Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Another one. Apparently this has been hushed up for about three months. They're working through their majority quite fast with all the sackings. Not that they've done anything about Menzies yet but he sounds like a blackmail risk. Here's the original article.   Revealed: Tory MP allegedly demanded campaign cash to pay ‘bad people’ ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 07:32:33 UTC  
    • and another one   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses Never mind losing whip - how about criminal charges   MP Mark Menzies loses Tory whip as party investigates claims he misused funds WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK The Fylde MP is alleged to have used campaign funds to pay off ‘bad people’ and cover medical expenses According to the The Times, £14,000 given by donors for use on Tory campaign activities was transferred to Mr Menzies’ personal bank accounts and used for private medical expenses. The MP, who is one of Rishi Sunak’s trade envoys, is also said to have called his 78-year-old former campaign manager at 3.15am one day in December, claiming he was locked in a flat and needed £5,000 as a matter of “life and death”. The sum, which rose to £6,500, was eventually paid by his office manager from her personal bank account and subsequently reimbursed from funds raised from donors   "According to a source close to Mr Menzies, the MP had met a man on an online dating website and gone to the man’s flat, before subsequently going with another man to a second address where he continued drinking. He was sick at one point and several people at the address demanded £5,000, claiming it was for cleaning up and other expenses."   Hes supposed to use funding from Taxpayers and doners for a life of service, not funding a life of drink and debauchery Hope his parliamentary expenses are also investigated.   In fact, perhaps Mr Bates next role in life should be as an independent investigator of Parliamentary expenses?
    • He asked for that one, didn't he?
    • Trump was unable to make it through the first day of court without falling asleep on Monday, which sparked a whole host of jokes, memes and even a new nickname, 'Dozy Don'    
    • The shift to card and contactless technology in the past decade has been rapid - not just in Britain, but in all sorts of remote pockets of the world. This is yet a further sign of it.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Missed penalty letters and fined, now warrant of distress??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, hopefully someone can help me. Many months ago, my wife was stopped at the train station by an inspector and couldn't find her ticket. She offered to pay the £20 fine then and there but was refused and told she'd get a letter in the mail to pay. Much time passed, we forgot about it, and then over the span of a few months, a couple of letters came for her, however her surname was spelled incorrectly so I assumed them to be junk mail which she gets a lot of, wrote "return to sender" and posted them back.

 

Finally another letter like this came and she decided to open it. Inside, was a notice from the West Midlands Central Finance Unit saying she now owed £338 and if she didn't pay in full, they will do one of many things, including:

 

Issue a warrant of distress for purpose of levying sum due; Register the account in the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines, restricting credit options and loans and mortgages; Make an attachment of Earnings Order to deduct from her salary; Make a vehicle clamping order;

 

And the most worrying: Refer her case to court, which may decide to issue a warrant without bail for her arrest, increase her fine by 50%, enforce the case at the County Court or High court by applying for a charging order or other court order, or SEND HER TO PRISON!

 

My wife is not registered at my address, on any utility bills of any sort, nor is she employed as she recently graduated University. She is American, here on a visa, and we are planning on moving to the states in about a year so there is really nothing they could do on that list other than imprison her, it seems. I'm very worried, we don't have the money to pay this right now as I've recently enrolled in a debt management program to get our finances under control for us to move.

 

What can I do about this? Can we call them and explain the situation of her not receiving the letters due to her name being spelled incorrectly? I'm happy for us to pay the original fine, but this is outrageous for us right now. Will they really try to arrest her? Please, any help possible is welcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, hopefully someone can help me. Many months ago, my wife was stopped at the train station by an inspector and couldn't find her ticket. She offered to pay the £20 fine then and there but was refused and told she'd get a letter in the mail to pay. Much time passed, we forgot about it, and then over the span of a few months, a couple of letters came for her, however her surname was spelled incorrectly so I assumed them to be junk mail which she gets a lot of, wrote "return to sender" and posted them back.

