Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • We hear from three people who have started their own companies during the downturn in aviation. View the full article
    • Covid-19 has created extra problems this Halloween, so how are firms fighting back? View the full article
    • its a 12mts contract else why would it say till 2021 and first month..   simply states they don't charge a joining fee clever marketing ploy as people don't read things. it IS a monthly payment, that runs for 12mts.   but anyway there is stuff and all anyone can do to you.   dx        
    • Hi Slick,   Amazingly fast reply, thank you!   According to the reference on the payment it says "ON 24 SEP BCC" and the payment cleared 25th September at 11:26   I was simply told to sign up on the website by a staff member in the gym, no further information was given to me by them. The website stated that it's a rolling monthly membership that could be cancelled at any time "No contract membership JUST £14.99 a month, until 2021*" As far as I am aware there was absolutely no minimum membership length, unless there's some small print I've missed somewhere. But Harlands haven't mentioned anything about me being obliged to pay for a certain length of time so... I've attached a picture to this post of what I signed up for.   Also, I'm not sure if this has any relevance at all but the building is plastered with £9.99/month signs EVERYWHERE yet it costs £14.99 when you go on the website. False advertising 🙄 Could perhaps use that as leverage in a letter if it comes to it, I dunno? 😂
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2555 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

I don't know if they are required to provide the schedule before the hearing )but how else could you be afforded time to inspect/challenge the aggregated total figure?) Perhaps this is another point that other caggers could please clarify?

 

Also there has been some advice along the lines that respondents can either apply for the cost of external legal advice, or internal legal time spent preparing for the hearing, but not both sets of costs. It might be worth knowing for the hearing which rule/procedure sets out that distinction - could other caggers advise please?

 

Your hearing is on Friday 25th isn't it? How are you shaping up - feeling OK?

 

Thank you!!

Yes it is that friday I have sent them all copies of my dads illness also copies of my dmp.

I have also done what somebody suggested and sent them a settlement figure that doesnt impact my dmp, they have till thurs to decide.

I want you to understand I have done this because of the stress im going through right now with my dad. I dont live near my parents which makes things harder.

I weighed up the pros and cons I could lose that is a reality and I need closure because its affecting me.

some might not agree but I thought it was the best for me to do.

I have said to them its not a admission of guilt but for the reasons ive just mentioned.

 

Thanks for asking SweetLorraine I would suggest anyone going to a et to think very carefully tho. X

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 154
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi again claireloupul,

 

well it could be resolution of sorts by Thursday then. If you do have to go forward to a hearing then hopefully we can improve your chances of a successful hearing with some of the ongoing questions and answers in the thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi again claireloupul,

 

well it could be resolution of sorts by Thursday then. If you do have to go forward to a hearing then hopefully we can improve your chances of a successful hearing with some of the ongoing questions and answers in the thread.

 

Thanks sweetlorraine, I do appreciate everyone's help. If they don't agree then I have my bundle and statement ready and I will just have to pray for the best.

Link to post
Share on other sites
I don't know if they are required to provide the schedule before the hearing )but how else could you be afforded time to inspect/challenge the aggregated total figure?) Perhaps this is another point that other caggers could please clarify?

 

Also there has been some advice along the lines that respondents can either apply for the cost of external legal advice, or internal legal time spent preparing for the hearing, but not both sets of costs. It might be worth knowing for the hearing which rule/procedure sets out that distinction - could other caggers advise please?

 

Your hearing is on Friday 25th isn't it? How are you shaping up - feeling OK?

 

Hi, I'II just use the quote option to 'bump up' these latest little queries for other caggers to consider again.

 

Just to clarify again claireloupul - when did the respondent warn that they might apply for costs (was after the first hearing date and before the second hearing date?) and when did you first hear that the figure would be £3k?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi, I'II just use the quote option to 'bump up' these latest little queries for other caggers to consider again.

 

Just to clarify again claireloupul - when did the respondent warn that they might apply for costs (was after the first hearing date and before the second hearing date?) and when did you first hear that the figure would be £3k?

 

They did so before the first hearing, they did say it would be £2500-£3000 if it proceeds to a final hearing (there wording). Then I received a letter stating they were applying for costs of £3000 plus Vat with a final hearing costs of £1600 plus vat.

 

Hope that helps thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
They did so before the first hearing, they did say it would be £2500-£3000 if it proceeds to a final hearing (there wording). Then I received a letter stating they were applying for costs of £3000 plus Vat with a final hearing costs of £1600 plus vat.

 

Hope that helps thanks

 

hi just to let you know they have come back with a offer of without prejudice and rejected my offer and said they would accept £1500 and said I cannot use that letter in the courts.

of course because of my dmp I cant accept this. So it will be rejected.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

SweetLorraine you do make a very good point about the costs.

In there first settlement offer they said they client had spent £3000 and then £1600 to go to court and in the letter i Recieved today it was said it was a reasonable offer considering there client had spent £5000 in costs preparing the case I had withdrawn.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, just thinking, the solicitor has first said that costs to date in one letter is approx £3000 plus vat which is £3600 now there saying it is £5000 ( vat wasn't mentioned ) in another letter which was the without prejudice now could I use this letter as evidence to prove that they are trying to profit out of this case?

 

Any thoughts?.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thinking aloud.

