit should not be cut where disabled children were involved. The group said they would appeal. Since April, people deemed to have one spare bedroom have had their housing benefit reduced by 14% while those with two or more spare bedrooms have seen reductions of 25%. Lawyers for 10 families, which include disabled adults or children, challenged the changes during a three-day hearing in May.

 

Their lawyers argued the benefit cuts hit them disproportionately hard and were therefore discriminatory. Some argued that the additional bedrooms were needed for medical equipment or, in the case of some of the children, because behavioural problems made it impossible to share a room. The High Court ruled that applying the cap to disabled people was based on "a reasonable foundation" and its effects had been "properly considered".

 

It said, however, said the government had been too slow to introduce new regulations prohibiting reductions in housing benefit where an extra bedroom was required for disabled children who were unable to share. Judge Lord Justice Laws said the Department for Work and Pensions was obliged to follow an appeal court ruling and must now do so "very speedily". The government said the new regulations would be introduced this autumn. It also said it had already provided £150m to councils to make discretionary payments to those affected by its changes to welfare payments, and announced that it would bolster the fund for those affected by housing benefit changes by £35m.

 

More: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23503095


Some useful links.

FAQ's

Making Posts

Letter Template Library

Bank Contact Details

AQ Guide to Completion

Court Fees

Data Protection non Compliance

Witness Statements for Court Bundle

Banking Code Website

Limitations Act

Fast Track Costs

A-Z Index

Mis-Claim Tutorial

Step By Step Instructions

 

Remember: The Ark was built by amateurs-The Titanic by professionals.

 

Please click my scales if you find my advice helpful !

 

If your claim is successful, please donate 5% so that it can continue to help others.

 

Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

WARNING TO ALL

Please be aware of acting on advice given by PM .Anyone can make mistakes and if advice is given on the main forum people can see it to correct it ,if given privately then no one can see it to correct it. Please also be aware of giving your personal details to strangers

 

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

YOU CAN NOW COMPLAIN TO THE OFT ABOUT THEIR CONDUCT UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION FROM UNFAIR TRADING REGULATIONS 2008.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing I don't understand about this is; was it not the council that allocated these premises to these people in the first place? then, if now they are too big, is it not the councils responsibility to rehouse them and address all their needs!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi agree but I believe that most councils/ housing groups do not have enough one bedroom properties to allow those in difficulties with the bedroom tax to move into suitable accommodation. My area over 700 applications for 43 one bedroom properties.

 

dpick


cannot find it A to Z

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

 

 

Halifax :D

Paid in full £2295

 

MBNA:mad: 20/03/2008 settled in full out of court

 

Capital One:D

07/07/2007 Capital one charges paid in full £1666

19/01/2008 recovered PPI £2216 + costs

 

Littlewoods :-D

12/08/2007 write off £1176.10 debt.

 

JD Williams charges refunded in full £640

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its all just a joke, you have a family home. As the children get older and move out, they gain an empty room get charged for it. There are not enough houses to move to a smaller house, so your left to pay it. Who pays for the move, decorating, etc. London is an example of people being moved to an other town. So what happens when the people move who are then left without the support next work disabled people leave behind.

 

 

S

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...