Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bailiff visited my house today...... Help!!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3877 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I had a bailiff visit my house today for unpaid council tax. The firm was Ross and Roberts LTD.

 

We missed the call but a letter was posted through the door charging me £24.50 for the visit.

 

I've read through a few threads and am I right in thinking not to let them in or even deal direct with them.

 

I've seen it advised to start making payments online to the council and to write to them stating I will not deal with a bailiff only them.

 

All doors and windows are now looked down.

 

We have two vehicles, my girlfriend (she is not named on the letter or bill and my leased van for work.

Am I correct in thinking they can't touch either of these vehicles?

 

Any advice on how to handle this will be greatly appreciated!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to contact the council for the following info.

 

1 - how many Liability Orders they have against you

2 - the dates they were obtained

3 - the addresses they were for

4 - the period of time each covers

5 - how much each one was for

6 - how much is still outstanding

7 - the dates they were passed on for enforcement

8 - the dates & amounts of any payments

 

Depending on your situation, you may be able to make an arrangement with the council to pay them over a period of time. The council may not want to deal with the account, unless there are issues of vulnerability and may just tell you to deal with the bailiffs. There is nothing to force you to deal with the bailiffs, but you must ensure that you make payments to the council and confirm in writing to them what you will be doing i.e £x per month. You will still have to pay the bailiff for their first visit £24.50, but should avoid a further £18 visit fee, if you start to pay the council and the bailiffs are made aware of this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will still have to pay the bailiff for their first visit £24.50, but should avoid a further £18 visit fee, if you start to pay the council and the bailiffs are made aware of this.

 

i thought as long as you pay the liability order to the council the bailiff has no power to enforce his charges

:???: what me. never heard of you never had a debt with you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

i thought as long as you pay the liability order to the council the bailiff has no power to enforce his charges

 

I thought that the £24.50 is covered by legislation and if they visit before any payment is made, that you had to pay this.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have to pay the charges if you pay off the debt

 

If you pay off your debt in full to the creditor before the bailiffs are instructed, you don’t have to pay bailiff’s charges.

 

Once bailiffs have been asked to act, you'll usually have to pay their charges whether or not they can take your goods.

 

If you pay off the debt to the creditor but not the bailiffs’ charges that you owe, the bailiffs can’t take goods from you just to recover their own costs. They'll have to take action against you themselves to get the money back.

:???: what me. never heard of you never had a debt with you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

The bailiffs can still enforce for their fees using the liability order - make sure they are paid so this doesnt happen.

 

The Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

Regulation 45 in particular paragraphs 3 & 4

None of the beliefs held by "Freemen on the land" have ever been supported by any judgments or verdicts in any criminal or civil court cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the info so far, I will get straight onto the council tomorrow. I will also state that I won't be dealing with the bailiffs and will only deal with the council. I will set up a standing order to the council and inform them of this too.

 

Still slightly concerned about the vehicle situation. Is my girlfriends car in danger, we can always park it in the garage if that changes matters.

 

My vehicle is leased so should be safe I believe?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Still slightly concerned about the vehicle situation. Is my girlfriends car in danger, we can always park it in the garage if that changes matters. There is obviously a chance it could be, if putting it in your own garage then make sure the door is locked.

 

My vehicle is leased so should be safe I believe? To be on the safe side make sure you have a copy of the lease agreement handy, as it is a van is it sign written?

 

PT

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thank you.

 

Do you have any idea of how many times a ballifff will visit, is it just twice?

 

No hard & fast rule here. Some will try & make a nuisance of themselves by continually calling others may give up at the first opportunity. It is not something that will happen overnight.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll get the letter off to the council today.

 

Should I also write to the ballifff saying I won't deal with them but will be paying the council direct.

 

Once you have made a payment to the council and confirmed regular payments to them in writing, I would suggest that you confirm this to the bailiffs. You will have to pay the bailiffs the £24.50 for their visit at some point, otherwise they may return to continue enforcement.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hey guys, here's an update.

 

I wrote to the council saying I would only pay them and not the balif. I said I would pay via electronic transfer. They wrote back saying they would not accept my payment and any payments made would be put against this years bil.

 

I also wrote to the balif stating I would only pay the council, they wrote back saying action would only stop if the council told them to.

 

The bailiff has not been back round and I'm unsure of what to do next.

 

Any advice would really be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

....I wrote to the council saying I would only pay them and not the balif. I said I would pay via electronic transfer. They wrote back saying they would not accept my payment and any payments made would be put against this years bil.....

 

 

A suggestion would be to request that the council allocate your funds to the account of your choosing, if the department deems this to be outside its powers, ask that they seek the judgment of "Peter v Anderson".

 

"
A person who is indebted to another on two several accounts, may, on paying him money, ascribe it to which account he pleases.–and his election may either be expressed,-Or may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction
.