 

Finally another letter like this came and she decided to open it. Inside, was a notice from the West Midlands Central Finance Unit saying she now owed £338 and if she didn't pay in full, they will do one of many things, including:

 

Issue a warrant of distress for purpose of levying sum due; Register the account in the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines, restricting credit options and loans and mortgages; Make an attachment of Earnings Order to deduct from her salary; Make a vehicle clamping order;

 

And the most worrying: Refer her case to court, which may decide to issue a warrant without bail for her arrest, increase her fine by 50%, enforce the case at the County Court or High court by applying for a charging order or other court order, or SEND HER TO PRISON!

 

My wife is not registered at my address, on any utility bills of any sort, nor is she employed as she recently graduated University. She is American, here on a visa, and we are planning on moving to the states in about a year so there is really nothing they could do on that list other than imprison her, it seems. I'm very worried, we don't have the money to pay this right now as I've recently enrolled in a debt management program to get our finances under control for us to move.

 

What can I do about this? Can we call them and explain the situation of her not receiving the letters due to her name being spelled incorrectly? I'm happy for us to pay the original fine, but this is outrageous for us right now. Will they really try to arrest her? Please, any help possible is welcome.

 

Hello and welcome to CAG.

 

I hope the transport guys will be along later with advice for you.

 

To my amateur eye, it looks as if you have returned letters about a court case that has gone ahead in your wife's absence. Is this finance unit part of HM Courts Service?

 

You need to deal with this and the guys will know what to do. You may be able to turn the clock back with a statutory declaration, but please wait for the people in the know to turn up to confirm or deny this.

 

Do you know what sentence was passed on your wife? I hope she hasn't got a criminal record now.

 

My best, HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, thank you for the reply. I don't think any sentence has been passed on her yet. I believe they are implying they will pass a sentence on her if this money isn't paid.

 

I forgot to add that it says we have a right to appeal to the Court against the Fine Officer's decision in writing within 10 working days, but it says include written evidence which we do not have, nor do I know what they'd even want in that area. This is her first offence so I don't know if that will help. I read on this website if we grovel in the letter than can help? We are very desperate.

 

I don't know if they are part of the HM Courts Service, it just says West Midlands Central Finance Unit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this on the interweb. Is that the address on the letter you have?

 

All Transfer of Fine Orders and Payments must be made to the following address:- The Central Finance Unit, Dept 05 CY, Victoria Law Courts, Corporation Street, Birmingham B4 6QF

 

If it is, I'd guess that they're looking for a fine to be paid. If you have no other paperwork, it might be worth a phone call to them to find out what's involved and which court the case was held at, if it's the case.

 

Then I believe you can ring the court involved to find out what happened at your wife's hearing, assuming there was one.

 

Otherwise you're going to spend the weekend wondering what's happened.

 

HB

Edited by honeybee13

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, that is them. If I find out from them what court the case was held at, do I need to contact the court itself and see if they'll help me? Or do I just contact the Finance Unit itself? I apologise for the questions as you've said to wait for the transport guys to see this and help me, I'm just very ignorant when it comes to matters such as this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello again.

 

I would ring the finance unit and see if they can tell you a date on which a case was held and which court, and hopefully a reference for it. I just edited my last post to say then you can ring the court to find out what went on. You have an hour or two to try and find people.

 

The transport guys will be able to help once we know what you're facing, but for now I think we need information,

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I unfortunately won't be able to call today as I'm about to be pulled into a meeting and haven't been able to get a hold of my wife so it will have to wait until Monday. When I do find out, can I come back onto this thread and post what I've learned or should I start a new thread? Thank you for the guidance so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's a shame. I'm sure you understand that advice will be limited as things stand, as it will be guesswork for now.

 

Yes, please come back when you know what's what. It's best to continue with this thread because it already has information about your problem. Thank you for asking. :)

 

HB

Illegitimi non carborundum

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with HB (as in limited info, easier to advise when we hear the details).

 

A "no-bail" warrant certainly suggests this is from a fine for a criminal conviction, rather than a civil court case, so it sounds like "missed penalty fare, court case in her absence, found guilty in her absence, court fine unpaid".

