Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Raising a claim


kirstmcc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I have looked at other sections but wasn't able to find the answer, is there anywhere that will provide information about filling in the paperwork for submitting my claim.

 

I have send two letters requesting my charges back, and the deadline for a response is the 19th April, and i wanted to start puttin my claim together as i have a feeling they won't refund the charges, althought they did refund the latest 2 which came to £50.

 

Any advice is gratefully received!!

Thanks

Kirsty

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is in the libary

When you want to fool the world, tell the truth. :D

Advice & opinions of Janet-M are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any

doubts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

When lodging a claim via the MoneyClaim site, can I simply use the "Particulars of Claim" from the Templates Library (i.e. is there enough space etc):

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=681

 

Additionally when submitting the claim how should I set out the following charges (including interest)? Basically, I've been charged £288, with £136 subsequently being refunded by A&L after repeated begging.

 

5/7/05 Failed [£310 cheque] Item = £34 (£34 refunded 11/07/05)

8/7/05 Failed [represented £310 cheque] Item = £34 (£17 refunded 11/07/05)

8/7/05 Failed [£306.42] Direct Debit = £34

30/01/2006 Paid Item Charge [overdraft limit exceeded by £50.82] = £25

01/02/2006 Failed [£15.81] Direct Debit = £34 (£34 refunded 10/02/06)

01/02/2006 Failed [£37.98] Direct Debit = £34 (£17 refunded 10/02/06)

01/02/2006 Failed [£24.65] Direct Debit = £34 (£17 refunded 10/02/06)

01/02/2006 Failed [£85.00] Direct Debit = £34 (£17 refunded 10/02/06)

06/03/2006 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge = £25

 

How would I show the calculation on interest on the above

 

Thanks in anticipation of any replies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a contract with the Alliance & Leicester Bank ("the Defendant") dated 14th January 2005 which is conducted on their standard terms and conditions. During the period in which my account number 123456 ("the Account") has been operating, the Defendant has debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract by myself and also charged interest on the charges once applied. I understand that the Defendant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract.

 

These charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999. Para.8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15.

Accordingly, as I have repeatedly asked the Defendant to justify their charges but they have declined to do so, I respectfully claim the return of the amounts debited in respect of charges in the sum of £152.00, Court costs and interest pursuant to section 69 County Courts Act as set out on the following list of charges or at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just plus interest charged thereon:

 

i) 5/7/05 Failed Item [£310 cheque] Charge = £34 (£34 refunded 11/07/05) – Amount Claimed £0

ii) 8/7/05 Failed Item [£310 cheque] Charge = £34 (£17 refunded 11/07/05) - Amount claimed £17 + £1.11 interest @ 8% [297days x 0.00022 x £17]

iii) 8/7/05 Failed Direct Debit [£306.42] Charge = £34 - Amount claimed £34 + £2.22 interest @ 8% [297days x 0.00022 x £34]

iv) 30/1/06 Paid Item Charge [overdraft limit exceeded by £50.82] = £25 – Amount Claimed £25 + £0.50 interest @ 8% [91days x 0.00022 x £25]

v) 1/2/06 Failed Direct Debit [£15.81] = £34 (£34 refunded 10/02/06) – Amount Claimed £0

vi) 1/2/06 Failed Direct Debit [£37.98] = £34 (£17 refunded 10/02/06) – Amount Claimed £17 + £0.33 interest @ 8% [89days x 0.00022 x £17]

vii) 1/2/06 Failed Direct Debit [£24.65] = £34 (£17 refunded 10/02/06) – Amount Claimed £17 + £0.33 interest @ 8% [89days x 0.00022 x £17]

viii) 1/2/06 Failed Direct Debit [£85.00] = £34 (£17 refunded 10/02/06) – Amount Claimed £17 + £0.33 interest @ 8% [89days x 0.00022 x £17]

ix) 6/3/06 Unauthorised Overdraft Charge = £25 – Amount Claimed £25 + £0.31 interest @ 8% [56days x 0.00022 x £25]

 

I believe that the contents of these particulars of claim are true.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That claim wording is far too long for the moneyclaim site. If you want to say that then you will need to fill in the N1 form and hand it in to a county court. If you do a seach using the words money claim and wording, you should find details of other submisions.

 

I think the juries out on which approach is better. Moneyclaim is quicker but the particulars of claim section is far too short. Going to the court is inconvenient and they may lose your form (as they did with me) but at least you can set out your claim more fully.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/08/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support there.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6583 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...