Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Paying csa when child is working


luckybird00
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3833 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am paying CSA around £430 a month out of my wages to my son from a previous relationship.

He is now 17 and I dont have any contact with him.

He has displayed on social networking sites that he is working and flashing his cash.

Friends of mine who speak and know him have also told me this information.

I have reported it to the CSA and have been told that because his Mum is claiming child benefit I still have to pay.

Any ideas on what to do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

CSA are correct - your liability order will apply until the age of 16 unless the child is still in education (full time non advanced) if the child is working and is not in education then you're not liable for payments anymore. P.s - 12 hours education is the minimum requirement to be classed as full time education

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is working painting and decorating,she is obviously giving the child benefit wrong information as he is definatly working and not in any form of education

any advise on what i can do?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ring the CSA and let them know your son is working and not in education anymore, maybe he's on some sort of training programme to do with college? CHB are usually on the ball with school leavers x

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

All you can do is report it to the CSA and hope they can do something about it. I appreciate it seems massively unfair but if you stop paying then you will get into arrears and the CSA will chase you for them. Plus the impression I get from your posts is that you think he has left education but you don't know for sure

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CSA money is deducted from my wages.

He is putting on facebook that he has worked a 72 hour week and friends of mine know he is definatly working.

Im annoyed as I have another child who is now one and we could do with that money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To play devils advocate here bearing in mind I don't know your son at all, just because he says he's worked a 72 hour week doesn't mean he actually has. Until you get some definite proof (and I'm not sure a Facebook status counts) or your ex wife stops receiving child benefit then you will continue to pay CSA for him

Link to post
Share on other sites

This has been going on since may last year, i informed the csa and benefit people who have told me their looking into it.

i have called back and they have told me that it hasnt been reported.

i think i am going to send a letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We had exactly the same problem, with my husbands eldest son, it is very unfair so say the least! We rang for weeks and got exactly no where, mean while we still had to keep paying! In the end we were told to write to the CSA, to complain and say if it wasn't sorted our next step would be a complaint to the Independent complaints case examiner. Have to say that with-in a week, it was all sorted!!! The ex wife then had to start paying back the money she had been over paid. We will be having the exact same problem again shortly when the next one. Be glad when its finished! Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He is working painting and decorating,she is obviously giving the child benefit wrong information as he is definatly working and not in any form of education

any advise on what i can do?

 

My son does a painting and decorating course which is considered full time education, but he also gets paid for some work he does for his work placement outside the allotted hours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

You can ask the CSA to request a review of circumstances with regards to eligibility. I was lucky when a similar thing happened to me and the advisor explained this was an option. It can take up to month to complete (mine took around 2 weeks) as they have to request a check on CHB eligibility which may in itself cause CHB to investigate such eligibility if sufficient cause or suspicion is evident.

 

I did this over the phone to CSA but you can also request this in writing and perhaps include copies of any such social network postings as supporting examples causing the concern although these are obviously easily faked and may be ignored.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also,I have a 16 month old baby which I havent told csa about,would this lower the payments if i did so.

would this implicate the 16 months old mum as we dont live together but we both financially support the child. I do not give her money for his keeping but contribute to buying him the things he needs

Link to post
Share on other sites

The basic rule of thumb for the CSA when calculating payments is: 15% Net Pay for 1 child, 20% for 2 children and 25% for 3 or more. This is for children whom you pay maintenance for via the CSA. Any monies received should be split equally between the children and paid to the parent(s) with care although this ratio can change depending on the children's ages. It would be common sense (sadly not a quality often demonstrated by some of the CSA 'advisers') that the total amount of maintenance you should be expected to pay for 2 children is 20%, even though one of them is being supported directly, thus you could argue that you should only be expected to pay 10% for the child you are supporting through CSA. They may ask to see evidence that you're supporting your baby but a letter from the mum would usually be sufficient, preferably with a note that she does not require the 'services' provided by CSA to collect any maintenance you have both reached a mutual agreement regarding this. Such a comment would ensure the CSA does not become involved in maintenance for your second child and does not discount the possibility that either of you may want their involvement in the future.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, is it possible that your son is doing some sort of Apprentiship/NVQ? Child support is payable as long as Child Benefit is claimed, and the only circumstances that can happen at 17 is if he is in full time education or approved training. Also, even if his training finishes, his mum may be allowed to claim CB for up to 20 weeks afterwards. I promise you they do check with the Child Benefit Office ( I know this because my son did some part time work too and his dad got cross about paying CSA, except my child is just 16 and it was only 6 hours cleaning). The Child benefit office have lots of ways of checking that a parent is rightfully in receipt of benefit so i would ring them and ask them to look at this for you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...