Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 1. who knows... 2. not the whole A/C vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th b'day ...already carefully explain this. 3.yes 4.already carefully explain this.
    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Housing benefits fraud - IUC


mnmless
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3904 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I am 19 years old and a student. Today I received a letter in the mail concerning an IUC dated for August 6th. To explain this benefit fraud; I lived alone from March 1st 2012 - September 10th 2012 and failed to contact the Council. The reason for this was because my father (who set up my flat and also Housing Benefits) told me not to worry about anything and he will sort everything out, it appears he failed to do so.

 

I was receiving £127 a fortnight (to pay my landlady) and was receiving this up until last month AFTER moving out, to my absolute horror. This totals a £2540 overpayment.

 

I KNOW that this is my responsibility 100% and I have explained this whole situation to my mother who will accompany me in this IUC.

 

To conclude this, I would like some advice on what to expect, I am worried sick and cannot eat or think about anything BUT this. I've done a lot of research but I understand that I cannot compare cases. What should I expect and what advice can some of you give me? I really don't want this to hinder my future as I am only 19 and soon to move to attend a new University and hopefully begin my life.

 

Thank you all very much!

Edited by mnmless
Link to post
Share on other sites

well,you must have noticed the money was still being paid into your bank account so theres no point in trying to say you didnt know about it,ultimately the benefits people look for the overpayment paying back so they will probably set up a payment plan for you to pay it back,they very rarely send you to prison but they might make a fine on you for a percentage of the overpayment,dont worry about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

well,you must have noticed the money was still being paid into your bank account so theres no point in trying to say you didnt know about it,ultimately the benefits people look for the overpayment paying back so they will probably set up a payment plan for you to pay it back,they very rarely send you to prison but they might make a fine on you for a percentage of the overpayment,dont worry about it

Understood. I have began to pay this overpayment back. I believe that the fine is 30% of the overpaid benefit, do you know if this is true?

 

Thank you for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Understood. I have began to pay this overpayment back. I believe that the fine is 30% of the overpaid benefit, do you know if this is true?

 

 

That is one possible outcome, yes - it's called an "Administrative Penalty". If it's offered by the council you do not have to accept it (you can choose to go to court instead) but if you did accept you would avoid a criminal record. The council does not have to offer an AP, but they may do so in cases that are not considered serious enough for court action.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is one possible outcome, yes - it's called an "Administrative Penalty". If it's offered by the council you do not have to accept it (you can choose to go to court instead) but if you did accept you would avoid a criminal record. The council does not have to offer an AP, but they may do so in cases that are not considered serious enough for court action.

 

Do you believe my case would be considered enough for court action?

Edited by mnmless
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I am 19 years old and a student. Today I received a letter in the mail concerning an IUC dated for August 6th. To explain this benefit fraud; I lived alone from March 1st 2012 - September 10th 2012 and failed to contact the Council. The reason for this was because my father (who set up my flat and also Housing Benefits) told me not to worry about anything and he will sort everything out, it appears he failed to do so.

 

I was receiving £127 a fortnight (to pay my landlady) and was receiving this up until last month AFTER moving out, to my absolute horror. This totals a £2540 overpayment.

 

I KNOW that this is my responsibility 100% and I have explained this whole situation to my mother who will accompany me in this IUC.

 

To conclude this, I would like some advice on what to expect, I am worried sick and cannot eat or think about anything BUT this. I've done a lot of research but I understand that I cannot compare cases. What should I expect and what advice can some of you give me? I really don't want this to hinder my future as I am only 19 and soon to move to attend a new University and hopefully begin my life.

 

Thank you all very much!

 

Have you received your overpayment letter with a penalty added on before even attending your IUC?

 

I know you are worried but I would have attended the interview first and put your side of the story to them before starting to pay back. Quite often they get their figures wrong first time round too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you believe my case would be considered enough for court action?

 

No-one here can really answer that question - it depends on the specific circumstances of each case. Personally, I don't think you've committed crime of the century here. I'm assuming your claim was genuine when it was first made - in other words, you lived in the place and legitimately received benefits but those benefits continued after you moved out. Is this correct?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No-one here can really answer that question - it depends on the specific circumstances of each case. Personally, I don't think you've committed crime of the century here. I'm assuming your claim was genuine when it was first made - in other words, you lived in the place and legitimately received benefits but those benefits continued after you moved out. Is this correct?

Yes, my claim was legitimate and was receiving the HB to top off my rent and then unfortunately continued once I moved out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you received your overpayment letter with a penalty added on before even attending your IUC?

 

I know you are worried but I would have attended the interview first and put your side of the story to them before starting to pay back. Quite often they get their figures wrong first time round too.

 

Hello,

I received a bill that had the overpayment sum which I stated in the initial post. Although it could be wrong, I was instructed to pay back within 7 days of receiving the letter or at least begin to pay back, which was the action I took. I then got the letter concerning the interview today (July 25th) and the interview will take place on August 6th.

 

Thank you for your advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you entitled to any legal aid? if so, you could contact a solicitor for some advice, im sure they would be able to at least give you advice even if you wasnt entitled. maybe you could try talking to welfare rights. im going through a situation myself and i have an interview on the 8th aug. iv been looking around on the net to find out the possible outcomes. i found a website to be quite helpful, please have a read it may help.

 

http://www.advicenow.org.uk/advicenow-guides/problems-with-benefits/how-to-handle-an-interview-under-caution/after-the-interview-under-caution-html,661,FP.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

are you entitled to any legal aid? if so, you could contact a solicitor for some advice, im sure they would be able to at least give you advice even if you wasnt entitled. maybe you could try talking to welfare rights. im going through a situation myself and i have an interview on the 8th aug. iv been looking around on the net to find out the possible outcomes. i found a website to be quite helpful, please have a read it may help.

