Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Moved to the Private Parking forum.
    • Good afternoon, I am writing because I am very frustrated. I received a parking fine from MET Parking Services Ltd , ( Southgate park Stansted CM24 1PY) . We stopped for a quick meal in Mcdonalds and were there fir around 30 mins. We always do this after flights and never received a parking fine before.  Reason: The vehicle left in Southgate car park without payment made for parking and the occupants southgate premises. they took some pictures of us leaving the car. i did not try and appeal it yet as I came across many forums that this is a scam and I should leave it. But I keep getting threatening letters.  Incident happened : 23/10/2023 I did contact Mcdonalds and they said this:  Joylyn (McDonald’s Customer Services) 5 Apr 2024, 12:05 BST Dear Laura, Thank you for contacting McDonald’s Customer Services. I’m sorry to hear that you have received a Parking Charge Notice following your visit to our Stansted restaurant.   We've introduced parking restrictions at some of our restaurants to make sure there are always parking spaces available for customers.   We appreciate that some visits such as birthday parties or large group visits might take longer and the parking restrictions aren't intended to stop this. If you think your stay will exceed the stated maximum parking time then please speak to a manager in advance.   Your number plate is scanned by our Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) system when you enter our car park, and then again when you leave. If you have overstayed the maximum time allowed, you will not be notified straight away- a Parking Charge Notice will be sent to you via the post.   If you feel that a Parking Charge Notice has been issued in error, please contact our approved contractors who issued the charge in order to appeal the charge. Unfortunately McDonald's are unable to revoke parking tickets- the outcome of the appeal is final and cannot be overturned by McDonald’s.   Many thanks for taking the time to contact McDonald’s Customer Services.   Can someone please help me out and suggest what I should do next?  Thank you 
    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Apple and Replaced iPhone - that went wrong too **REsolved At Store**?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3979 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

 

My sister has an iPhone 4S which was Replaced by Apple within the warranty period (Albeit only just). She was told that it would have 90 days warranty on the replacement handset and was sent on her way very happy indeed.

 

exactly 110 days later the replaced iPhone 4S completely died. Won't turn on, no output from the screen so back to the Apple Store to see what could be done.

 

As the iPhone was 20 days out of warranty, they wanted £129 out of a 16 year old girl to replace the handset. Pretty poor show if you ask me, but their rules were rules!

 

I am aware of the Sale of Goods Act as I am Self Employed and I am curious on the best way to proceed?

 

The original iPhone was replaced whilst it was still in warranty.

 

The replacement died 20 days after that period had ended.

 

Would this be grounds for "Unreasonable period of operational life for the product"

It died less than 4 months in service.

 

I am not paying £129 as the handset is insurance covered, but with an Excess I'd rather not go down that road either.

 

Could anyone suggest the best way to proceed please? Do you personally think that they are in breach of the Sale of Goods Act?

 

For the benefit of doubt. Handset was NOT: Jailbroken, Taken Apart, Dropped, Water Damaged and was always in a case which covered the screen also!

 

Thanks Caggers :)

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Link to post
Share on other sites

simple SOGA case

 

NOTHING to do with ANY warranty.

 

they supplied it.

they are responsible under fitness rules to replace it.

 

end of!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

So what do you suggest? Letter to the store or back to the store tomorrow (They're open Bank Holiday) and quote the SOGA to the Shop Assista... oh sorry... Genius :madgrin:

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Link to post
Share on other sites

there have been instances whereby an email or letter to the office of the Uk's ceo has gotten immediate

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No wonder apple are the richest company on earth when they flout basic laws like this.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just sent off an e-mail to the CEO as suggested dx100uk.

 

Had an immediate response which was an out of office notification. Detailing urgent queries should be forwarded to the CEO' PA. So I forwarded the e-mail across to them... Now we play the waiting game. I'm not expecting them to work on Monday, so I have given them 8 days to response ;)

 

Here is the e-mail I sent, Feel free to put it in the Template Library if you wish :madgrin:

 

Dear Sir,

 

I write to you today regarding my 16 year old sisters recent dealings with your colleagues in the Apple UK Retail Store in X, United Kingdom.

 

I provide my sister with an iPhone which is on Contract of which I am the account holder. She had her iPhone 4S replaced towards the end of the warranty period. She was further informed that she would have 90 days warranty on the new handset.

 

After 110 Days of operation, the replacement handset failed. She promptly took the iPhone to the Apple Retail Store in X of which is approximately X miles from her home address. It is also her closest store.

 

Upon arrival she was informed that the phone would not be replaced as it was out of warranty period by 20 days. She was quoted £129 for a replacement which was immediately declined and she left the store rather upset and disappointed.

 

She informed me of this matter to ask what I could do, hence this e-mail to you, As I am extremely disappointed that you appear to plainly be in breach of The Sale of Goods Act 1979. This act is a fundamentally basic retail law in the United Kingdom; of which your organisation have so callously shown blatant disregard.

 

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 makes it an implied term of the contract that goods be as described, of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose. As you are in breach of contract I am entitled to have my sisters iPhone 4S repaired or replaced and I would request that you confirm that you will do this within the next eight days.

 

I also require you to confirm whether you will arrange for the iPhone 4S to be collected or will reimburse me for the cost of returning it. In the latter case, this will be cost of a Standard Class Return Rail Fare of £x.xx + £25.00 for my time to travel to the Apple Retail Store during UK Business Hours.

 

I look forward to receiving your satisfactory proposals for settlement of my claim within eight days of the date of this e-mail.

 

Yours Sincerely,

 

Disgruntled Apple Customer

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to follow this up really.

 

Had a 45 minute phone call today with Apple Technical Support where I was referred to 2 senior managers and after battering them verbally on the phone for 45 minutes, managed to get them to agree to a free replacement. I was told on the phone it was a one time gesture of good will (Yeah... Right...) and that normally they wouldn't issue such a replacement.

 

They seemed to be very sure of their 'Warranty" despite that it is more than questionable under SOGA.

 

Anyway, I won't mark this a settled matter, I am to go back to the store to exchange handsets. So until then I'll see what happens :)

 

Thanks Caggers :D

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask them to put that in writing, so you can get trading standards comments. ;)

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to finalise this. Sister went to the Apple Store. I was unable to make it personally. Replacement was given and she went away very happy indeed. The manager at the store gave me a call to apologise for the whole siuation and asked if there was anything further he could do.

 

I guess showing your teeth in preparation to bite does work every now and again!

This is how I spend most of my life :ranger:

Link to post
Share on other sites

great result!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...