 

A statutory declaration would "reset the clock", BUT which point in proceedings would you wish it reset to?.

It is unlikely you'll get things reset to the penalty fare stage (since you admit you knew a penalty fare was due).

 

You MIGHT get it reset to the court hearing stage, but :

a) is it likely you'll get anything other than "guilty"? (If a Bylaw prosecution and if she wasn't able to produce a valid ticket on demand,

b) the court might decline a statutory declaration given you received the court's correspondence but sent it back : how "wrong" were the details (can you give us an example : not using your wife's actual name! but an analogy)

So, if your wife's name is "Andrea Wilson" was the paperwork addressed to (as examples)

i) Andreas Wilson

ii) Andrea Wislon, or

iii) Andrew Smith. ?

The latter you might reasonably have sent back, but the former 2 a court might decide you should have acted upon and were trying to duck your responsibilities ......

 

What do you currently seek to conclude matters?

Once we know your expectations and if they are reasonable, and the full details, it will be easier to advise.

 

If your wife now has a criminal conviction (which a fine from a criminal case would suggest) - what is her immigration status, and would a conviction impact upon it?

Edited by BazzaS
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello, hopefully someone can help me. Many months ago, my wife was stopped at the train station by an inspector and couldn't find her ticket. She offered to pay the £20 fine then and there but was refused and told she'd get a letter in the mail to pay. Much time passed, we forgot about it, and then over the span of a few months, a couple of letters came for her, however her surname was spelled incorrectly so I assumed them to be junk mail which she gets a lot of, wrote "return to sender" and posted them back.

 

Finally another letter like this came and she decided to open it. Inside, was a notice from the West Midlands Central Finance Unit saying she now owed £338 and if she didn't pay in full, they will do one of many things, including:

 

Issue a warrant of distress for purpose of levying sum due; Register the account in the Register of Judgements, Orders and Fines, restricting credit options and loans and mortgages; Make an attachment of Earnings Order to deduct from her salary; Make a vehicle clamping order;

 

And the most worrying: Refer her case to court, which may decide to issue a warrant without bail for her arrest, increase her fine by 50%, enforce the case at the County Court or High court by applying for a charging order or other court order, or SEND HER TO PRISON!

 

My wife is not registered at my address, on any utility bills of any sort, nor is she employed as she recently graduated University. She is American, here on a visa, and we are planning on moving to the states in about a year so there is really nothing they could do on that list other than imprison her, it seems. I'm very worried, we don't have the money to pay this right now as I've recently enrolled in a debt management program to get our finances under control for us to move.

 

What can I do about this? Can we call them and explain the situation of her not receiving the letters due to her name being spelled incorrectly? I'm happy for us to pay the original fine, but this is outrageous for us right now. Will they really try to arrest her? Please, any help possible is welcome.

 

Reading this again, I have a further query.

 

If given a £20 penalty fare, one can't pay the penalty fare at the time to the rail staff, but are given a form to send in with the payment.

If no form was given but instead your wife was told "you'll receive a letter" : it sounds like this had escalated from a penalty fare to the member of staff thinking there was some element of fare evasion.

 

Usually the TOC then writes, asking for your comments, and based on any reply (or non-reply) decides on any prosecution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wrote a long reply but I think it is probably unnecessary. Long story short, her immigration is fine, I've agreed for us to make payments on the fine as they said appealing makes it more expensive because it has to go to a higher court and I'd rather avoid all of that for her sake. I don't think there is much else we can do at this point. Thank you all for the advice.

Edited by Stvtv
Link to post
Share on other sites

Bazza is spot-on.

 

There would have been at least one letter from the TOC (similar to the two that you say you marked 'Return to sender') and that would have been followed by a Summons to Court.

 

Just one thing, I'm intrigued as to how you knew the two letters that you did receive related to this matter if (because of the miss-spelling) you didn't open them and marked them 'Return to sender' thinking they were 'junk mail'.

 

I'm glad that you have arranged to pay the matter off without the highly expensive appeal, which would likely have incurred further substantial costs with no benefit for your wife.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...