Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Parcelforce, how stupid can they be?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3945 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First off, let me explain that I am in Shetland. So other courier services like DHL or FedEx is not an option.

 

I had some documents I need to send to Philippines very urgently for a visa application for a honeymoon. I walked into the local Post Office on Friday, 7 June 2013, and got it sent by Parcelforce Global Express service, which is a "guaranteed" service. I paid £60.60 and was told it will be there on Tuesday, 11 June 2013.

 

Standard Global Express service to Philippines takes 2 days but being in Shetland, it takes an extra day. Saturaday is counted as a working day, so a Tuesday arrival sounds right.

 

So imgaine my horror to get home from work yesterday (Monday, 10 June 2013) to find the package sitting on my door mat! Instead of making its way to Philippines, it went 10 miles the wrong way!

 

So I have to take it back to the Post Office today and was told "this shouldn't happen". The address on it was clearly typed and on the customs form, the "from" and "to" address are both correctly filled in. What do they mean by this shouldn't happen? Clearly it is not the mistake of just one party as it will have to go through sorting before being handed to the postman to carry to my door. I as told by the manager he will make sure it will go correctly this time. However when I just checked (10 hours since handing it to him), the tracking number is still not registred on their system.

 

While I know I can claim back the postage I paid for late delivery (not hopeful as there are many stories of failed claim against Parcelforce on the internet), there is no vaule to the contents and thousands loss if the visa cannot be approved in time.

 

I had emailed them a few times today, but I got no response as well and strangely Parcelforce is not regulated by Ofcom, so I cannot even complain to them.

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tracking numbers on the system and on their site can take 24 hours to update. I would try and keep calm and give it a full 24 hours then demand answers.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a bit hard to keep calm when they send it to the "From" address instead of the "To" address... Considering they sent a "Global" Express item from the UK to the UK. If I wanted that, I would had sent it Special Delivery.

 

And to top it off, I am faced with the posibility of missing my honeymoon...

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Human error. Or at least thats what they'll say it's down to. If you try to get compo out of them, especially if you miss your honeymoon, they can say why did you leave it to the last minute. Coupled with the "human error", they would simply say its a series of unfortunate events, but they'll offer a small token of comp as a gesture of goodwill.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think I can actually claim for lost of the honeymoon because their own terms states:

 

9.5 Parcelforce Worldwide does not accept liability for any loss of contracts, business, profits, revenue, anticipated savings or any indirect or consequential loss or damage whatsoever or howsoever arising whether from contract, breach of statutory duty, tort (including negligence of Parcelforce Worldwide, its officers, employees, contractors and agents), or otherwise.

 

http://www.parcelforce.com/help-information/terms-and-conditions/conditions-carriage#9

 

As for me leaving it to the last minute or not, is not their problem, I used their "guaranteed" service and instead of providing me the service they guaranteed, they cannot even send it in the right direction. In any case, I was given 10 working days on 6 June by the embassy to send the documents to them, therefore it was not me that left it to the last minute since I sent them off on 7 June. By the way, I started the visa application process 3 months ago, hardly last minute. But again, in any case, this is of no concern of Parcelforce, their job is to send what I want sending to the right place in the time they guaranteed.

 

http://www.parcelforce.com/send-worldwide/non-account-services/express/faq

 

The only "guarantee" I can see is they made sure they will not be responsible for any loss suffered due to their only incompetence.

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, they have 5 days to get it to the destination, otherwise you could sue for breach of contract and claim comp that way. Although it would be up to a judge what happens there.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fingers cross that it will actually go in the right direction this time. But as I said in my first post, the tracking number is just showing as "Advised" is really worrying as it was that status since Friday when I first posted it and then finding it on my door mat yesterday.

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tracking numbers on the system and on their site can take 24 hours to update. I would try and keep calm and give it a full 24 hours then demand answers.

 

It is 24 hours now, it is still showing as "Advised". I will not be surprised if it is making its way back to my door mat again.

NatWest for £272:Full and final settlement: 13/11/06

Argos Card for £52.50:Paid to Argos account: 10/11/06

Bank of Scotland for £218:Full and final settlement: 25/01/07

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
It is a bit hard to keep calm when they send it to the "From" address instead of the "To" address... Considering they sent a "Global" Express item from the UK to the UK. If I wanted that, I would had sent it Special Delivery.

