Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, reading the guidance online it says to wait for a letter from the court. Should I wait or submit the directions? BTW, I assume that the directions are a longer version of the particular of claim accompanied by evidence, correct?
    • Thanks for opening, it's been another rough year for my family and I've procastinated a little.. Due to the age of my defaults on this and other accounts (circa 2021), I really need to avoid a CCJ as that will be another 6 years of credit issues. Mediation failed as I played the 'not enough info to make a decision' however during the call for some reason they did offer settlement at 80%, I refused. this has been allocated to small claims track, court date is June 3 and I've received their WS. I'm starting on my WS. They do appear to have provided everything required of them (even if docs could be reconstructions). Not really sure what my argument is anymore but I do want to attend court and see this through. Should a judgement be made against me then I will clear the balance within 30 days and have the CCJ removed - this is still possible isn't it? I'm going to be reading up today and tomorrow and hope you can provide me some guidance in the meantime. Wonder what your advice would be given the documents they have provided? I am now in a position to clear the debt either by lump sum or a few large installments - Is this something i should look into at this late stage? Thanks as always in advance
    • I have now received my SAR. It includes a great deal of information! Is there a time limit on how long account information is kept and/or can be provided to debtors? I have received many account statements which were not previously sent to me. I remember that the creditor should provide explanations of any acronyms and abbreviations that maybe used in the documents. Is this still the case? Also what, if any, are the regulations in regard to adding fees to a debt? Can fees be added to a debt after the court has approved a charge on a property. Perhaps due to the numerous owners of the debt, many payments I made were not properly recorded on the account, some were entered over a year after the payment was made! Following the Legal Charge, I paid every month until my payments were refused. I am trying to compute the over payments, but the addition of fees etc. is confusing me. Any comments and/or help would be appreciated.
    • did you submit your directions
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Marlin Court Action on HSBC CC, HSBC already said they hold no CCA - help


ZENTRIX9
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3348 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have now received a reply to my SAR. I have lots of paperwork and I am sure that some things are missing, but havent checked yet. The covering letter says the following :-

In response to your recent letter I enclose personal information that is held about you.

With regards to the credit-card agreement, this cannot be located in our records as it is not held in a structured filing system i.e. in files referenced with your name or account details and is therefore outside the scope of the Data Protection Act 1998. We are satisfied that this procedure meets with the information Commisions requirements.

Please refer to the attached documents for further guidance.

 

Am I right that they are taliking SH*T? and as usual trying to weasle out of what they are required to do by law?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 314
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The following day I received another letter

A FINAL DEMAND

 

We now DEMAND immediate payment of ******* Current interest arrangements will continue to apply.

 

YOU HAVE 14 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS LETTER TO REPAY IN FULL or let us have a satisfactory proposal for repayment by installments or otherwise.

 

ACTION will be taken against you through DEBT COLLECTORS or SOLICTORS if you fail to comply with this demand. You may also be taken to COURT.

 

Further, as a DEFAULTING DEBTOR, details of your default including your name and address will be given to the following CREDIT REFERENCE AGENCIES :-

 

Experian

Equifax

Callcredit

 

If you want to avoid this action and you cannot repay us in full within 14 days from the date of this letter it is IMPERATIVE that you call us on ***** BLAH BLAH BLAH

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I am concerned this account is still in dispute and they have issued a default notice while its in dispute and now a final demand for the full amount, which I think is unlawfull. Am I correct in thinking that I send them the acceptance letter for the unlawfull termination.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No hang fire, the DN looks faulty for a start, sorry but am very busy for the next two weeks, but someone will hopefully give you the same advise ref, unlawful repudiation and set you on the right course...

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I recently sent a SAR request to HSBC and I dont think they sent me everything.

 

I have had a business with them also as well as personal accounts.

 

 

Would I be right in thinking that they should have sent me all the information regarding the business as well.

 

 

I was hoping to see if they held any personal guarantees.

 

 

I also signed up to invoice financing with them after they audited the company.

 

 

6 weeks later I had to put the company into liquidation.

 

 

Can I sue them for not doing their job correctly?

 

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I (imho) would have thought that you are one entity and all personal records can be requested with one SAR but your business would be a separate entity and would require another SAR to obtain information on all its accounts.

 

This would make sense to me but I could be wrong................

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006

 

THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU

;)

 

We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation

 

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Q. What does a SAR get you?

A. From HSBC? A box load of garbage. they selected only recent letters sent (though some proved useful as I hadn't kept copies becuaes handwritten at the time, but HSBC didn't know I didn't have a record of them); and reams of that silly green computer feeder paper with useless info on it. Honestly, they should be tried for murdering a tree to satisfy their SAR requests (which are invariably late

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have called the ICO. They say that they dont have to send me items relating the the Ltd company as its not "Personal data".

If I want this information I need to contact HSBC's business dept to get what I want.

Link to post
Share on other sites

But of course HSBC never bothered to tell you that themselves, did they?

Advice and comments posted by The Debt Star reflect only my personal opinion and it is up to you alone to decide what action you should take. You should always seek independent legal advice from your own qualified legal advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

in my case, it got me copies of letters which HSBC have stated in court (in so many words) were not commercially viable to re-produce when requested under CPR...

