Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

E.ON HeatWise EnergyPlan becomes E.ON EnergyPlan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3943 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

E.ON changed my "plan" [see "title"] (January 18th 2013), presumably at the behest of "D.E.C.C."...another one of "Dave's" BIG-IDEAS!!! I now have no control over "on-line" account management...submitted "meter-readings" are refused. I have five circuits; "Day", "Night", "Boost", "Heatwise" and "Heatwise night". Now, because my "Heatwise..." consumption has fallen to zero (I do not use heating during these Summer-Months)...E.ON have decided that "your consumption is inconsistent with your usual useage"...consequently my on-line submitted readings are refused! They (E.ON) promptly invoiced me for a Bill, which is not due...I refused to pay; my payment history is impeccable...I pay quarterly "on demand"...THIS IS INTOLERABLE.

E.ON extol the virtues of "on-line" account management but they are unable to "deliver"...this is clearly misrepresentation.

I strongly urge every customer of E.ON to switch !

I have (had) a perfectly satisfactory [contract] with E.ON for thirteen years; this is a debacle.

It is clear, from my correspondence with D.E.C.C. that this [situation] is due to "lobbying" by the "Big six"; of which E.ON are one. The introduction of "simplified tariffs" is simply a manifestation of this Government's failure to address [our] lack of an energy-strategy; we are now "paying-the-price" of failure! The only long-term solution is to invest in "Nuclear"; meanwhile, us consumers have to pay-the-price of [futile] "experiments" with WIND!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi elector

 

From 18 January 2013, we've modified the names of certain tariffs. The name of your tariff has changed from E.ON HeatWise EnergyPlan to E.ON EnergyPlan. The name change is descriptive only and has no impact on your account.

 

This is also unconnected to the online management service. If you're having problems entering meter readings online, this will be another, unrelated issue and you need to talk to us about this. We've a specialist team who look after the online service and they'll be happy to help.

 

Customers managing their accounts online receive quarterly bills. Recently, though, we've been tweaking our systems to make sure billing dates are correctly aligned with meter reader visits. This is to improve accuracy by reducing the number of estimated bills. In some cases, this may result in an interim bill.

 

Not saying this has happened to you but certainly a possibility. If it did, future billing will revert to quarterly.

 

Sorry for any confusion but hope this explains the changes.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Now Malc,

 

Let's get some facts straight, here..."Just the Facts" !...

 

FIRSTLY

 

"The name change is descriptive only and has no impact on your account."

The Impact on my account is that my standing-charge has increased from £37.97(48) p.a. to £142.49(6) p.a. This was the ""paying-the-price"-of failure" point in my original thread; The "Lobbying" & subsequent introduction of "simplified tarriffs" is simply a consequence of (your) failure to establish a credible Energy-Strategy...witness the warning recently announced that "Industry & Commerce may well need to prepare for Energy-Rationing between the hours of 16:00 to 20:00, this coming Winter (2013/2014). Now, you may claim that the premium I now face is to help pay for "Infrastructure & Maintenance" of the Network...I would suggest that that's a euphemism for "Help, please? We're in the mire. We need some extra cash to throw-at anything we can think of; including futile experiments with Wind, and Wave"...I rest my case!

 

SECONDLY

 

"This is also unconnected to the online management service. If you're having problems entering meter readings online, this will be another, unrelated issue "

Not wishing to tip-the-apple-cart here, but, this most definitely IS related. Your on-line account management no longer functions!...your highly-skilled & qualified I.T. department are unable to accommodate the fact that my power-consumption has (suddenly) dropped to zero...Hey, it's Summer :|...I don't use my heating, right now!!! If you must place a window over my useage-pattern, at least make it recognise that I've switched my heating off and stop telling me that "(your) consumption is inconsistent with (your) usual useage"...I would like to resume Managing my Account on-line, for now...This is impossible!!!

 

:-x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi elector

 

The change to Standing Charges isn't an additional amount but another way of charging for the cost of the connection. We've always charged this but in a different way.

 

Heatwise meters, like the one at your property, are multi-rate set ups. They give 10 hours of cheaper electricity at certain off peak times for heating/water heating purposes. Included in this are a number of cheaper off peak hours for all consumption.

 

As such, these set ups have two supply numbers. One covers the Heatwise circuits for heating/water heating whilst the second is for the remaining circuits.

 

Previously, the Heatwise section carried a Standing Charge but the other part of the set up was charged under the two tier structure.

 

Here, the first 225 kWh per quarter or primary units were charged at a premium rate. This premium was to cover the costs of the connection. We've now changed to a Standing Charge for the connection plus an amount for the electricity used.

 

Before 18 January 13, customers on the Heatwise tariff were charged in the region of £150 per year for their connection. This was a combination of the Heatwise Standing Charge plus the extra charged via the primary rate.

 

This figure is based on customers using in excess of 900 kWh per year. Those using less won't have been paying as much as this.

 

We've now replaced two tier charges with a daily Standing Charge on all our tariffs. Consequently, Heatwise customers will now have two Standing Charges to cover both supply numbers.

 

Going forward, as you say, this will now be a set charge of £142.49.

 

I hope this explains that the switch to a Standing Charge isn't an additional charge. It's something we've always charged but in a different way.

 

Our unit rates, though, did go up on 18 January 13.

 

The online issue isn't related to our tariff changes. I'm aware of a difficulty some customers are currently having when entering meter readings online. This is only affecting certain accounts and isn't specific to particular types of meter. We're working on a fix but, in the meantime, if you let us have up to date readings we'll be happy to re-bill your account accurately. You can call us or email in if you prefer.

 

Sorry about this but all other online services are working.

 

Malc

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...