Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hackers75 VS Barclays


Hackers75
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6251 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, I was redirected here from the Martin Lewis Website (I heard him talking about this on Radio 2 a few weeks back). What a wicked site. I feel very motivated reading other people's cases.

 

So here is my story so far...

6th October - Sent a letter to Barclays asking for details of all my statements going back 6 years.

12th October - received all my statements (but in a different format to normal)

16-20th October - Read through the website

20th October - Preparing to send my prelim letter claiming £2000 plus £381.63 overdraft interest

 

I hope someone can help me...I have used The Vampiress Google spreadsheet to calculate the overdraft interest but mine seems quite a high amount to claim in comparison to other threads I have read...I have redone it twice but still get the same figure am I doing something wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi - it depends on the spreadsheet you are using (compound contractual, or standard interest) and when the bulk of of your charges occurred. The more recent ones will have less interest than older ones. It's not easy to give an average figure as everyone's circumstances are different. £381 on £2000 doesn't sound excessive to me.

Jeep (The Wife & I)

Halifax joint a/c (£3800 charges + £40 interest on charges over 11 years) - paid in full 23/06/06

Halifax joint a/c new charges £1100 - LBA sent 02/08/06

Halifax 2nd a/c (£1500 charges + £150 interest on charges) - partial payment received 13/07/06 (no s69 interest) - AQ filed 07/08/06 - Court awarded 50% of s69 interest (Bank didn't turn up!)

Halifax Visa (#1) Data Protection Act sent - statements arrived - £350 so far

Halifax Visa (#2) Data Protection Act sent - refunded £170

DONATE - Support this site, it supported you!

Follow the route: FAQs > Template Library > Parachute Account > Bank Forums > Spreadsheet

All advice given in good faith and without prejudice or liability, to be taken at your own risk!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I received the standard letter from Mike Brophy "...I am sorry your unhappy...A full report or an update on our progress will be sent to you within eight weeks..."

 

Preparing the LBA letter (for posting on Friday). Bring it on Barclays, I look forward to having my money back and buying my wife something nice (after making a donation to you guys!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hello, I was redirected here from the Martin Lewis Website (I heard him talking about this on Radio 2 a few weeks back). What a wicked site. I feel very motivated reading other people's cases.

 

So here is my story so far...

6th October - Sent a letter to Barclays asking for details of all my statements going back 6 years.

12th October - received all my statements (but in a different format to normal)

16-20th October - Read through the website

20th October - Preparing to send my prelim letter claiming £2000 plus £381.63 overdraft interest

 

I hope someone can help me...I have used The Vampiress Google spreadsheet to calculate the overdraft interest but mine seems quite a high amount to claim in comparison to other threads I have read...I have redone it twice but still get the same figure am I doing something wrong.

Last edited by Hackers75 : 31st October 2006 at 17:20.

 

 

icon1.gif Re: Hackers75 VS Barclays

 

 

Hi - it depends on the spreadsheet you are using (compound contractual, or standard interest) and when the bulk of of your charges occurred. The more recent ones will have less interest than older ones. It's not easy to give an average figure as everyone's circumstances are different. £381 on £2000 doesn't sound excessive to me.

 

 

icon10.gif Re: Hackers75 VS Barclays

 

 

I received the standard letter from Mike Brophy "...I am sorry your unhappy...A full report or an update on our progress will be sent to you within eight weeks..."

 

 

Preparing the LBA letter (for posting on Friday). Bring it on Barclays, I look forward to having my money back and buying my wife something nice (after making a donation to you guys!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received a goodwill offer of £990 (less than half of what I'm due). Pah!!! Too little too late. Going to send them a letter saying I will accept this as a partial payment and they have 7 days to pay me the remainder or I shall take court action with no further notice.

 

Please can someone confirm this is the right thing to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Reference xxxxx

Account Number xxxx

Sort Code xxxxxx

With reference to the above, and to your letter dated 13 November 2006. I wish to thank you for your offer of £980 in respect of bank charges levied over the last six years on my account. I will be happy to accept this offer as an interim payment (not Full and Final Payment), but wish to inform Barclays that I require the outstanding balance of £1020 to be paid within 7 days.

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 7 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus a claim under ss.7 and 13 of the Data Protection Act 1998 plus my costs and without further notice.

Any amendments needed???

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have submitted my Mcol today :

 

The Claimant has an account xxxxxx with

the Defendant, opened July 1990 2. Since

12/11/99 the Defendant debited charges and

interest in respect of purported breaches

of contract. 3. Defendant is aware of all

details as a list of charges has already

been supplied. Another copy will be sent.

