Jump to content
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times. ×


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • robertobaggio
      soccersixes chasing owed money

      By robertobaggio · Posted

      Hi there Manager for our soccer sixes team moved overseas mid season and we struggled for numbers so we told the ref about 5 weeks prior to seasons end that we would see out these games then be done and he told us he’d ’pass the message on to the relevant people’. Heard nothing, then 3 days prior to the new season beginning we were given our fixture for that weekend. Told the guy over text we had pulled out and the ref should’ve passed a message on but we were told sufficient notice wasn’t given and it needed to be in writing. I argued it’s not our fault the ref didn’t do as he said but we were countered by the T&Cs.    now being chased for what was £608 kindly reduced to £476 to pay off remainder of the season. Been sent a letter in the post from their accountancy team and told needs to be paid by Friday.   seen a lot of the other threads saying we can literally just ignore everything but im concerned about debt collections and credit score being harmed. Can anyone confirm if this all works/what we should do?   thanks
    • sprouting
      Prosecution witness in criminal court case.

      By sprouting · Posted

      Hi,   I have given an official police witness statement for the prosecution in an upcoming criminal court case, and I am very anxious about what might happen.  Specifically regarding being cross-examined.  My statement is very short, and only a couple of paragraphs long, regarding a conversation I had with one of the victims.  I have tried to research online about what information about me the defence barrister might be able to find and use to discredit me.  I have by no means have a shady past but, I am concerned about what private information might be brought up, and as this is a case that will be in the national press as it is in the public interest.  The two preliminary hearings were reported in the papers.   I have tried to research  online what information the opposition can seek, but it is all very complicated.  I believe that they can legally access public records, but I'm not sure what information public records hold.  Can they access my medical records, educational history, HMRC, and Department for Work and Pensions? (I am a self employed sole trader).  I was arrested once, and this was unfortunately instigated by the victim in this case, so could well be of interest to them.  It resulted in no further action, however I have only discovered this week that that, in fact, this means I have a criminal record, and will be so until I am 100 (no chance)! This has really annoyed me to say the least, especially since I asked him afterwards why he rang the police and he said 'for a laugh'.  So I have started to look into applying for it to be deleted, but again, if anyone has any advice on this I would be appreciative. At the moment, my name isn't on the confirmed list to give evidence, but the detective I have been dealing with has said it is 'likely'. The names of the victims in this case will not be allowed to be reported, are witnesses fair game for the press? I really need no know how deep they can delve in to my life so I am prepared if my character gets assassinated in front of the nation. I really wish I'd never agreed to this.   Many thanks
    • Baz1994
      Quidie Ltd T/A Fernovo Payday Loan Irresponsible Lending Offer

      By Baz1994 · Posted

      A belated thanks dx. Yes I may take your advice regarding StepChange. I am finding that I am telling them (on behalf of my Son) the true balances outstanding? They never seem to check properly in which worries me. If I was to take on myself is there another way of dealing with various debts? I have already submitted other IRL complaints on his behalf. Today I have received a further response from Quidie T/A Fernovo confirming that they will waiver all interest paid.
    • UsedCarMan
      Lowell/Shoes SPC Claim Forfar Sheriff Court - Old Newday Credit Card.

      By UsedCarMan · Posted

      Good evening  Case hearing this Friday 26/04. looking to have all my prep/papers ready.    just checking in to get update on my last post , ( the t&c’s attached). No name or address on them as per #49   thank you UCM  
    • redcandle2
      Alliance ANPR NTK - overstay - Padstow Harbour Car Park

      By redcandle2 · Posted

      Thanks a lot.  I did read every single post and though the process was fairly clear at a high level, I just wanted to be sure in the areas a posted. Call it first time nerves, going down this route.  Thanks again.

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.

      BankFodder posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • Big Motoring World Enfield /Blackhorse - done over on car - @BigMotoringWrld

      ATJ posted a topic in Vehicle retailers and manufacturers,

      Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,

    • A2Dominion - Housing Association property flooding - damning ombudsman report

      WanTToMoveOn posted a topic in Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues,

      Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
      WanTToMoveOn

      Picked By

      WanTToMoveOn,

    • Post in Suing a parcel delivery company when you don't have a direct contract with them – third-party rights Copy of judgment available

      BankFodder posted a post in a topic,

      We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
      BankFodder

      Picked By

      BankFodder,
    View All

  • Recommended Topics

Twitter X - Include the @company's twitter name in your post title – here's why…
The UK Stands With Ukraine - 'Slava Ukraini'
Parcel delivery insurance is prohibited under section 57 – Consumer Rights Act – Read about It Here and in The Times.

Repossession questioned by deeds not being signed

IS IT ME?

By IS IT ME?
in Mortgages and Secured Loans

 Share
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

p.j

p.j

Posted
Posted

Hi Apple IS IT ME hope your both well been a bit busy over the weekend just kept an eye on things not posted up.

 

Hi Alisono mine should be with yours then would like a copy if that's ok..I cannot pm anyone again do not know why this is maybe the site team can deal with that issue or are we back to square one trying to force everything on to the thread again?

