Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

clarity chasing egg debt


emmyjay8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3961 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Just received my second letter from Clarity. They say they are acting on behalf of ARROW GLOBAL LIMITED (their client), Original Lender: EGG who i had a Loan debt with well over 6 years ago!! :| They are "offering" me a Reduced Settlement/Affordable Payment Plan!!

 

As the debt is well over 6 years (2006), am i right in believing there is nothing they can do to chase it up?? :-x

Emma

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Have you paid anything towards this or acknowledged the alleged debt in writing AT ANY POINT within the last 6 years? If not, and you are certain of this, then it's Statute Barred and you can let them know by template letter.

Is there anything showing on your Credit file?

If they are offering a "reduced settlement figure" then the chances are that it's either statute barred (and they're hoping you don't know that) or there's something wrong with the original agreement - either unenforceable or they don't have one.

Don't phone them - EVER.

See what the next letter brings and if you think it IS statute barred, use the letter template in the CAG library and amend it to your own circumstances.

 

 

Good luck, if you need any more info, let us know.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent email to them on 6th June 2013 as follows:

Dear Sir/Madam

Account No
: **********

Original Creditor:
Egg

Clarity Ref:
CCM******

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement and a full breakdown of the account including any interest or charges applied.

I understand that under the
Consumer Credit Act 1974 [sections 77-79],
I am entitled to receive copy of my Credit Agreement and a Statement of Account on request.

I understand a copy of my Credit Agreement and Statement of Account should be supplied within
12 working days
.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, Creditors are
unable
to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with the request for a Copy of the Agreement and Statement of Account under these sections of the Act.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours faithfully

 

Their response by email on 10th June 2013 was as follows:

Good Afternoon,

In response to your email, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1), our client has requested payment of £1.00 to obtain a copy of the agreement.

Please make your cheque payable to Arrow Global Ltd and send to Clarity Credit Management using the address below.

Kind Regards

Diana Castagnaro Gerrett

Specialist Collections Advisor

Tel:
0844 561 1715

Email:

Web:
www.claritycreditmanagement.co.uk

 

 

Haven't responded to them since, not sure if I should bother sending off the £1.00 they requested paid to "
Arrow Global Ltd
"??
:|

 

What you think?

 

:-)

Emma

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sent email to them on 6th June 2013 as follows:

Dear Sir/Madam

Account No
: **********

Original Creditor:
Egg

Clarity Ref:
CCM******

With reference to the above agreement, I would be grateful if you would send me a copy of this credit agreement and a full breakdown of the account including any interest or charges applied.

I understand that under the
Consumer Credit Act 1974 [sections 77-79],
I am entitled to receive copy of my Credit Agreement and a Statement of Account on request.

I understand a copy of my Credit Agreement and Statement of Account should be supplied within
12 working days
.

I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974, Creditors are
unable
to enforce an agreement if they fail to comply with the request for a Copy of the Agreement and Statement of Account under these sections of the Act.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Yours faithfully

 

Their response by email on 10th June 2013 was as follows:

Good Afternoon,

In response to your email, under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1), our client has requested payment of £1.00 to obtain a copy of the agreement.

Please make your cheque payable to Arrow Global Ltd and send to Clarity Credit Management using the address below.

Kind Regards

Diana Castagnaro Gerrett

Specialist Collections Advisor

Tel:
0844 561 1715

Email:

Web:
www.claritycreditmanagement.co.uk

 

 

Haven't responded to them since, not sure if I should bother sending off the £1.00 they requested paid to "
Arrow Global Ltd
"??
:|

 

What you think?

 

:-)

Emma

Link to post
Share on other sites

The £1 fee is standard for a CCA request. Often the best approach is to send it to the OC, although if a company are "acting on behalf of" or have bought the alleged debt, they have a responsibility to either respond directly or pass on your request.

Send a Postal Order marked "For CCA Request fee payment only" - scan it or photograph it before send ing (so you have proof) and keep both the receipt and counterfoil.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Halibutt,

 

Haven't got around yet to sending off the fee for CCA but did actually receive another letter in post today from them as follows:

 

Dear Miss .........

MAKE ME AN OFFER

Original Lender: EGG

Our Client: ARROW GLOBAL LIMITED

Account No: ...............................

Clarity Ref: ..............................

Balance: £963.27

Our client will shortly recall your case for further action.

[As time is running out our client has advised us that they will consider any offer, however small, to settle the balance. Settlement could be via a one off payment or a series of payments.]

I very much hope that you can take advantage of this offer. However, if you are not in a position to do so then you should contact us and tell us about your current situation.

That way we can work with you and advise you on the best course of action.

 

We very much look forward to hearing from you. Call us on 0844 561 1715

Yours sincerely

 

Collections Department

 

:???: :???:

 

What do you think I should do about this latest response? Just ignore? The debt isn't even on my credit file!! :|

xx

Emma

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Emmyjay,

 

Any offer of a reduced settlement figure usually means that there's something wrong with the paperwork or perhaps the allegd debt is statute barred.

You've checked your credit reference file and the account doesn't appear on it.

Have you made any payments to the account or acknowledged it in writing in the last 6 years?

 

If not, it could well be statute barred. IF you are sure that it is, then you can send them the Statute Barred letter in the CAG library and amend it to your own circumstances. Sending that letter does not re-set the SB clock. Send by Post Office Recorded Delivery and print your name, don't sign it.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hallibutt,

 

Think it is well over 6 years, statue barred indeed! :jaw:

Haven't made one single payment or acknowledged the debt in question, nor do I intend to :wink: Shall follow with letter!!

 

:whoo:

Emma

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you're certain, then yes, send the Statute Barred letter. It is then up to the OC to prove that the account is not SB.

Make sure that you include the statement that they should no longer pursue the account as you have no intention of paying.

 

Sometimes, a creditor will argue the SB date, but it should start from the official original date of default. If that has now gone from your CRA file, then you should be ok.

 

Send the letter R/D and good luck.

 

H. x

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

own thread created

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...