Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3977 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

Its been a while since my last post.

 

I need some advice about a bailiff that has just called upon my daughter.

 

She is in a security block of flats that cannot be accessed directly without being let in by owner through telecom system.

 

he told her he was from Bristow and Sutor and needed her to make an agreement.

 

She said she was a single woman alone and was not prepared to let him in and would phone the office.

 

He said she needed to let him in and do it now.

 

She said if he didn't go away she would telephone the Police,

he said if she didn't let him in the Police were going to arrest her and 6.30 am tomorrow morning.

 

He has just gone but has left a letter for her.

 

Is this kind of treatment legal and what should she do? thanks x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Total Hogwash from the bailiff, she does not have to let him in, if she feels threatened then police it is!

There is no reason for her arrest, what is the bailiff chasing please?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

She has a violent ex partner and a panic alarm and is constant contact with police, so this is not helping her anxiety. He said if she had a car, he would of taken it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless this has been a very long running affair arrest is not on the cards unless the LA decides to proceed against your daughter for avoiding payment of the CT, difference between can't pay and WONT pay.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

£2367 :( she said she doesn't know how it is so high. She cleared her CT 2 years ago and has been on and off housing benefit since then.

She said she is going to ask for a breakdown of charges, is that a good idea?

Link to post
Share on other sites

That no surprise with BS.

I going to alert the site team to see if the CT experts can help.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have a commercial business providing assistance to debtors faced with a bailiff visit and just today, I have received 3 similar enquiries as yours where a bailiff threatened that unless they are allowed entry that a warrant will be issued for their arrest. It is becoming a very worrying time indeed. Let me explain WHY the bailiff wants to gain entry.

 

A bailiff company may only charge a fee of £24.50 for "attending to levy" and a further 2nd visit can be made and the fee for this 2nd visit is charged at £18.00. UNLESS the bailiff is able to gain "peaceful entry" into the premises or alternatively; to "levy" upon a car outside, the MAXIMUM that he can charge is CAPPED at £42.50. These fees will be retained by the bailiff company.

 

The "individual bailiff" would only be able to derive any commission be being able to gain "peaceful entry" into the property and "levying upon goods".

 

The "levy fee" is calculated as a percentage of the amount of the Liability Order but, as a rough guide, if the LO was for £600 the "levy fee" would be £55. On top of this fee the bailiff can then charge a fee of £12 for the Walking Possession. Just on this example alone, you will see that by allowing "peaceful entry" the bailiff would have managed to gain fees of £67.

 

Sadly, it is not until the bailiff has managed to gain "peaceful entry" into the property and levied upon goods that he will outline the basis of a payment plan and many times, the payment arrangement set by the bailiff will be at a figure that is simply unaffordable and what then happens is this:

 

The debtor will very likely make payment (with difficulty) of the amount required by the bailiff at the time of signing the Walking Possession but the 2nd payment will be late. Unbeknown to the debtor the bailiff companies computer system will register the account as being in "default" if payment has not been received in cleared funds into the account by the precise day or the month set by the bailiff.

 

Once the account is shown as "defaulting" the bailiff company will then move the account to a "van bailiff" who will then attend the premises with the "intention of removing the goods previously levied". Crucially, the bailiff will then be legally allowed to charge an "attending to remove" fee to the account. The precise amount of the "van fee" will vary from company to company but as a rough estimate will be between £120 and £250 !!

 

As stated above, the bailiff is only able to gain "peaceful entry" and of course, a debtor can refuse to allow the bailiff entry into her home but she should NOT refuse to pay the debt. It is for this very reason that it is important for any debtor to ensure that they WRITE to the bailiff company to outline their circumstances and to make a sensible payment proposal.

 

The problem that we now have is that people are not writing letters and instead, rely upon calling a bailiff or his company on a mobile phone. Complete madness!!

 

In your daughters case, given the way that the bailiff appears to have already seriously misled her I would not be minded to allow him into the home in any event.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for all that information Tom, what would happen if she contacted the local council in regards to making atrrangement to pay the debt through them? As the figure they are asking is 3 times as much as believed to be owed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bare in mind each time she moves property it will have a different reference number so maybe only one bill will show when typing the one reference in on the computer

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the bailiff cannot gain peaceful entry or gain a levy, as has already been stated they will be entitled to just £42.50 in total for First and Second visit fees

 

as to his claim "he said if she didn't let him in the Police were going to arrest her and 6.30 am tomorrow morning. " a Formal Complaint to the head of Revenues CEO Elected Leader , local member and MP as to the agent of the council Busted & Stupor making false claims as to their powers, and seeking to terrorise a single woman.

Edited by ploddertom
Typo

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to speak to someone at the Council and ask the following questions:

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks to everyone for looking in on this.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send the following for a breakdown of the fees. Send initially by email - tonight - followed by a copy in the post - tomorrow. enquiries(at)bristowsutor.co.uk

 

"From:

My Name

My Address

 

To:

Acme Bailiff Co

Bailiff House

 

Ref: Account No: 123456

 

Dear Sir

 

With reference to the above account, Can you please provide me with a breakdown of the charges.

 

This includes:

a - the time & date of any Bailiff action that incurred a Fee.

b - the reason for the fee.

c - the name(s) of the Bailiff(s) that attended on each occasion a Fee was charged.

d - the name(s) of the Court(s) the Bailiff(s) was/were Certificated at.

e - the date of the Certification.

 

This is not a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act S7 1998 so does not incur a fee of £10. You are obliged to provide this information.

 

I require this information within 14 days.

 

Yours faithfully

 

Ripped off customer"

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If your daughter is under 'protection' from a violent partner she is classed a being vulnerable, it would be advisable for her to also pass this info on to the council and request they take the debt back in house. Your daughter will need to follow previous advice and send an I & E along with her proposal to payments.

 

It is not long ago I helped another young lady in exactly the same position as your daughter with regard to there being a violent partner on the scene, the council in question were very sensitive to the situation as the police themselves supported her with their concerns for her safety, she also involved her local Councillor and her MP...the debt was returned to the Council within 24 hrs and an affordable payment plan put in place :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

WD

 

Good point. The council need to know the circumstances and once again this is why it is so very important that people WRITE A LETTER to the bailiff and if necessary ( in particular in cases such as this) a copy should also be sent to the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

good advice from WD, I feel that these circumstances, where there is a protection issue, and risk from a violent partner, who may well be jointly responsible for a council tax debt, the abused partner should be automatically treated as vulnerable. If the council do not withdraw the bailiffs then a Formal Complaint is in order,

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...