 

pj.

e-petition is live please sign it.. unlawful repossessions..!!!

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
p.j

p.j

Posted
Posted
For your information there is a glitch with the PM system which we hope to have fixed tomorrow (Monday)

 

ok i believe you i really do but its funny i could pm xyh20 who is viewing the thread but not any of my fellow members?any way not to make a song and dance about it onwards and upwards .....i will look for the ref number Alisono thanks :wink:

 

pj.

e-petition is live please sign it.. unlawful repossessions..!!!

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
IS IT ME are you saying now that this thread only concerns securitised mortgages and no one else has anything to worry about in relation to the points apple has been making I thought it applied to all mortgages securitised or not ,if so that shines a whole new light on the subject matter and in my view needs clarifying in quick time [ apple]

kegi

 

Hi Kegi

 

It is a fact that one of the main criteria of entry to the securities markets – is that a lender (originator) .... must ‘own’ legal title.......another essential element is that the deed must be/remain in ‘escrow’.

 

(‘escrow’ to you and me, in practice; means – ‘un-execucted’ by the Lender and signed only by the Borrower)

 

There is no doubt - A ‘mortgage’ is a complete disposition of the Borrowers legal estate and charge....a ‘mortgage’ facilitates the means by which a lender secures ‘ownership’ of the borrowers legal estate – regardless as to whether the land is ‘un-registered’ or ‘registered’.

 

We now know....if the borrowers estate was registered.....the ‘mortgage’ of it - is un-lawful; on the ground that - the borrower has no ‘power’ to grant a ‘mortgage’ of his registered estate.

 

( a ‘charge by way of legal mortgage’ is the same as a ‘mortgage by demise or sub-demise and a legal sub- mortgage is a ‘charge by way of legal mortgage...all of which are not permitted within the general law in regard to a registered estate)

 

(‘Full Title Guarantee’ – this is the disposition of the ‘title’ in whole – see: section 10 Trustee Delegation Act....and LPMPA 1994)

 

We now know.....a deed that is signed by the Borrower only – is a deed in ‘escrow’ and stands to facilitate the complete disposition of the borrowers registered estate/charge.....all rights legal and equitable to the borrowers ‘title’ to the favour of the lender.

 

The Borrower and his money acts to facilitate the Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS)– the Borrower and his money is the ‘conduit’.....to facilitate the investors of the MBS scheme....

 

The FCA is the new Listing Authority. I believe there is a conflict of interest - this department like the FSA before it.....authorise the listing of MBS.....authorise and ‘approve’ the representation of companies to act on behalf of the ‘principal’ lender (originator)...These ‘AR’s’ - target and make every borrowers life a misery.....

 

such is the need to service the MBS.... that they do not care that a borrower is made homeless... all that appears to be important when an MBS is in the background - is that the borrowers estate is sold on and another borrower take that borrowers place to service the MBS.....

 

So, in answer to the question......Does this thread only apply to lenders who securitise?

 

NO.....the detail in this thread will not only assist those who can evidence that the 'mortgage' has been securitised by their lender - it will ALSO apply to all and every lender who ‘mortgages’ registered land...and to any and every lender who has not executed the deed.....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
God evening all. I have posted the petition on face book and linked in not real a twitter person but a friend has over2,000 followers so will ask them tomorrow . I have forwarded to Channel 4 and BBC so will let you know if I get a response.

 

:-) onwards And upwards on this

 

Brilliant...Thanks Alisono.......might be an idea for all those with a facebook account to do the same ; )

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Hi Apple IS IT ME hope your both well been a bit busy over the weekend just kept an eye on things not posted up.

 

Hi Alisono mine should be with yours then would like a copy if that's ok..I cannot pm anyone again do not know why this is maybe the site team can deal with that issue or are we back to square one trying to force everything on to the thread again?

 

pj.

 

The SPML MSA is here on this thread.....can't think which page now...but it is definitely here...... ; )

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Hi Apple got that one... ; )

 

 

pj

 

Brilliant.... : )

 

At the back in the 'appendix'.....there should be a list of every single 'mortgage' account number (if memory serves me well) - just look through them .... and I can almost guarantee; yours will be there.....

 

When you find it......you can be 1000% sure your loan account - pooled has been sold....

 

It might be worth having a look at the fca register.......to check out who is 'preferred's' appointed representative.....or if 'acenden' are collecting your money...might be worth checking to see who the say their 'principal' is......it should show 'preferred'.....but...let's discuss?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted

Does your lender have FCA authority to hold client money?

 

http://www.fca.org.uk/firms/systems-reporting/register/use/firm-status

 

This is what the FCA say:...

 

"Further information

 

You might also find that a firm is described as being 'unable to hold client money', which means it is not allowed to have cheques or money paid to it when it sells a particular product. In this case you would make your cheque or bankers draft payable to the firm providing the product, even though you give it to the firm providing advice or arranging the sale."

 

Just thought i'd share this 'titbit' of information with you all....get you thinking....

