Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell and vanquis issues summons county court help!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3810 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

In respect of counterclaiming. I was correct, you should have made any counter claim at the time of submitting your defence as a "part 20" claim.

 

If you wish to do this after submitting your defence you will need to make an application to the court for permission - there is a fee for this and also a risk of further costs.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 88
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

you can levy Compound int from the date of each PENALTY charges

to the date they settle [ this will be in restitution]

 

In respect of counterclaiming. I was correct, you should have made any counter claim at the time of submitting your defence as a "part 20" claim.

 

If you wish to do this after submitting your defence you will need to make an application to the court for permission - there is a fee for this and also a risk of further costs.

 

 

thanks for this folks your all helping alot.

sorry I havnt been here but its all been a bit of a nightmare.

we have just had a misscarriage and ive had to take my dad for his cancer treatment.

all in all a rubbish sept.

 

So back to the fight. can i just confirm

 

1. yes I can counter claim but I will need to wait for the court to be allocated and then ask which ever judge I get. I understand I will have to pqy

2. Its from the date the charge was levied to the date i submit my papers and then 8% from then on until the court date or they walk away

(Im happy with evryone walking away as this is my last contestable debt)

3. what form do I use for the counterclaim?

 

cheers folks your all a great help at this time

 

Geoff

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

condolences

as i understand you have the aq, but not returned yet? is this small claims, or?

as you didn't do one with your defence looks like you would need the courts permission.

can the aq include request for such permission? otherwise, prob in form such as n244.

in any case, once permission then would need to file particulars of the counterclaim (cpr 20.4)

see post #68

double check

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

CISheet v101.xls

 

put their int rate in cell d 15

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

condolences

as i understand you have the aq, but not returned yet? is this small claims, or?

as you didn't do one with your defence looks like you would need the courts permission.

can the aq include request for such permission? otherwise, prob in form such as n244.

in any case, once permission then would need to file particulars of the counterclaim (cpr 20.4)

see post #68

double check

 

i have returned the AQ as it had to be in by the 16th.

It is the small claims track.

 

the defence is that I have had an account with vanquis but they wont send me any paperwork to prove that the account has a CCA , or a default notice etc..

. They havent sent anything.

It is now awaiting allocation to the local court.

 

However I have now had a chance to go through all the paperwork sent and have found a number of late payment etc charges and these have been put in the CI calculator.

if they apply upto the date that vanquis sold the account it comes to about £700.

 

If they apply upto the date of settlement, for instance the begining of my claim being lodeged it comes to £2600 .

 

The balance being sought by lowells is £2400.

 

Now bearing in mind there was no paperwork prior to defence having to be submitted

I am hoping I can apply to the judge, when it is allocated one, to counter claim now that the account info has been supplied.

 

im not bothered about getting ny excess money out of vanquis or lowells I just would be happy with them walking away.

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok. they prob won't have an actual copy of your dn (even if one was actually sent), but they would ordinarily need to show on balance that one was sent, and was compliant. though without any proof to the contrary it may be difficult to rebut compliance assuming j accepts one was sent. does the sar info come up with their comms logs re things in/out?

as for original agreement paperwork, maybe they don't have any, which could be also one reason for their non reply to your cpr request (it being small claims could be another).

check with andyorch etc re doing your counter claim etc.

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

just to add, you mention poss having to amend defence as well. afaik, this can be done with the consent of the claimant if they agree, and if they don't consent then with the courts permission. cpr 17. nb poss costs consequences may ensue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi, ok some important questions and some help please. It all went quiet for a while after I was told it was being sent to my local court. I havn't filed a counter claim yet as I was told by the bulk court to do nothing until I heard from my local court. That was about a month ago. Anyway today a lot of papers arrive from the Chelmsford county court. they state that the hearing will be on the 19th december at the small claims court. Right the thing i need help with is the following. 1.What form do I use to send to the court for a counter claim and if claiming for compound interest am I claiming for restitution? 2.If so any idea where I could find particulars of cliam for that. they are just penaltycharges (late payment etc) pretty standard and I have done the CI sheet. 3. I take it i agree to mediation? But also I would like to get the counterclaim in before that starts as it will give me a bit more leverage 4.What documents do I have to send them? All I have is the SAR they sent me and the original letters asking for the account to be suspended due to finincial hardship (wife lost job) all ignored. Then the CCA request then the debt not acknowledged letter. All pretty much ignored. only one answered was the CCa request with aphotocopy ot t&c's. 5.Can I ask for disclosure order from the judge as they still havnt sent a CCA even with the SAR request and I still have never seen one. If so what form do I use? Please help as the deadline is now approaching Geoff

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok Im going to go the n whatever it is asking for disclosure and ppermission to counter claim.