 

Hello,

 

This link has been very helpful and stopped me worrying about the "worst case scenario". I've spoken to various people that have been through the same ordeal and they have also told me not to worry myself sick like we all seem to do. I wish you the best of luck for your interview, please update me on the outcome as I will do here.

 

Thank you!

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know a person who went to jail for housing benefit fraud BUT she had committed the offense before and then did it again, i think she was sentenced for 6 months but did 2. she owed huge amounts. so please try not to worry. even if they prosecute you i think worse case you would get a suspended sentence or maybe community service, again i think this is normally in high amounts. If you have admitted your error i dont see why they would need to take you to court, i think they do this with people who deny things. and thank you i will let you know the outcome. i wish you luck and will be thinking of you :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

i found this also, the following are taken into mind when deciding on a punishment:

 

 

  • Offending carried out over a long period
  • Offender acting with others
  • Planning
  • Motivated by greed or desire to live beyond his or her means
  • False identities or details
  • False or forged documents
  • Official documents altered or falsified.

Then you have the mitigating factors also considered

 

  1. a guilty plea;
  2. the amount involved and the length of time over which the defalcations were persisted in (bearing in mind that a large total may in fact represent a very small amount weekly);
  3. the circumstances in which the offence began (e.g. there is a plain difference between a legitimate claim which becomes false owing to a change of situation and on the other hand a claim which is false from the very beginning);
  4. the use to which the money is put (the provision of household necessities is more venial than spending the money on unnecessary luxury);
  5. previous character;
  6. matters special to the offender, such as illness, disability, family difficulties, etc;
  7. any voluntary repayment of the amounts overpaid.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i found this also, the following are taken into mind when deciding on a punishment:

 

 

 

  • Offending carried out over a long period
  • Offender acting with others
  • Planning
  • Motivated by greed or desire to live beyond his or her means
  • False identities or details
  • False or forged documents
  • Official documents altered or falsified.

 

Then you have the mitigating factors also considered

 

 

  1. a guilty plea;
  2. the amount involved and the length of time over which the defalcations were persisted in (bearing in mind that a large total may in fact represent a very small amount weekly);
  3. the circumstances in which the offence began (e.g. there is a plain difference between a legitimate claim which becomes false owing to a change of situation and on the other hand a claim which is false from the very beginning);
  4. the use to which the money is put (the provision of household necessities is more venial than spending the money on unnecessary luxury);
  5. previous character;
  6. matters special to the offender, such as illness, disability, family difficulties, etc;
  7. any voluntary repayment of the amounts overpaid.

 

Oh, this is interesting. I will scan over this for the next few days, I can assume questions based on this list are what I have to look forward to. Oh and thank you for both responses, I'm feeling much better about the situation. Stay strong and keep smiling!

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha no this was for when deciding on a punishment should they decide to prosecute you. iv just seen back on your post that you are only 19, i think you are extremely mature and going about this honestly, i hope they will see the same :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha no this was for when deciding on a punishment should they decide to prosecute you. iv just seen back on your post that you are only 19, i think you are extremely mature and going about this honestly, i hope they will see the same :)

Oh, I understand haha, my mistake! Yes, thank you very much for that actually. I really hope they see the same, too. You also seem to know your stuff, I'm sure you're very prepared! I'm crossing everything for everyone going through the same as us! It's not a good feeling at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know hun, iv spent an entire week on the internet, hours at a time reading stories. now iv been looking at when people have been prosecuted and what the outcome was, the worst case iv read about is a lady (im not sure if im allowed to name people on here) who claimed £353,000 in benefits over 12 years, she lied saying 5 of her children had disabilities when they didnt, she only got 4 years in prison. i think she would serve less.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know hun, iv spent an entire week on the internet, hours at a time reading stories. now iv been looking at when people have been prosecuted and what the outcome was, the worst case iv read about is a lady (im not sure if im allowed to name people on here) who claimed £353,000 in benefits over 12 years, she lied saying 5 of her children had disabilities when they didnt, she only got 4 years in prison. i think she would serve less.

 

Ditto! I can't help but try to compare my case with others in hopes to calm myself. That's a long sentence but that's also a lot of money, I don't know how the system works. I've read about people who wrongfully claimed 5 figures and were given a warning, and this is going into the 50k mark!! Some cases are very shocking and it's very interesting how the world changes when this happens to yourself, it's changed me for the better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is a lady from runcorn who failed to declare her partner was living with her, she obtained £2500, so its a similar amount to yours although a completely different case, she got a 6 week curfew 9pm-7am and a fine of £150. thats not too scary is it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right well im off to put my girls to bed as they are still up and making a mess :(. try and relax a bit this weekend, give yourself a break from it and stop being hard on yourself, people make mistakes and you cant change it now, you just need to look forward and start afresh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

right well im off to put my girls to bed as they are still up and making a mess :(. try and relax a bit this weekend, give yourself a break from it and stop being hard on yourself, people make mistakes and you cant change it now, you just need to look forward and start afresh.

 

Thank you so much for this breath of fresh air! I feel there are good people in the world after all!! I totally agree, mistakes are mistake and cannot be changed, only the person that made them. I am hoping the best for your interview, have a good night! :-D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know hun, iv spent an entire week on the internet, hours at a time reading stories. now iv been looking at when people have been prosecuted and what the outcome was, the worst case iv read about is a lady (im not sure if im allowed to name people on here) who claimed £353,000 in benefits over 12 years, she lied saying 5 of her children had disabilities when they didnt, she only got 4 years in prison. i think she would serve less.

 

[bolding mine]

 

Regarding naming people, if something is a matter of public record (say, has been reported in the papers or whatever) then it should be OK.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...