 

If you find on the FCA register that this 'limitation' is attached to the 'regulated activities' registered for your lender....or...given the recent 'interim permissions' going on....the 'administrator of the loan'...or check through the 'approved representatives' of your lenders choice............then it makes sense to beg the question........WHO IS TAKING/GETTING MY MONEY...off the back of an un-executed deed....which relates to an unlawful mortgage of my registered estate?????

 

....And....do they have FCA 'permission' to do so???????

 

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
p.j

p.j

Posted
Posted
Brilliant.... : )

 

At the back in the 'appendix'.....there should be a list of every single 'mortgage' account number (if memory serves me well) - just look through them .... and I can almost guarantee; yours will be there.....

 

 

 

 

When you find it......you can be 1000% sure your loan account - pooled has been sold....

 

It might be worth having a look at the fca register.......to check out who is 'preferred's' appointed representative.....or if 'acenden' are collecting your money...might be worth checking to see who the say their 'principal' is......it should show 'preferred'.....but...let's discuss?

 

Apple

 

Hi Apple think i checked this before Acenden have no authority to hold client money ...

 

pj

e-petition is live please sign it.. unlawful repossessions..!!!

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/56915

Link to post
Share on other sites
kegi

kegi

Posted
Posted
Kegi

Whos yours with?

 

IS IT ME Mine is a 1984 abbey mortgage orig paper deeds and me and the wife are down as owners absolute and abbey are in the charges section only .the charge itself says we the borrower charge the property by way of legal mortgage with the sum of all monies owed to the lender, me and wife have signed plus a witness and says signed under seal and that's all

My daughters have both a Halifax 1988,2001 which show them both as owner absolute and Halifax in the charges register only

but neither it appears have been sent from [sol] a copy of the charge deed so cannot comment on that

kegi

ps so according to what apple sent me in response to my previous post none of these were/are encumbered

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Hi Apple think i checked this before Acenden have no authority to hold client money ...

 

pj

 

ah ah......Did you check out their 'permissions'?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Preferred have a registered name on there but trading as yellow brick road direct mortgages ?

 

'Yellow Brick Road Mortgages'...... is that a 'genuine' company name....lol??

 

Who are their 'tied agents' etc??......does it say 'Acenden'?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted
Kegi

Whos yours with?

 

IS IT ME Mine is a 1984 abbey mortgage orig paper deeds and me and the wife are down as owners absolute and abbey are in the charges section only .the charge itself says we the borrower charge the property by way of legal mortgage with the sum of all monies owed to the lender, me and wife have signed plus a witness and says signed under seal and that's all

My daughters have both a Halifax 1988,2001 which show them both as owner absolute and Halifax in the charges register only

but neither it appears have been sent from [sol] a copy of the charge deed so cannot comment on that

kegi

ps so according to what apple sent me in response to my previous post none of these were/are encumbered

 

Was the property you took a loan for with the Abbey a 'New Build'?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted

 

Was the property you took a loan for with the Abbey a 'New Build'?

 

Apple

 

Hi Kegi...

 

I asked you the question above, purely because I am conscious that it is within the general law to 'mortgage' a new build...to 'charge the property by way of legal mortgage'

 

When Abbey (now Santander) get 'mortgages'......they pool them and sell them on....much the same like a number of the Lenders we are coming across on this thread...

 

Here is the Link to ALL the documentation that you may find of interest...includes the Mortgage Sale Agreements and everything else...

 

http://www.aboutsantander.co.uk/investors/debt-investors/holmes-master-trust/holmes-master-trust-documentation.aspx

 

Your daughters, will need to acquire their 'deeds'...costs £11 for a copy......from HMLR....

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
applecart

applecart

Posted
Posted

 

No apple ex council

kegi

 

Hi Kegi......as an ex-council house....it would seem to me that it would have been registered for the 'first time' with HMLR when you applied for the 'right to buy'......this would be the 'trigger' - your lender was ok in applying a 'mortgage' .....

 

However, It sounds as though you have never looked to change the Abbey (Santander) for another lender...is this true?....are you still with the Abbey (Santander)?

 

Apple

[COLOR="red"][B][CENTER]"Errors do not cease to be errors simply because they’re ratified into law.” [/CENTER][/B][/COLOR][B][CENTER] E.A. Bucchianeri[/CENTER][/B]

Link to post
Share on other sites
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3707 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


Follow: @real_CAG

Navigation Links

Welcome
CAG Community Centre
CAG Library
Banks & Credit
Other financial Institutions
Retail
Non-Retail
Work & Social
PayDay and Short term Loans
Debt
Motoring
Legal

Latest

Our Picks


Help and Support

CAG Library
Questions about This Site
Change your notification sound
Change your profile picture - FREE!


Useful LInks

County Court Forms
MoneyClaim Online
CPR - Pre-Action Protocols
Civil Procedure Rules
UK Legislation
Youth Consumer Service

Reclaim the right Ltd

registered in the UK
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS

The Consumer Action Group

The National Consumer Service
×
×
  • Create New...