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Defendant is asking the court to make an order for the following.

 

The defendant seeks the disclosure and the production of a verified and legible copy of each of the following documents mentioned in the Particulars of Claim:

 

1: the original signed credit agreement as regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974. If the document relied on is a document bearing an electronic signature then the defendant requests that there is verifiable proof that this document is linked to the defendant and contains all of the prescribed terms.

 

2: the document assignment showing the claimant has a right to enforce this agreement

 

3: statement of account or statements showing how the amount being claimed has accrued. This statement should include any default/penalty payments.

 

4: default notice The Claimant was asked by letter (recorded delivery) on the 16th June 2013 for copies of this document in order that the claimant could file a defence. They refused to provide copies of these documents. It is impossible for the defendant to mount any comprehensive defence unless these documents are made available for inspection. The Claimants Particulars of claim are vague and give no details regarding these documents, how or where they were signed, the contents or indeed if the claimant has any right to enforce any alleged debt.

 

The defendant maintains that without the ability to mount a comprehensive defence then the interests of justice are not being served and requests that if these documents are not supplied within 28 days this action is without merit and the claimants case should be struck out. The defendant also requests that the court allow the defendant a stay of 28 days in order to file a counter claim against the defendant. The reasons for this are as follows; The Claimant brought this case against the defendant and supplied no supporting documentation before filing their claim.

 

The defendant was compelled to acknowledge the service within strict time limits and file a defence with only vague and limited information. In the meantime the defendant made a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act in order to obtain details of this account. This request took approximately 28 days to arrive. After that time the defendant has had time to study the account details and now believes that the Claimant has levied unjust penalty charges on the account and charged a rate of compound interest at 29%.

 

The defendant maintains that this constitutes unjust enrichment by the claimant and wishes to claim these monies back from the claimant. The amount of money the defendant wishes to claim is £2500 which is more than being claimed by the claimant.

 

It is requested that the court orders a stay of 28 days in order that the claimant may be compelled to disclose the above documents and that the defendant be allowed to file a counter claim against the Claimant.

Edited by citizenB
formatting

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Point 4 - the default notice - was this requested by "letter" or by way of CPR31.14 ?

 

Aside from which, it is most unlikely you would receive a copy as these are templates with the account holder's details inserted.

 

They could provide a "sample", but that would not prove there was any incorrect information or non compliance with the mandatory/statutory requirements.

 

The best they could do, I would think, would be to provide evidence by way of their communication logs that one was printed / sent.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

finlander, we are not quite sure what you are asking of us. Are you wanting to submit an application to force the opposition to disclose documents to you ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry prob not being clear.

 

The default notice was requested as part of the disclousre and so was the credit agreement.

 

Nothing has been sent .

 

No reply

 

What Im trying to do is avoid being ambushed by being sent all these documents as part of the claimants bundle 14 days before court.

 

Im trying to get the judge to say give him the docs now and give him time to study them.

 

I am hoping to get some disclosure before hand as at the moment they have disclosed nothing.

 

That makes defending very difficult.

 

Also I want to ask the judge for permission to counter claim.

 

I couldnt earlier because I didnt have the account information until recently.

 

When I spoke to MCOL they said wait until a judge is allocated then ask him.

 

What I need to know is how to ask him?

 

Geoff

Strategy without tactics is the slowest route to victory. Tactics without strategy is the noise before defeat.Thus, what is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy. What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations.

 

Sun Tzu 'The art of war'

POST THE LETTER AND SIGN THE PETITION AT POST 88 ON THE LINK BELOW TO GET THE OFT TO INVESTIGATE THE CRA'S

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/campaign/153512-campaign-oft-against-unfair.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

.........

Also I want to ask the judge for permission to counter claim.

 

I couldnt earlier because I didnt have the account information until recently.

 

When I spoke to MCOL they said wait until a judge is allocated then ask him.

 

What I need to know is how to ask him?

 

Geoff

 

 

see civil procedure rule part 20.4 etc and associated Practice Direction 20 para 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 etc ie if permission is required then via an 'application notice' including the (now) 'additional claim'?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...