Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Charges that appear immediately


Guest
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I've received feedback from some NatWest customers that indicates in some cases NatWest are debiting their charges IMMEDIATELY, on the day they say the breach of contract occurred, rather than give a date in the future at which these charges will be debited.

 

If this is widespread, it may indicate a change of policy by the NatWest aimed at clawing the money from penalty charges in as quickly as possible.

 

If anyone has noticed this on their account, please detail it in this thread so that we can gauge if it is a new tactic employed by the NatWest that might harm account holders who are already struggling to keep in the black.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked my bank statements and they have been doing this at least as far back as 2001. In 2001 "Paid referral fee" £25 for items debited the previous day. In 2003, 11 direct debits unpaid over two days, £330 charges removed on the same two days. Isn't this in breach of the banking code- not giving a warning of charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've checked my bank statements and they have been doing this at least as far back as 2001. In 2001 "Paid referral fee" £25 for items debited the previous day. In 2003, 11 direct debits unpaid over two days, £330 charges removed on the same two days. Isn't this in breach of the banking code- not giving a warning of charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

natwest have always done this to me too, immediatly charging me

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

natwest have always done this to me too, immediatly charging me

Do you have a website? Add the following code to add a link to The Consumer Action Group:

 

<a href="http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk"><b><font color="#FF0000" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">The Consumer Action Group</font></b></a> - <font color="#FF9900" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Reclaim your rights as a consumer and reclaim your unfair bank charges! Free site with letter templates and helpful forum.</font>

 

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Natwest charge immediately on my business and personal accounts.

 

We've had the scenario of transferring money from 1 account to another online, to discover that although the cash shows up in the account it can't be used to pay bills BUT can be withdrawn at a cash machine immediately, to then have cheques and direct debits returned, then to be charged immediatley, for the bulk of the transfered money to be swallowed up by charges for the process to start all over again the following day. the confusing thing is is that the account shows that there's enough money in it to cover the outgoings it's just the cash can't be used for them!!?

 

I giggle everytime their "24/7" advert comes on the tv: I've learned the hard way that you have to conduct all transactions before 3pm for the following days business.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received feedback from some NatWest customers that indicates in some cases NatWest are debiting their charges IMMEDIATELY, on the day they say the breach of contract occurred, rather than give a date in the future at which these charges will be debited.

 

I thought this was standard procedure! I didn't know they did it any other way! :shock:

But then again, what do I know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like wise, I thought this was standard procedure as Natwest as always done that to me and even when i queried it, they told me the computer automatically charges you when there are insufficient funds and a transaction like a DD or SO or card use is going through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Both my husband and I have received 'Immediate Bank Charges' from Natwest. My husband was charged £38.00 for going £2.99 over his overdraft, resuting in him being over £40.00 over his overdraft, and of course that will attract intest charges.

I was charged £38.00 when my mobile phone provider requested my payment unexpectedly one month earlier than arranged. I had no opportunity to tell Natwest that I did not wish to pay Orange so I have ended up having to reclaim this money from Orange. You see Natwest are not interested in having a conversation with the customer, clawing in penalties is their game!

Blacksheep :x:x:Cry:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep NafWest always do this.

The ONLY positive thing NafWest do on a business account is early credit. My pay is due 14th of every month by BACs. If that falls on Sat or Sun, the money is always availbe from the Saturday, I don't have to wait until the Monday.

Apart from that the service is rubbish

Link to post
Share on other sites

if natwest have changed the policy and are trying to claw in the money-asap, what can be done then. does the whole idea of being able to claim back charges etc change.

would it also be true that unless you sign an agreement accepting this they legally cannot just change the policy on your account.

you must sign a contract. there is no contract between the bank and you,except for the one you sign.

QUOTE:you must have an offer and aggreement.this forms the contract.

i certainly didn t agree to any of the changes like card misuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only just found this site and its opening my eyes the more I read the more I cant believe what Im reading. However, I have been charged on the day for breaches of DD's etc. I have complained on more than one occassion, especially when i talked to somebody from natwest telephone banking to make sure there was enough money in to pay a direct debit. I was told that if I transfered money before 12am the night before then the money was in my account and the direct debit would be paid. However, in reality this wasnt paid I was charged £38 and when i phone to ask why as I had transfered the money over before 12am I was told that the credit lending dept will look at the balance of my account before close of their day which is 6.30pm and if the money is not in the account before that time then the DD will be unpaid and i will be charged £38.

 

I did get one refunded as they "listened" to the tape of the conversation I had with the advisor and said as a good will gesture they would refund the charges and in future dont do it again...