 

 

In case your interested there's some background to the system's allocation rules here in this Internal Audit Report.

 

 

3.3.1 The collection and reporting of Council Tax income is straightforward when a tax payer pays their annual charge within that year. Complexities arise when a Council Tax Payer falls into arrears and owes the council money for past years as well as the current year. There is significant case law (for example, Peter v Anderson (1814)) however, put simply, if a person specifies which years debt the payment should be assigned it should be assigned to that years debt.

 

3.3.2 The council tax system has built in allocation rules to ensure that the law with respect to specified payments is met. For instance, if a customer has a payment plan for any year of debt and the payment they make matches the planned instalment then the money will be allocated to that year (this is known as “hard” allocation on the council tax system). If the system is unable to “hard allocate” then it will instead “soft” allocate and the debt will be used against the oldest debt unless manually adjusted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

A suggestion would be to request that the council allocate your funds to the account of your choosing, if the department deems this to be outside its powers, ask that they seek the judgment of "Peter v Anderson".

 

"
A person who is indebted to another on two several accounts, may, on paying him money, ascribe it to which account he pleases.–and his election may either be expressed,-Or may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction
.

 

 

In case your interested there's some background to the system's allocation rules here in this Internal Audit Report.

 

This is brilliant, and relevant to me also. I get full CTB but as of april still have to pay £12 a month, and i have arrears which is about £650 going back over the last 3 years, i pay this back at a agreed £60 a month, I was told to make this years payments of £12 a month to the same account on a different day and it should emphasis on the should come of the correct debt i.e current years and previous years arrears. Didnt know i could specify a specific year for arrears to come off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Quick update

 

The council have refused to take any payments for the above debt?

 

I'm pretty fed up of having the curtains closed and having to park my car so far away. I have wrote to the bailiffs and stated that I would pay £50 a month, I also enclosed a copy of my vehicle lease so they are aware they can't levy that.

 

They wrote back saying they can only accept an arrangement if the bailiff is permitted to levy goods at my property. Obviously I don't want them anywhere near my house but at this point I see little option.

 

I want to get this over and done with now and set up a payment arrangement but without having my goods levied?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have any payments been made since June to either bailiff or council?

 

If you can transfer funds directly into the council's account there's nothing much they can do about it except allocate it to this year's account as they stated previously. Even that, I wouldn't think they could do if it was put in writing that a specified sum should pay off your previous year's debt.

 

Did you cite the judgment of Peter v Anderson ?

 

A person who is indebted to another on two several accounts, may, on paying him money, ascribe it to which account he pleases.–and his election may either be expressed,-Or may be inferred from the circumstances of the transaction.

 

 

Perhaps threaten the council with the LGO if they refuse to pay off the account which you specify.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Outlawla

 

No I've paid a payment yet as I didn't want to start paying the council if they weren't going to accept the payments. I will write another letter today quoting the case and wait for the reply.

 

I just to get this sorted now :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Outlawla

 

No I've paid a payment yet as I didn't want to start paying the council if they weren't going to accept the payments. I will write another letter today quoting the case and wait for the reply.

 

I just to get this sorted now :(

 

Pay something direct to the council online, don't wait for a reply, do it now, now, it gives you the moral high ground, no payment and they see you as another won't pay. Also have they refused payment in writing? if so they are acting unlawfully as they are bound by law to accept a tendered payment. Otherwise tebder a p[ayment at the council office and if refused get the drone to sign that they are refusing payment as it is with bailiffs, that is then your evidence for the complaint. that refusal then forms the basis of a Formal Complaint that they are refusing payments you suspect to garner fees for their bailiffs, who do not need a levy to accept an agreement, in fact to allow them to levy would be seriously detrimental to your wallet

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

The bailiff: A 12th Century solution re-branded as Enforcement Agents for the 21st Century to seize and sell debtors goods as before Oh so Dickensian!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Outlawla

 

No I've paid a payment yet as I didn't want to start paying the council if they weren't going to accept the payments. I will write another letter today quoting the case and wait for the reply.

 

I just to get this sorted now :(

 

 

If your council's computer system has the same allocation rules as that detailed in Milton Keynes' Internal Audit Report, your payment (theoretically) should be allocated to the oldest debt if it does not exactly match your instalment amount for the current year.

 

 

"
3
.
3
.
2
The council tax system has built in allocation rules to ensure that the law with respect to specified payments is met. For instance, if a customer has a payment plan for any year of debt and the payment they make matches the planned instalment then the money will be allocated to that year (this is known as “
hard
” allocation on the council tax system). If the system is unable to “
hard allocate
” then it will instead “soft” allocate and the debt will be used against the oldest debt unless manually adjusted.

 

Though of course, with the council, its always better to have something in writing and getting them to confirm they have received it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...