 

If a letter is without prejudice save costs, I wonder if it can be presented in a costs hearing, therefore showing the inconsistency of their actual costs.

 

 

Okay, just thinking, the solicitor has first said that costs to date in one letter is approx £3000 plus vat which is £3600 now there saying it is £5000 ( vat wasn't mentioned ) in another letter which was the without prejudice now could I use this letter as evidence to prove that they are trying to profit out of this case?

 

Any thoughts?.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just thinking aloud.

 

If a letter is without prejudice save costs, I wonder if it can be presented in a costs hearing, therefore showing the inconsistency of their actual costs.

 

No it can't be presented or even referred to in court.

 

However, what the OP could do is get the schedule of costs from them and make a comparison with the original letter that was not marked as being "without prejudice". That would be allowed by the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The whole point of 'Without Prejudice Save as to Costs' is that it CAN be produced in a costs hearing.

 

Claireloupul: it looks like they are trying to call your bluff. They are not being reasonable, so there is no popint in arguing with them further.

 

Assuming you did mark your offer WPSATC then you can bring it to the Tribunal's attention should they rule that costs are payable. Point out you made the other party a reasonable offer and in effect, they brought about the costs hearing having to be heard after your reasonable attempts to settle fairly.

 

If that fails and in the worst case scenario you get landed with a huge bill (I doubt this will happen) then remember to ask if you can pay in reasonable instalments according to your means.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi claireloupul,

 

so it looks as though the hearing on the 25th is on. If the respondent is now quoting totals it is perhaps reasonable to assume they now have drafted a costs schedule. If they have drafted such a schedule it would be reasonable to expect them to send you a copy in advance of the hearing. A failure to send you a copy in advance is not reasonable behaviour on their part.

 

Worth flagging up at the hearing itself perhaps? (comments welcome).

Link to post
Share on other sites
The whole point of 'Without Prejudice Save as to Costs' is that it CAN be produced in a costs hearing.

 

.

 

Yes but only AFTER the judge has made a ruling as to liability for costs. It can not be used in the context of a defence to avoid costs being awarded. In this instance if I was the OP I would be going all out to have the application for costs denied rather than making offers as if the judge does make a costs award then it will be based on time x rate and not on what the OP has offered. Her offer is only really of any significance if the judge awards an amount lower than what is being claimed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WP correspondence cannot be produced when the court decides on liability for the underlying claim, but it can be produced when the court decides who should be liable for costs.

 

In the civil courts outside small claims track this is usually the same thing (since the person who wins on liability will almost automatically get their costs from the other side) but not the same thing in Employment Tribunals.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes but only AFTER the judge has made a ruling as to liability for costs. It can not be used in the context of a defence to avoid costs being awarded.

 

That is what I said. Once costs are ruled then it bcomes an issue. As there is a costs hearing, based on a postponed listed hearing, then there is quite a high risk of costs being awarded. If all else fails, assessment of means and the WPSATC is the next safety net.

 

The best thing the OP can do is be fully prepared. I believe it is unlikely the cost award will be over £500.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone, yes there are differences on the amounts quoted even before the wp letter, the first one said that it was between 2500 and 3000 no mention of vat and then the next one was £3000 plus vat as a reasonable settlement. This was said because of the postponement they had to.do four months work I dont see how to be honest and one of my questions will be can you produce all dates and times.

the offer is up till close of business tomorrow so I will let you know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They emailed me today and said they have a response from their client but they want my number so they can discuss it.

I'm not sure if I should talk to them or to keep everything by email.

Any thoughts.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

When I had conversations with "the other side's" legal reps I found it rather one-sided and I found that they would later deny things they had said and twist/clip things I had said to fit their own agenda. (I wish I had recorded those conversations). Of course you end up having to address these half-truths rather than putting across your own points. One of their favourite tricks was to state 'we have here in our notes' before trotting out some nonsense that I would not have said/agreed to beforehand. Bad memories.

 

I would prefer an email exchange - they can stick a 'WP' on it surely?

 

Whatever media you choose I would also say when dealing with legal reps that brevity is important. If you meander around a point of discussion they can pick up on it and take you for a spin down a wrong turning.

Link to post
Share on other sites
When I had conversations with "the other side's" legal reps I found it rather one-sided and I found that they would later deny things they had said and twist/clip things I had said to fit their own agenda. (I wish I had recorded those conversations). Of course you end up having to address these half-truths rather than putting across your own points. One of their favourite tricks was to state 'we have here in our notes' before trotting out some nonsense that I would not have said/agreed to beforehand. Bad memories.

 

I would prefer an email exchange - they can stick a 'WP' on it surely?

 

Whatever media you choose I would also say when dealing with legal reps that brevity is important. If you meander around a point of discussion they can pick up on it and take you for a spin down a wrong turning.

 

I really dont know what to do.

they have said they will only accept £1000

And its something I cant afford

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally I would read into that, that they know they might not get anything.

 

Big difference from what they were claiming to now accept £1000.

 

These people go for all they can get, they are not out to help you, don't for one minute think they are being reasonable, they know they might not get anything.

 

If you really don't want to wait for the tribunal, then get back to them and confidently tell them you only have £500 do you want to take that, if not we will leave it too the tribunal, where you probably won't get anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...