Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

CCA received from TBI


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3944 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My girlfriend has just received a CCA from TBI.

 

Credit card appears to have been an Amazon card from Halifax.

 

The CCA has no signature from Halifax and doesn't appear to have any credit limit written anywhere.

 

I've attached the first 2 pages of the CCA. It would be great if anyone has a chance to look over it to see if it appears to be enforceable/legitimate.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]43938[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]43939[/ATTACH]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use this method by dx100uk

 

set your default scan page size to A4 less than 300DPI [150 will do]

scan the required letters/agreements/sheets - as a picture[jpg] file

don't forget you can use a mobile phone or a digital camera too!!

'

BUT......

ENSURE: remove all pers info inc. barcodes etc using paint program

but leave all monetary figures and dates.

************************* ************************* *******

{DO NOT USE A BIRO OR PEN OR USE SEE THRU TAPE OR LABELS]

try http://www.pdfescape.com TO BLANK STUFF,

************************* ************************* ***********

or

DO IT IN MSPAINT.EXE or any photo editing program

goto one of the many free online pdf converter websites ...

http://freejpgtopdf.com/

..

if you have multiple scans/pics

put them in a word doc FIRST and convert that to PDF

or use http://www.pdfmerge.com

 

convert existing PC files to PDF [office has an installable print to PDF option]

..

 

it would be better to upload a multipage pdf if

you have many images too rather than many single pdfs

.

or if you have PDF as an installed printer drive use that

or use word and save as pdf

try and logically name your file so people know what it is.

though dont use full bank names or CAG in the title

i'e Default notice dd-mm-yyyy TSB

.

open a new msg box here

hit go advanced below the msg box

hit manage attachments below that box

hit the add files button on the top right

hit select files, navigate to your file on your pc

hit upload files

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

does this debt show on her cra file

 

NEVER trust anything TBI say or send you.

 

esp NEVER EVER converse on the phone.

 

have they brought this debt?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've never been able to check her credit files as they wanted answers to security questions she didn't know the answers to!

 

First we knew of it was a letter from SRJ Debt Recoveries on 28/07/11. I sent them a prove it letter and that seemed to be the end of it.

 

We had a letter from IND Limited on 28/09/12 saying they had assigned the debt to TBI. TBI then started writing so I sent them a prove it letter. They've now responded with the CCA and one page of statement. According to TBI the last payment was made on 28/01/09.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if she has an active card of any description

then registration should be easy...on any cra provider

 

I take it she is obv aware of this account?

but just stopped paying?

 

we need more info please

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

She is Lithuanian and didn't speak English until recently.

 

At the time the card was taken out she was living with a borderline criminal/thoroughly unpleasant English man who basically looked after all her finances.

 

It appears that he took the card out in her name and got her to sign for it.

 

She has no recollection of this card and has never posessed the card, however it is her signature on the CCA!

 

Looking at the one page of statement we've been sent there are clearly a number of purchases that certainly haven't been made by her.

 

When she left her partner it appears that he rinsed the card and then stopped paying it.

 

The first we knew of it was as stated above.

Link to post
Share on other sites

aha

 

yes it now becomes clearer.

 

iMHO Halifax fraud might be your best port of call.

 

sjr/tbi/ind are just speculative fleecers

 

however be aware that 'route' typically leads to the CCJ's being issued to previous addresses

 

I, in this case, would not sit on it.

 

s its 2009

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm concerned that going to Halifax fraud we are going to have to admit the signature is hers and so resetting the 6 years to Statute Barred. There is currently over 4 years gone of the 6 years as last payment was Jan.09

 

In an ideal world we would be able to prove her ex boyfriend had committed fraud etc, but in reality I can see it being her word against his and a whole load of grief trying to prove anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would think it would be very very easy for Halifax to prove the story.

 

they'll have all the info and data to hand.

 

you need to also be aware that they will prob be able to match this with 'more'

of his same handy work in the past or since then.

 

I cant see this harming her only do good.

 

you also don't know of any other stuff hes done in her name too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK, this has now moved forward somewhat.

 

Despite advice to the contrary I haven't taken this up with Halifax fraud department.

 

Primarily because I think this will result in my girlfriend having to admit liability to a portion of the debt.

 

I'm still sort of hoping I might be able to drag this out to being statute barred.

 

I have managed to get hold of her credit report from Experian. The report doesn't have any reference at all to this debt. All she has are 3 good credit accounts and a score of 994.

 

She's now received a default notice from TBI threatening county court proceedings if the debt isn't paid by 15/07/13.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it acceptable for a default notice to be issued 4 and a half years after the last payment was made on the account?

 

I intend to send a SAR to the Original creditor but is there anything I need to do in the mean time to prevent court action?

 

Also, any ideas why the debt is not showing on the credit report?

Link to post
Share on other sites

because its fraud. and the creditor knows it.

 

it has prob never been there or has been removed.

 

the fact that a default has been issue after that period of time,

 

does not reset the SB date.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK dx100uk. Thanks for your advice, it is seriously appreciated.

 

If I deal with Halifax now is it likely they'll stop the DCA from taking this further or do I need to deal with the DCA seperately as well as Halifax?

 

Is it true that the debt shouldn't have been sold to TBI by Halifax if Halifax hadn't issued a default notice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

there is no such rule

 

if haliprats have sold it

 

that means they know its a lemon debt

 

pers i'd be ignoring both.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supposing TBI take this to court to try to obtain a CCJ:

 

Will the default notice being over four years after last payment/acknowledgement be enough reason for them to not win the judgement? (as default notice should be issued within 6 months)

Link to post
Share on other sites

guidelines not rules

 

no it wont help

 

but it will never get that far.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...