Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

IDEM Servicing MBNA debt - being total idiots


PGH7447
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3880 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

usual story,

 

MBNA debt sold to these clowns, who assumed that our agreement with MBNA to pay £24 a month meant that they would get the same,

not a cat in hells chance,

 

came into some money

offered a F&F but they wanted an I&E (fat Chance),

 

we offered £10 a month,

 

they still insist that they cant accept any offer without an I&E,

 

we set up a standing order anyway and have been paying that,

 

They have now come back and Threatened to pass this on to a debt collector (arden)

 

This is like a red rag to a bull

 

raised an official complaint about the fool who has been "Dealing" with us.

 

they also threatened to default the account,

 

but I am 99% sure that MBNA have already done that which I have informed these fools of.

 

Now I am not at a total loss as how to deal with these idiots but,

quite frankly they are really getting on my nerves. so any advice / thoughts would be nice to receive.

 

another thing I have now cancelled the standing order so they can take a running jump,

until someone with a bit more common sense that the fool I have had the misfortune to deal with is replaced.

 

rant over

Link to post
Share on other sites

who owns the debt on your cra file?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had dealings with these people too. I found that sternly worded letters, telling them exactly what I would be prepared to do quietened them down. They know their demands are pretty much unenforceable.

Even received an apology and £50 compensation from them for harassment.

 

IDEM Credit Servicing are a DCA, Arden are simply one of their collection teams. You're completely right about the I&E - when I was asked for one, I simply refused and pointed out in writing that only a judge can order me to provide one.

 

Best of luck with them!

 

H. x

Edited by citizenB

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Halibut, tried this but the joker who is dealing with this debt is a right pillock, who can only spout the same drivel in every letter, so I have made an official complaint against them and told idem I will not deal with them until they put someone with a bit of common sense in charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would write to him and say thank-you for bring this to my attention I have reassessed my income and expenditure and now find that I am only able to pay you £5 a month then just keep paying that and ignore any letters unless they go to court.

 

dpick

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

what a DN?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

is the DN compliant?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep, not got an issue with it, not got an issue paying this back, just don't like their attitude and their demands for an I&E so told em to go f*ck themselves and they will get £10 a month, which they have been getting for the past 6 months

Link to post
Share on other sites

had the same problem with Tesco this time, have been paying them for four years have managed to raise it from £1.00 to £5.00 over that time, this time they kept saying I need to fill in there IE, BOY they did not give up, kept saying they would take me to court so in the end done me simple one £ income £ outgoings money left over this is what your getting. There IE form is so personal, with questions like why did you get into debt, partners income if your sick send in sick note ( bunch of jokers ) so my three line IE is all there getting. Will see what they say.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Happyhippy1959

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is more of a leaning toward at some point an I+e or common financial statement should have been done

by the time it gets to court

and some judges are rather annoyed its not been done by the debtor when/if it gets to them

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you seen idems I&E,

 

its a joke - how much do you spend on chocolate etc,

 

they seem to think because I had an agreement with MBNA for £24 a month that that applied to them

 

I came into some money and offered a full and final which is when they went overboard with the whole I&E thing,

 

told them to show me the legislation they were relying on that allowed them to demand this info,

but of course they could not so told them to take a hike,

and would carry on the £24 a month,

but they then said that they still needed the I&E

 

told them that I had filled it out and realised that I could only afford £10 a month,

so thanks for making me fil it in,

but you still aint getting the info

Link to post
Share on other sites

ever looked at PPI/penalties

 

wonder why MBNA sold it?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...