Jump to content


Capquest purchased old LTSB 2007 Credit Card account - No CCA


krysp
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2687 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Your CRA file doesn't show any positive balances, only negative ones. The absence of a negative balance only implies that the actual balance is greater than or equal to zero. So they can't find out how much cash is in your bank account that way.

 

Once they have a CCJ for the debt concerned, things change. You would be required to reveal your financial circumstances if you wanted to pay off a CCJ in instalments and the court officer would ask to see bank statements. If you don't pay then you can be ordered to provide this information. Some creditors would just go straight for an Attachment of Earnings Order.

 

In theory, after getting a CCJ, they can also apply for a Third Party Debt Order to force your bank(s) to reveal your balance and then to seize the money concerned. These are extremely rare for individuals, since the creditor has no way of knowing which bank you're actually keeping money in, whether the order will actually work, and if there is no money then the order is a waste of time, because it is only effective for one enquiry.

 

It is possible that DCAs share information amongst themselves about bank balances, almost certainly if one DCA is handling multiple accounts, but this sort of practice is probably highly dubious!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When you say 'unenforceable', are you referring to a pre-2007 account? There are a lot of threads about that on here, because it's quite a minefield.

 

Or do you mean Statute Barred, in which case when was the last payment made (it needs to be more than 6 years ago to be unenforceable through the Courts)?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It sounds a bit like debt avoidance to me.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Would make it unenforceable in court, but they can still chase you, mark your credit file, and gain a CCJ. They just cant enforce the CCJ. Perhaps make them a very small F&F?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nah, not interested in f&f, they'll mark my credit file as partial satisfied and flog on the rest to another DCA.

 

Original creditor has already marked my credit file with a default three years ago, so my file is trashed. Don't need, want or use credit any more so not too concerned with my credit file.

 

I've been chased continuously over the last three years by a succession of DCAs so unless they go ahead with legal proceedings, I can cope with the chasing.

 

Confused?? How is it possible to obtain a CCJ whilst at the same time it being unenforceable in court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

well theres no point in them going to court if they cannot enforce the judgement

 

so to all intent and purpose they don't bother

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depends who the creditor is Some DCA's are vindictive and if they cant get money out of you, theyll take you to court and try and get a CCJ just to ruin you for the next 6 years.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Capquest is the DCA, heard they're a pretty nasty bunch.

 

I'll treat them like the other DCA's I've dealt with - polite, keep to the facts and hopefully convince them I know what I'm talking about and won't be intimidated by the threat of court action.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Be careful with crapquest, they will call your bluff, so make sure you have all the paperwork and evidence ready, just incase they go through with a claim.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...

As the title states, does anyone have an arrangement with a DCA for communications via email?

 

Can I insist upon communications via email or is any such arrangement at the discretion of the dca?

 

I've received letters from DCA's recently where the difference between date on the letter and date received is several days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who is the DCA in question?

I would say Yes to this. I have done this with Lowell as it's just as valid as a normal letter.

Make it clear to them that you want to correspond via email only.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great, DCA in question is capquest.

 

There's some freeware software that tracks and confirms when a sent email has been delivered and viewed, any ideas on the name, I think it's pig something?

Link to post
Share on other sites

As the title states, does anyone have an arrangement with a DCA for communications via email?

 

Can I insist upon communications via email or is any such arrangement at the discretion of the dca?

 

I've received letters from DCA's recently where the difference between date on the letter and date received is several days.

 

- so what? is this causing you issues

 

don't forget DCA's are NOT BAILIFFS

 

they have

 

NO SUCH LEGAL POWERS

 

tell us the story please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In addition to the issue mentioned above, I sometimes work away for a couple of weeks and with nobody at home, letters lie around unanswered for a while. It's not worth setting up mail forwarding as I'm living in different hotels on the most part whilst working away.

 

Whilst I loathe the parasites that are DCA's generically and capquest specifically and do everything in my power to frustrate them as often as possible, I don't want to appear to ignore letters when in reality it's a combination of them falsifying their letter dates and me being away from home for a bit.

 

Anything that prevents them or gives them an excuse from pushing my case to the top of the litigation pile, gets my attention.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats this that Lloyds credit card debacle?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been communicating with various DCAs around an old LTSB CC for years and with capquest having purchased the debt from Lloyds, they are beginning to get somewhat more aggressive in their stance of late.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet its SB by now anyhow

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

you sure

 

having merged 17 threads on the same debt of yours

 

it starts around 2007?

 

please keep to one thread per debt!

 

else it makes a mockery of past advise

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...