Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • looking like evri lost the parcel then or ni(c)ked it!! did you contact nike before the return? who provided the label and chose evri and paid for the postage you or Nike? 100's of like threads here spend a good few days reading a good 10-20 topics a day here after hitting evri or typing evri in our search top right in the red banner dx
    • Almost forgot Also in your complaint letter also make sure and add the comments that Manager made about your previous complaints to the Housing Association which had no relevance on the present matter of him attending your property to change the Locks. When it comes to dealing with Housing Associations you use their own Policies and Procedures against them and I know very well how they operate and how to deal with them even the difficult one's Which Housing Association are we dealing with?
    • retitled and moved to the postal forum. on what date did you return the item? and why did you return the items? were they faulty or simply not wanted. dx  
    • Thanks for that info.  It's all a bit too 'high-tech" for him now though.  It's all happened very swiftly. He doesn't understand 'apps' on phones.  He's never been able to ring overseas from his landline.  He could only use WhatsApp to make international calls on his mobile. But Barc don't offer calls via WA.  He doesn't use a pc anymore.  He's 000s of miles away. And his new partner doesn't speak English!   And he now seems incapable of holding a proper conversation.    My experience in the last year of trying to deal with Barc on his behalf (lots of different matters) has been awful.  They are a nightmare. He was always like a child - which is why I helped. He has assets here. I've helped him with them.  But w/o his funds I can't. There is also that one issue that I've read articles on - Barc don't want you to use them if you aren't in the uk.  Even the manager I know asked why he has a Barc account if he's overseas.  I pointed out that he has uk assets, was educated here, worked here all his life, gets a UK pension, and ... has a Barc mortgage
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.


      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Currys defective goods - Pursue complaint with retailer or claim under section 75 on credit card?

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then


Please click the "Report " link


at the bottom of one of the posts.


If you want to post a new story then


Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 



Recommended Posts

Hi All,


I made an online purchase for a premium hotpoint washing washing machine that cost nearly £600 including a whatever happens cover.


Goods arrived Wednesday 19th June, I have encountered nothing but problems since hence I am seeking advice.


Background - The washing machine strives on it's anti stain technology feature which I put to the test the very day of delivery

after running the first wash cycle on auto clean mode as per instructions in manual guide.

I used fairy washing powder and found after the cycle had ended the clothes were still stained.


Perplexed as to why this had happened I set about purchasing a more stronger detergent as I thought Fairy was quite mild.


The next wash I used persil liquid tabs that were placed directly in the drum,

this time after the cycle had ended not only did the clothes have the pre washing stains but it also now had new additional stains

from the liquid tablet which looked like blue watermarks on the coloured clothing.


I rang currys and encountered a long catalogue of blunders with customer service until eventually

an call out was made for an engineer to come out and inspect the machine.


I originally wanted a refund but I was told that the machine had to be diagnosed and fault found before a refund/exchange is offered.


Fast forward to when engineer arrived and this is when my real problem started

- Engineer asked me to demonstrate how I would start a wash cycle.


I explained I only used fairy washing powder once but have been using the liquid tablet which I place directly in the drum.


I thought I would demonstrate both methods; however when I started placing the washing powder in the soap dispenser

he corrected me immediately to say I used the wrong compartment.


Ok fault admitted, I inserted the washing powder in the wrong place.


So soap dispenser was taken out and rinsed thoroughly.


Next I showed how I would use the liquid tablets in the drum which I did correctly and he told me to start a program.


Once program had started engineer stated he thinks the problem should be fixed now as he believes it was a user error.


Hang on I said "what about my ruined clothing which was as a result of correctly using the liquid tablet in the drum"?


His response was it must have got trapped in the drum somewhere which shouldn't happen again.


in total he spent 15 minutes from arrival to finish and went away as he had other jobs.


Fuming that he did not return to review the wash cycle


I called Currys and experienced their rubbish service again about how to wait after wash cycle ends and check to see if clothes are still stained.


Two hours later the verdict was in - as expected clothes had been ruined again.


So back on the phone to Currys and again another encouter with an unhelpful member of staff who spoke to Hotpoint.


Hotpoint claim as no fault was found and it was user error,

I need to run the machine on auto clean mode so that it can get rid of any residue which was as a result of misuse.


Fine, I hang up and run the machine as per instructions on auto clean a good few times. The results after adding more dirty laundry - the same as before.


At the end of my tether I wrote a letter with pictures of ruined and dirty stained clothing

and emailed head office highlighting my concerns and requesting a refund under SOGA as goods are not as described in product specification and are not fit for purpose.


Currys called me today apologising for my experience but explained that they still need an engineer to inspect the machine again

as last engineer found no fault and placed blame on user error.


The representative used this excuse to his full advantage despite dismissing my claims that I have given Currys every opportunity to rectify the problem

and also implemented their suggestions of running the machine on auto clean mode to counteract any build up residue from the first cycle.


Furthermore he quoted me SOGA by saying I need to give them a chance to repair the problem before a refund could be issued.


He was very insisted and even wanted to try and arrange an independent engineer to come out at my expense.


I outrightly refused to pay for the engineer call out.


I am now awaiting to hear from him again as I asked what the protocol would be if I did allow another engineer to inspect the machine

as I do not want to find that like the last engineer they disappear again after a short while without viewing the end result.


Phew that was long!


Ok so now I need to know where do I stand with this legally?


Do I follow up Curry's suggestions and pass from pillar to post with no expected result in sight

or do I contact my credit card company and ask to put in a claim under section 75?


I have only had the machine for less than a month and have all the photographic evidence, letters and call logs as evidence to prove my case

however I need to know where I stand legally.


Any input would be greatly appreciated.


Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

currys first under SOGA


then if they wont play ball


section 75

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

oh and reclaim the USELESS ins


you don't need it



please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...