4. Claimant contends: (a) The charges

exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the

breaches; (b) The Term permitting the

Defendant to levy such charges is

unenforceable under the Unfair Terms in

Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, Unfair

Contract Terms Act 1977 and at Common Law.

5. Claimant claims: (a) return of the

amounts debited of £2000; (b) Interest per

S.69 County Courts Act 1984 of 8% -

£732.28 continuing at 8% until judgment or

settlement at a daily rate of £0.44; 6.

Alternatively, if the charges are a fee for

a service, then they must be reasonable

under S.15 of the Supply of Goods and

Services Act 1982.7. Costs allowed by the

Court.

 

Does this look right? I would be very grateful if someone can confirm and reassure me that all I have to do now is sit back and wait for Barclays to acknowledge the claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I respectfully suggest that you ask whether a certain text is OK BEFORE you submit it because it seems like putting the cart before the horse asking for reassurance now.

 

My POC was:

"The Claimant had a contract with the Defendant Your account number here from Approximate date account opened which was conducted on their standard terms and conditions. The Claimant claims the return of £ amount before adding % age levied by the defendant in the way of charges. The charges are a disproportionate penalty and therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977s.4 and under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regs 1999, Para 8 and sch.2(1)(e). In the event that the charges are not a penalty, they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. The defendant has been asked to justify the charges but they have declined to do so. The Claimant claims interest under s.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% a year from Date of the first of their charges against you to Date of the last charge of £ place the 8% figure here and also interest at the same rate up to the date of judgement or earlier payment at a daily rate of multiply your amount before interest by 0.0002 and put here (Mine is £0.45).

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Nightmare!!! Barclays acknowledged my claim yesterday (14th day is today). Then I re-read my particulars of claim and realised I had made a mistake. I forgot to include the interest in the Amount claimed box so I was claiming £2000 instead of £2732. Also notice that I was claiming charges back to 1999. Called Northampton County court and spoke to a very helpful lady who told me I need to fill in another N1 form send them a cheque for £35 (payable to HMCS) and complete a N244. Please can someone help me with the N244 form http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_0400.pdf

 

Thank you very much in advance and I realise that I am a muppet!!!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Basic Court Bundle is here:http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/33060-basic-court-bundle.html#post257960

 

Along with the hearing date the Judge will probably have provided directions such as documents to be submitted and deadlines to be met eg all evidence to be submitted to courts and defendant 14 days before hearing etc.

 

Peter

PETER RABBIT V BARCLAYS Settled in Full 05 March 2007

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a court date on 12 MARCH 2007!!!!!

 

That's pretty quick - where do you live? Which court. Mine's apparently booked up until May.

S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) sent 06/11/2006 - no statements yet

Prelim Letter sent 13/11/2006

"Sorry you're unhappy" received 16/11/2006

LBA sent 27/11/2006

Reply to LBA with 50% offer received 01/12/2006

"Thanks, but no Thanks" sent 01/12/2006

MOCL filed 11/12/06 - deemed served 17/12/06

MOCL acknowledged 29/12/06

Non compliance with S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) letter sent 04/01/07

Statements Received 08/01/07

MOCL Defended 12/01/07

AQ received 17/01/07

AQ done and delivered 19/01/07

Court date 22/05/2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree that the court date is very quick - some people are getting dates for June! Check the letter again is it a full hearing or a prelim. If your not sure post the content of the letter here and someone will advise.

 

As for the Bundle don't panic!! It is not as mind blowing as you first think!

 

You should already have your schedule of charges, statements and all the correspondence - well thats the main part of it.

 

Print off a copy of the Bundle from the templates on here and have a look through it is made up of several sections. I copied each section into a new word document and then printed them off seperately.

 

Once you have every thing (as per the list of documents as shown on the first page of the bundle template) put everything in the correct order in a ringbinder or similar and number each page (this can be done by hand).

 

Once everything is numbered type up a list of contents with page numbers, add a cover page. Then off to the photocopier and make two copies and the jobs done. But dont leave it until the last minute or your will run out of ink in your printer or get or your pages in the wrong order. I did mine in the office on a Sunday so I wasnt disturbed.

 

Send me a PM if you need any help.

 

Peter

PETER RABBIT V BARCLAYS Settled in Full 05 March 2007

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

2 threads merged

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...