Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Breaking News Biden wins Kennedy family endorsement Fifteen members of the storied Kennedy political family endorsed U.S. President Joe Biden at a Philadelphia campaign event on Thursday, with some joining him onstage, in a rebuke of Robert F. Kennedy Jr's independent bid for the White House. and 30 members in the extended Kennedy family   nytimes.com WWW.NYTIMES.COM Kennedys endorse Biden over their relative RFK Jr WWW.BBC.CO.UK Robert F Kennedy Jr is running for president as an independent - but many family members oppose him. More than a dozen Kennedy family members endorse Biden, snub RFK Jr. | CBC News WWW.CBC.CA President Joe Biden accepted endorsements from at least 15 members of the Kennedy political family during a campaign stop...  
    • Speaking of Frost and Johnson the corrupt liars' grate deal they forced through   Shortages of life saving medicines has become ‘new normal’ for UK after Brexit WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK ‘The medicines supply chain is broken at every level,’ warns Dr Leyla Hannbeck   "Professor Tamara Hervey, of the City Law School, said: “There is nothing inevitable about this ‘new normal’ where Great Britain is isolated in efforts to manage fragilities in global supply of the products and people we need to run the NHS. It is the consequence of policy choices and those could be different.”     Mind you, the private sector is making hays while the NHS is burned. Private health insurance market grows by £385m in a year amid NHS crisis | Private healthcare | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Demand for private treatment booms as NHS waiting lists remain long, while more people also sign up for dental cover  
    • That's an idea on Maquarie. On being accountable, you also have to blame Ofwat and possibly the Environment Agency although they've been badly defunded. I put the Frost article up for balance.  
    • I agree HB, but there were no laws broken - its perfectly legal to fleece the UK and its infrastructure - and labour were little better than the Tories Perhaps an option would be to ban the aussie investment fund from the UKs markets
    • surprised you gave that frost article the light of day HB Long been the case that no further evidence of his wing-nutishness needed. Heck he even railed against the rubbish grate deal he largely created
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell - Getting On My Nerves - shopacheck debt


roxy2010
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Posted on here a few weeks ago about a debt I had with Shopacheck that had been passed on to Lowells.

 

I disputed it as Shopacheck said i only owed £160 but Lowells said I Owed over £500.

 

I asked Lowells to send me the CCA and told them of the timescale.

 

They told me that they didnt have to comply with the timescale and that they would send me the CCA's as soon as they could.

 

I have now recieved a letter with three CCA's

 

these are not the originals as they dont have my signature on them.

 

Is this acceptable or should they be the originals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as the CCA is a version of the one you would have taken out, including all the relevant information that applied, they have probably complied with your CCA request.

 

Do you know when you last made a payment ?

 

When did you take out the account with Shopacheck and how did you apply for it ?

 

I would suggest that you write asking for a full breakdown of the calculation for the £500 Lowell have stated in their letter. My experience with a relatives debts, is that Lowells and other DCA's appear to make mistakes within the debt balances they show on correspondence. Send by recorded delivery and keep a copy of the letter.

 

The letter just needs to be simple

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to Lowell.

 

I refer to your letter dated xx/xx/xxxx regarding Shopacheck reference xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.

 

Please provide a full breakdown calculation of the sum of £500 shown in your letter. Please include original statements of account from Shopacheck, as requested previously, which you have failed to provide.

 

I look forward to receiving this information, so that I may investigate this matter further.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that if you are disputing the balance it would be wise to send a Subject Access Request

as apposed to CCA request as the information provided will identify how the balance claimed was calculated.

 

The consumer credit agreement will only show the amount borrowed, the term of the agreement and the level of interest.

 

On the down side there is a fee of £10.00 for this information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted on here a few weeks ago about a debt I had with Shopacheck that had been passed on to Lowells. I disputed it as Shopacheck said i only owed £160 but Lowells said I Owed over £500. I asked Lowells to send me the CCA and told them of the timescale.

They told me that they didnt have to comply with the timescale and that they would send me the CCA's as soon as they could. I have now recieved a letter with three CCA's these are not the originals as they dont have my signature on them. Is this acceptable or should they be the originals.

 

Three separate CCAs or one document in 3 parts?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please tell how can they justify a debt with no proof of it to show in a court of law

 

You have to be careful in making allegations that you cannot back up. In the event of any court action,

the defendant would have the right to probe the amount of debt.

 

Even before any court action, anybody receiving a letter from a DCA has the right to query the information

contained and to ask for a breakdown calculation.

 

Perhaps in this case Lowell have just put in the interest rate applicable to the debt,

with the relevant dates and a sum has been calculated,

which they have put in their letter.

 

It is up to Lowell to justify this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

shopacheck/welcome finance doorstepper account...

 

when did you take this out

 

I think from the old thread it was well prior 2007?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please tell how can they justify a debt with no proof of it to show in a court of law

Where is it stated that there is no proof of the debt?

 

But I give you some pointers as to what can and does happen.

 

Case Law has resulted in the creditor/debt purchaser being able to produce a 'reconstituted' agreement that complies with a sections 77/78 request made under CCA 1974, such an agreement together with evidence of the customers use of a credit facility can lead to a judge deciding that on the balance of probabilities that an agreement an liability exists.

 

Read through the threads.

 

BTW the comments you have made really are of no help to the OPs.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All

 

Thanks for the replys.

 

They have sent me three seperate reconstituted agreements.

 

If these are legal then i will have to arrange a payment plan with them.

 

I was just questioning whether they were legal as they didnt have my signature

and also Shopacheck sent me a letter stating i only owed £160.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear All

 

Thanks for the replys. They have sent me three seperate reconstituted agreements. If these are legal then i will have to arrange a payment plan with them. I was just questioning whether they were legal as they didnt have my signature and also Shopacheck sent me a letter stating i only owed £160.

Recons don't have to have signatures BUT must have:

 

Your name and address at the inception of the account

The name and address of the creditor at inception.

ALL the terms and conditions at inception and any other documents mentioned in the those Ts & Cs.

The Ts & Cs at closure of the account

Any amendments made during the life of the agreement.

 

Did you actually have 3 accounts?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I take there is no sign of this debt on your CRA file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Roxy,

# Then these 3 separate documents are meaningless imo, how are you supposed to know which one may be a copy of the original?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought that if you are disputing the balance it would be wise to send a Subject Access Request as apposed to CCA request as the information provided will identify how the balance claimed was calcualted. The consumer credit agreement will only show the amount borrowed, the term of the agreement and the level of interest.

 

On the down side there is a fee of £10.00 for this information.

 

You should also get a full statement of account under a CCA request, wouldn't that supply all the info needed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

A CCA request provides a statement of the account at the time the request is made, historical accounts are provided with a SAR.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...