 

err oops

HTH (Hope This Helps) RDM2006

 

THE FORCE (OF CAG) IS WITH YOU

;)

 

We've Helped You To Claim - Now Help Us Remain

A live Site - Make a Donation

 

All advice and opinions given by people on this site are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, please seek qualified professional legal Help.

 

However, if you have found any advice you have been given helpful.

Why not show your gratitude And

Click the * on the post you found helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I have a credit card in dispute with HSBC. I have been chasing them to refund me for a refund they underpaid me previously. I got a letter from them that my calculations were wrong it should be X amount and they have refunded my credit card account to bring the balance down. Can they do that? I thought that they had to offer a choice of how to pay me back. If someone can give me some advice on this as I also have a PPI claim going through and I dont want the same thing to happen. I will post up the letters so you can see what has gone on. Slimey HSBC BANK!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought that only applied to a credit card account that was unlawfully terminated? When they originally refunded me last year when I had not put the account into dispute they gave me 2 or 3 options of how I could be paid back. Cheque, bank account or credi the card account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a couple of accounts which will be terminated very shortly. Both had defaults issued while the accounts were in dispute for non compliance to my CCA request.

If they were issued while the account was in dispute would that make the default notice invalid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a couple of accounts which will be terminated very shortly. Both had defaults issued while the accounts were in dispute for non compliance to my CCA request.

If they were issued while the account was in dispute would that make the default notice invalid?

 

If the only reason that they were "in dispute" was for non compliance with the CCA request then yes they can issue a default notice, in fact they can do everything except obtain a court judgement.

 

Its all thanks to Carey vs HSBC and McGuffick vs rbs

 

See http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/consultations/OFT1175con.pdf

 

S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I dont know what to do next.

One is from MBNA and the other from Santander.

 

I will upload scans and other details tomorrow for both and paste the links on this thread.

 

Should I acnowledge service online for now?

 

Any help will be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Legal Issues Forum.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok heres the history with Santander

I made an online application on 29/01/2008 (Think it was online)

 

Got a statement on 6/7/10 £80 ish overdue

Reminder on 7/7/10

Sent a CCA request 20/7/10

http://s911.photobucket.com/albums/ac318/zentrix9/MR%20SANTANDER/

Link to CCA reply and what I got above

CCA reply letter dated 22/7/10

Default notice received dated 21/7/10 Raised the day before they sent me the CCA reply! Doesnt look like its set out in the prescribed form to me. No specific date to remedy.

Letter stating they cant hold my account 28/7/10

Letter threatening DCA, Legal action etc 7/8/10

Account in dispute letter sent 18/8/10

Letter acknowledging dispute letter 26/8/10

Letter not accepting dispute letter 8/9/10

Letter removing my phone number after I complained about all the repeated calls (at least 2 per day) 16/9/10

Letter from Viking saying that the account has been transfered to them and want payment in full 17/9/10

Letter from Viking asking for me to call them and pay the overdue amount 23/9/10

Statement 6/10/10

Letter from Viking pay full balance 6/10/10

Letter from Viking pay full balance or they will close account and return it to Santander 26/10/10

Letter from Viking pay overdue amount 28/10/10

Letter from Viking pay full balance 19/11/10

Letter from Viking pay full balance 8/12/10

Statement 30/12/10

Letter from Lewis Debt recovery acting on behalf of their client and to pay Lewis the full balance 14/1/11

Letter from Howard Cohen stating they are starting court action 4/2/11

Court papers received dated 21/2/11

Letter from Howard Cohen confirming that I should have received court papers 23/2/11

I have acknowledged service online today 27/2/11

 

As I see it they have sent me paperwork from my CCA request that falls short of what I have asked for. They have sent me a copy of my CCA with terms and conditions but the APR rate has changed since so I think I should have had a copy for each time it has been changed. Also at the bottom of the form it states that it is signed for and on behalf of GE Capital Bank Ltd, so wouldnt my contract be with them and not Santander? To my knowledge I have not signed anpther contract or been issued with a new card since I signed. The default notice they have sent me is not set out in the prescribed form.

They have sent me letters from DCA's and solicitors asking me to pay but without clarification that they have a legal right or are the legal owners of the debt now.

Tomorrow I will send Santander the unlawful repudiation letter, and start my defence based on the above.

 

Any help or comments would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Another thing I just noticed looking at the default notice. The letter is dated 21/07/10. It states :-

 

To remedy the breach you must pay the arrears within 14 days from receipt of this notice. ( To be valid it must be date specific, within 14 days of receipt is not in the prescribed form)

 

IF THE ACTION REQUIRED BY THIS NOTICE IS TAKEN BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN NO FURTHER ACTION WILL BE TAKEN IN RESPECT OF THE BREACH.

 

IF YOU DO NOT TAKE THE ACTION BEFORE THE DATE SHOWN THEN THE FURTHER ACTION SET OUT BELOW MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU. (The only date shown on the letter is 21/07/10, I received the letter 2 or 3 days after so there isnt a hope in hell of me taking action before the date. This should make it invalid)

Now they have demanded payment in full on the back of a faulty DN I will accept and they can only chase the arrears.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...