Jump to content


Marlin Court Action on HSBC CC, HSBC already said they hold no CCA - help


ZENTRIX9
 Share

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2403 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I'm really really sorry, you have had a pretty tough time. But the judges decision is based on a legal basis and not on moral issues.

 

The only paperwork that will prevent the charging order will be proof that you do not owe the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Have you now started to reclaim the Payment Protection Insurance ?

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

 

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

 

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

 

 

BCOBS

 

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

 

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

 

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debbie, the only way I had a chance of proving that she didnt owe the money was to go to court and they stopped us doing that. I would have at least like d the chance, the judge wouldnt even let us appeal!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay.

 

If she is not going, get a doctors letter...otherwise regardless of how painful it is, if you have to carry her in, do it. This may be harsh, but the judge will see this as an important issue, and if she does not attend he will not take your defence seriously. Phone the court in the morning and request a wheelchair and ensure access.

 

 

If she admitted liability and agreed to the CCJ and failed to comply with the judgment order, than the Charging order will be automatically granted - We didnt admit liability she was given judgment over the phone (conference call)

 

The 1st phase of a CCJ allows you to acknowledge the claim within a specified time.You are given the option to admit the debt and repay or defend.

 

If you fail to respond to this claim or admit, judgment is granted.

 

If you defend and dispute, it is transferred to your local court.

 

If judgment was granted over the phone than you must have admitted liability. Do you have any proof that you defended the original claim and the correct procedures were not followed. Your going to have to prove the original claim was unenforeceable, and your wife must attend.....if only to ask for a postponement.

 

Her offer of payment I'm afraid was an acknowledgement of owing the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Debbie, the problem is that my wife cannot bend her knee, it has to be kept straight or the skin could split (its that swollen) and if I need a doctors letter I wont get one for tomorrow. If the court can provide a wheelchair that will keep her leg extended we may be able to get there but I very much doubt it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask yourself, what will happen if they get a charging order ?

 

My point is simple. Accept it will happen & don't get upset. Don't get upset or angry with the judge instead concentrate solely on only allowing the charge with restrictions.

 

You have children. The judge will not, absolutely defentinately not put you and your children on the streets.

You have a share in the property.

Your wife, whose debt this is.....don't discuss other joint issues....is ill, and can't work.

You are the sole provider for your family.

 

Let them have there charge on her share of the equity but with the provisions.

 

No Post judgment interest unless they can provide a copy of the agreement with a PJI clause.

No Sale order.

 

Debbie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay, if she is not going. phone the court tomorrow morning, explain and ask for a postponment. They will probably refuse, so turn up alone.

 

If you can, or have a phone, take pictures and show them to the court clerk when you turn up. Insist that she explains this to the judge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The RBS have had a charging order against me for £39,000 since 2008. The restrictions prevent them from applying for a sale notice, and they cannot apply interest.There is nothing more they can do except negotiate a reduced settlement and right off the rest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh by the way, the provision on my charging order doesn't even stiplulate that I have to make monthly payments.

 

The charge is for £39,000.

No interest to be applied.

No application for a sale notice.

No monthly payments.

Link to post
Share on other sites

One thing I would add is that the hearing is to make an ICO final, they judge is not concerned with issues regarding the CCJ and will not go behind the original judgment at the hearing. If you wanted to apply to set aside/appeal this should have been done separately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I still apply for a set aside once the Charging order has gone through?

 

Yes but subject to time and a supporting defence with merit.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi All, I have a credit card debt with HSBC.

 

I stopped paying it a couple of years ago after they couldnt find the CCA agreement.

 

Sent them the in dispute letter and not really heard much from them.

 

I have recently been chased by Marlin (the creditors of the account)

and as I have not agreed a payment plan they have appointed Mortimer Clarke solicitors to take over recovery activity.

 

got a letter from M.C. usual bold red wriyting stating

"ARE YOU AWARE OF THE SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES OF A COURT JUDGMENT BEING MADE AGAINST YOU"

 

Different paragraphs headed in bold stating:-

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS COULD BE BROUGHT AGAINST YOU

 

A COUNTY COURT JUDGMENT HAS SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES

 

YOU COULD AVOID THIS EASILY

 

IF YOU DO NOT CONTACT U,S COURT PROCEEDINGS WILL BE ISSUED

 

DON'T MISS THE CHANCE TO STOP COURT PROCEEDINGS BEING BROUGHT AGAINST YOU

 

I have never admitted the debt with HSBC.

 

Do I reply to them asking for proof of the debt or just ignore them?

 

Bully tactics to get me to pay?

 

Any advice would be gratefully recieved

Link to post
Share on other sites

ignore them

 

just willy waving in case you have gathered any morals of late.

 

is it on your cra file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok so what is the default date in the debts summary?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

so October next year it will vanish

 

your last payment ? was prob up to 6mts before this date too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all, I have a credit card debt with HSBC.

A few years ago I stopped paying due to HSBC not complying to my CCA request, they sent me a blank form with nothing on it so I put it into dispute.

I have 2 letters from seperate people from HSBC stating that they cannot find my CCA.

 

They have now sold my debt to Marlin Europe. I have ignored Marlin and have now received a claim form from Northampton for over £10,000.

 

I have to submit my defense in approx 7 days,

 

anyone have any ideas?

 

I am thinking of sending a copy of the letter from HSBC stating they dont have a copy of my CCA

and seeing if they will strike it out before it goes any further.

 

Am I thinking along the right lines?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Heres the POC

 

By an agreement in writing between HSBC Banl Plc.

 

("HSBC") & the defendant dated 17/07/2002 ("the agreement")

HSBC agreed to issue the Defendant with a credit card upon the terms & conditions set out therein.

 

In breach of the Agreement the Defendant failed to make payments of not less than the minimum payment shown on the monthly statement.

 

HSBC served a Default Notice on the Defendant stating the amount due & requiring the Defendant to pay same.

 

The Defendant failed to pay & the Agreement was terminated.

 

The Agreement was assigned to the Claimant on 15/02/2013.

 

The Claimant has complied with Sections III & IV of Practice Direction - Pre-action Conduct.

 

The Claimant therefore claims:

1. £XXXXXXX

2. Interest pursuant to section 69 of the County Courts Act 1984, namely £XXXXXX & continuing until judgment or sooner payment at the rate of 2.19.

Link to post
Share on other sites

several threads merged for background info

thread tidied and moved to legal forum

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...