 

Its all a con,

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have only just found this site and its opening my eyes the more I read the more I cant believe what Im reading. However, I have been charged on the day for breaches of DD's etc. I have complained on more than one occassion, especially when i talked to somebody from natwest telephone banking to make sure there was enough money in to pay a direct debit. I was told that if I transfered money before 12am the night before then the money was in my account and the direct debit would be paid. However, in reality this wasnt paid I was charged £38 and when i phone to ask why as I had transfered the money over before 12am I was told that the credit lending dept will look at the balance of my account before close of their day which is 6.30pm and if the money is not in the account before that time then the DD will be unpaid and i will be charged £38.

 

I did get one refunded as they "listened" to the tape of the conversation I had with the advisor and said as a good will gesture they would refund the charges and in future dont do it again...

 

Its all a con,

 

Welcome. Please let us know if you decide to pursue Nat West for your money back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all, first post, long time Natwest customer!!

 

They have always charged me straight away and the most galling thing is knowing on a Friday night that things are gonna bounce, putting cash in at the branch on a Saturday, only to have them bounce the cheque/DD on the Monday because 'cash isn't verified until the next working day'. I though the cashier verified it when they took the cash from my hand and put it into a till and gave me a receipt??!!

 

Once a cheque bounced on a Monday. Fine, £35 charge, I'll ring them and get it back. But then on Friday they try to represent the cheque, and it's gonna bounce because there's no way I can get to a bank during the week and I didn't even know it would be represented as the cheque had been returned to the payee. So I call them and they say they will try to stop the cheque ('ten pound charge thankyou') and 'it will probably bounce but then if you call we will refund this charge'. It did bounce, and they under-refunded me later which is another story.

 

They should give notice like most others. They are quick enough to charge ridiculous fees instantly but then take a couple of days (Saturday to Monday night?!) to process cash they have in their hands.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whilst the Banking Code is voluntary, and therefore not enforcable, the following is an extract:

Paragraph 5.5 states "Before we take interest or charges for standard account services from your current or savings account, we will give you at least 14 days notice of how much we will take

and

Paragraph 5.4 states"We will tell you the charge for any other service or product before we provide that service or product, and at any time you ask."

 

Clearly the charges applied will fall under one of these two statements. As mentioned, the code is voluntary (boo!) but signatories to the code are also signatories to the Banking Code Rules, which are governed by the BCSB (Banking Code Standards Board)

 

I am not certain if the BCSB has teeth, but it is certainly worth considering these 'instant' charges in light of a body and code that the bank is signatory to.

 

I expect to have more information on this at a later stage, as I intend to raise the Banking Code in my next dealings with my bank.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have to say that I don't know why it wouldn't be enforceable. I think that it would be useful as a source of implied contractual terms.

I don't fancy a bank's chances if I relied upon the code in court.

 

I think that if it could be shown in court that the bank traded on the fact that they were signatories to the code and that in produced certain reasonable expectations in the consumer then it would be incorporated into the contract.

 

I see no real problem about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is why I am using it in my claim. There is a section on complaints (breaches) that I am focusing on.

 

In a nutshell it lists 7 factors that the BCSB take seriously when a complaint has been raised. I have broken down all 7 factors, and applied proof of my complaint to all.

 

I don't see how it can fail. However, if it does fail, then it will demonstrate the farce that is the code and the BCSB.

 

If you wish I will PM my argument to you - I want to keep it non-public until I have used it (don't want any snooping HSBC bods getting wind of it in advance)

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry - I didn't address the question. I believe it is not enforceable by virtue of the fact that the code is voluntary. However, I have yet to test the authority of the BCSB.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Welcome. Please let us know if you decide to pursue Nat West for your money back.

 

Yes I am going to go forward, opened a parachute account, sent the first letter requesting all of the information and have had the first reply. but i will open my own thread, and i will be contributing to your law books if I get my money back!

 

thanks so much you have been an inspiration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

This has been done for as far back as I can see - I keep 4 years of statements and thus can see the referral fee that was £25 is now £38. I had one of these on friday 9th Nov, in addition to £90 (made up of 3 charges) and even more from a different account.

 

Am taking action without a doubt!

 

Hope this helps

<--If you think this post was helpful, click on the scales underneath my alias and help me catch up with the others!!

 

Sky Broadband:

Requested 5/11/06

Letter 6/12/06

Equipment received 20/12/06

Connected 22/12/06

:)

Ongoing problems = 4.5 hours of calls

:x

Moved house 30/04/07

Not connected = 1.5 hours of calls

:x

Complained 16/05/07

New Equipment Received 21/05/07

Connected 25/05/07

:)

No problems with connection, await refund of calls / time ...

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 12 years later...

This topic was closed on 03/05/19.

If you have a problem which is similar to the issues raised in this topic, then please start a new thread and you will get help and support their.

If you would like to post up some information which is relevant to this particular topic then please flag the issue up to the site team and the thread will be reopened.

- Consumer Action Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6367 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...