Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI Claim with limited information


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3994 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

After a couple of successes where I had irrefutable paperwork (Loan docs etc), I'm now turning to the harder cases. NB More details of wins to follow when other issues outstanding with that provider resolved.

 

This is on a card account, commenced in say 1995 (details obscured for obvious reasons).

 

Have a run of say 12 statements in 1996 showing PPI each month. Balance was never cleared - modest / minimum payments made. Core balance c £500 say.

 

Have a further run of statements from 2000 (similar number). However, by then the balance has more than trebled and core of £1,600, PPI shown each time until it appears account defaulted late 2000 when PPI stops but interest continues and don't use card notes appear on statement. At this time still making modest / minimum payments.

 

Account was settled in full with the aid of a consol loan from another provider in 2001 - and can prove final amount paid.

 

SAR has revealed virtually nothing bar account opening date, total number and value of purchases, total of interest charged etc.

 

My question is how to present a claim, what I can claim.

 

An account reconstruction is out - and I'm also uncertain of total PPI charges levied due to lack of info.

 

I'm happy that mis-selling reasons are valid. It is solely the mechanics I'm interested in.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

from the monthly PPI data you DO know

 

you are quite within your rights to use an avg of those for the months you do not know.

 

you can claim from the opening of the account until the day the interest stopped or the account was closed

 

use THEIR avg int rate[apr]. set the claim to date, as the day the account closed

 

take that total figure from the FOSCISHEET

 

and put it in the staint sheet from the day the account was settle till today.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX.

 

So, I have 12 @ avarege say £5 pm from 1996, and 10 @ avge £15 from 2000 (last 2 statements are ppost assumed default when no PPI charged, but interest carried on etc etc). So, I can show clearly a total of £210 PPI paid in those 22 months. Are you saying that I take the average of £9.55 (being £210/22) and apply that to each month?

Link to post
Share on other sites

se the avg of known payments from the statements showing PPI figure you paid.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry DX, not sure if that's a "yes" or not.

 

Let me try again. I have 12 statements from 1996 with total PPI on them of £60, hence my average of £5.

 

I have 10 from 2000 with PPI on, and the PPI on those 10 totals £150, hence the earlier £15 average..

 

I then have 2 more end of 2000 when no PPI was applied at all, as account was defaulted or similar. Interest continued to be applied until close in mid 2001.

 

In total therefore, where PPI was charged, the total I can evidence is £210 and that is over a total of 22 statements.

 

I do have a further 2 statements with no PPI on them (just for completeness, no it wasn't cancelled by me at that point).

 

So, let us say for simplicity that card taken out in 1 Jan 1995, and closed (paid off entirely) 30 June 2001.

 

On those fugures above, (obviously suitable disgiused) what do I show on the FOCintsheet please which asks for each monthly payment?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

where you know what you paid for a month use that

 

where you don't

yes use your avg you have worked out

 

that is acceptable under FOS guidelines.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...