Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fraudulent company registration using my details


bland479
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3942 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The night before last,for no particular reason,I typed my name into Google.

I was perturbed by the fact one of the results returned was on a website named checkSURE.biz,which appeared to list me as a company director,along with my address.

I have contacted checkSURE to find out what is going on.I have never,ever been a director,much less run a business from my flat!

As I understand it,this can be one of the steps in Identity Theft,and fraudsters can basically register anyones name and address to run up business debts or similar nefarious activities.

I have also contacted Companies House to ascertain whether a company has been registered for real.At the moment,I am considering the possibility that checkSURE have simply created a speculative entry,so I'll pay the nine quid for this company report.I'm not completely naive,but nor do I want to get hysterical :)

Following advice gleaned on the web,I've set up an Experien account,but it will take 5 days for the PIN to arrive.

I have not contacted the police.

I wondered if anyone here might have some experience with this particular issue.According to the David Icke forums,a shedload of MPs are seemingly registered as companies by checkSURE,yet there's no entry at Companies House.

Neither checkSURE nor Companies house have replied to my emails as yet.

I apologise for rambling,but this has blindsided me slightly.

Edited to add: I just ran the free web check at companies house using the company number and no such company was found.

Update: I just got an email from checksure saying they will investigate and if what I say is true,they will remove the listing.

Edited by bland479
typo
Link to post
Share on other sites

Quick update: This is the reply I got from Companies House,confirming there's no company.I think the part "or a company with your name has been incorporated as a limited company" should more properly read "nor has a company..."

 

"Thank you for your recent correspondence regarding a company being set up in your name. I have checked the public register and you are not listed on our records or a company with your name has been incorporated as a limited company, therefore it is not a matter for Companies House to look into".

 

So,it really looks as if checksure.biz is buying general personal data from somewhere,listing it with a fictitious company number then offering to sell a report on said Director or Company.Of course,I will check Experian as soon as the PIN arrives and update this further,if only to shed some light for anyone else who runs across a spurious listing on checksure.It really makes me wonder what kind of data they would populate a "report" with,on a random individual.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Had a similar thing where I was supposedly a director of a foreign exchange business that didnt really exist. I think that fraudsters set up ghost companies in the hope that they can con someone elsewhere in the world to pay up for some service and have a few of these in the background just in case. Check with the ICANN listings to see if you "own" a domain name that looks dodgy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the reply.Gosh,it never crossed my mind to check ICANN,will do that.

Eperian didn't bring anything untoward to light,just to update this a little.

ETA: All clear on domaintools.com running several variations of my name.Not 100% conclusive,of course as there is a limit on how many registrar databases are searched.

Edited by bland479
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...