 

And to top it off, I am faced with the posibility of missing my honeymoon...

 

 

Sounds familiar?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh! and if there was a delay they will state " must of been the other end who delayed item", but of course as anybody knows that the item into Aquino international, then on to Makati then on to destination and as I found a record on reverse of letter package states date/time event and where.

 

I could tell you other stories of Royal Mail incompetance in the past decades. Hope there is no more problems there.

 

by the way where abouts is the lady from, we have our other home over there?

:mad2::-x:jaw::sad:
Link to post
Share on other sites

If I were you, I would also contact the embassy directly, and tell them that the documents are on the way, but due to postal service timescales it may take more than ten days. Don't spin your story out to them, they don't care!

 

If everything goes wrong, remember that EU contract law overrides ParcelForce's terms and conditions. If they promise to do something and fail (and "human error" is no excuse - it's the problem, not the explanation!) then they are responsible by law for the fallout. Saying "No we're not" does not relieve them of that, it just convinces most people not to try claiming.

 

Remember: IANAL, this is just my opinion...

Link to post
Share on other sites

First off, let me explain that I am in Shetland. So other courier services like DHL or FedEx is not an option.

 

I had some documents I need to send to Philippines very urgently for a visa application for a honeymoon. I walked into the local Post Office on Friday, 7 June 2013, and got it sent by Parcelforce Global Express service, which is a "guaranteed" service. I paid £60.60 and was told it will be there on Tuesday, 11 June 2013.

 

Standard Global Express service to Philippines takes 2 days but being in Shetland, it takes an extra day. Saturaday is counted as a working day, so a Tuesday arrival sounds right.

 

So imgaine my horror to get home from work yesterday (Monday, 10 June 2013) to find the package sitting on my door mat! Instead of making its way to Philippines, it went 10 miles the wrong way!

 

So I have to take it back to the Post Office today and was told "this shouldn't happen". The address on it was clearly typed and on the customs form, the "from" and "to" address are both correctly filled in. What do they mean by this shouldn't happen? Clearly it is not the mistake of just one party as it will have to go through sorting before being handed to the postman to carry to my door. I as told by the manager he will make sure it will go correctly this time. However when I just checked (10 hours since handing it to him), the tracking number is still not registred on their system.

 

While I know I can claim back the postage I paid for late delivery (not hopeful as there are many stories of failed claim against Parcelforce on the internet), there is no vaule to the contents and thousands loss if the visa cannot be approved in time.

 

I had emailed them a few times today, but I got no response as well and strangely Parcelforce is not regulated by Ofcom, so I cannot even complain to them.

 

I have had a similar experience of incompetence from Parcelforce.

 

I sent a Limited Edition BlackBerry via their top Global Express service at a cost of £54 to Russia, with a guaranteed 2-3 day delivery target. It was eventually delivered some 17 days later, and I discovered that they breached their contractual terms to "downgrade" the service used from Global Express to Global Priority. I filed a compensation claim for the delay immediately after delivery, and they rejected the claim on the basis that "any claim needs to be filed within 15 days of posting the consignment"!!

 

A letter before action email sent directly to the Director of Parcelforce and Cc'ing in the CEO of Royal Mail highlighting the clear and unlawful breach of contract, quickly got this overturned an apparently a full refund of the original cost is on its way back to me now. The email format for all key staff at RM is firstname (.) surname (@) royalmail (.) com - this includes Parcelforce key staff as they owned by RM.

 

It simply shouldn't have to be this way though should it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I am an ex pat living in the Philippines. One wonders why you sent your Visa application to here for that when you could have sent it to London (and you do not need Visa for less than a 21 day stay as you would be classed as a tourist and an automatic extension to 59 days costs GBP22). The fees paid in London are a lot cheaper than sending it to the Philippines

 

On top of that using Global Exppress. I have been waiting 15 days for a parcel from the UK with a gaurenteed 6 days delivery, it has been tracked to the dispatch point in the UK and that is it. I understand from Phil Post that Customs are a sticking point

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...