Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
    • Unless I've got an incorrect copy of the relevant regulation: The PCN is only deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch "unless the contrary is proved" in which case date of delivery does matter (not just date of posting) and I would like clarification of the required standard of proof. It seems perhaps this hasn't been tested. Since post is now barcoded for the Post Office's own tracking purposes perhaps there is some way I can get that evidence from the Post Office...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Merligen Investments - default


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi... Thanks for taking the time to read. I will try and keep it brief and straight to the point.

 

I entered into a finance agreement on 21/11/2007 with Clode Retail Finance, now V12 Finance, (dabs: computer I think) for £1013. I kept up repayments of £26 a month until July 2009. Checking my noddle credit report it shows that on 26/03/2010 the account was ended and settled. This was after more than 6 months of non payment and it is now showing as DA (debt assigned) on the March 2010 entry. I assumed at the time it had been defaulted.

 

I have received countless letters over the past 3 years from numerous DCA's. One in particular I remember was PDP Management Services Ltd. I ignored them all and haven't received anything from any company in the past year.

 

I checked my Noddle report today and I now see a default has been registered on 11/03/2013 for £875 (the closing balance was £805) by Merligen Investments.

 

I have had no letters or contact from them at all. I am 90% certain that letters in he past from other companies mentioned it had defaulted in 2010. Can they do this? Is there anyway I can get this default removed or at least dated back to 2010?

 

Also... this only appears on my noddle(callcredit) report. There is no record of any of it on my equifax report and only a settled in 2010 with V12 Finance on my experian report.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why did you stop paying? What correspondence did you enter into when you stopped? At that time there was £493 left on the account.

 

Sorry I forgot myself.. I think it was on Buy Now Pay 12 months later. So the end balance at the time I stopped paying was £805 and not as low as it would have been.

 

I stopped paying as at the time I was struggling with credit cards, loans, mortgage etc. I had to prioritise with what I could pay and keeping a roof over our head and food on the table was the priority.

 

I didn't enter into any agreement or have any contact with them. I just stopped paying and "buried my head in the sand".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well clearly then you defaulted on the account, so I'm not sure why you would think you could get the default removed. Look and see when the account is being reported to; whilst a new owner can continue to report the default they can't reset the date. But if you did as you say, your credit file is shot to bits anyway so why are you worried about this particular entry? You could SAR the original creditor to ascertain the actual date of default and go from there. But the default will not drop off until 6 years have passed (paid or otherwise).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well clearly then you defaulted on the account, so I'm not sure why you would think you could get the default removed. Look and see when the account is being reported to; whilst a new owner can continue to report the default they can't reset the date. But if you did as you say, your credit file is shot to bits anyway so why are you worried about this particular entry? You could SAR the original creditor to ascertain the actual date of default and go from there. But the default will not drop off until 6 years have passed (paid or otherwise).

 

Thanks for the reply brokebutnotbeatn. I don't think I've made myself clear sorry. I accept I have defaulted. I'm not disputing I've defaulted and not saying the default should be removed completely. I just wanted to find out what I can do to get them to change the default date back to when I thought it had defaulted, March 2010. Are they allowed to register the default 3 years after if the original creditor "forgot" to default the account at the time.

 

I know my credit was shot to bits at the time, but I have done my best to be squeaky clean over the past 3 years and have not missed or had any late payments on my agreements since. I was looking forward to six years being up and getting a clean slate. Seems the six year countdown has started again and all my hardwork trying to rectify by previous mistakes and come back to kick me up the a**.

 

I'm starting to think the original creditor never defaulted the account in 2010. So my main question is can a default be registered 3 years after the closed account by a DCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The time to challenge the default date would be when the debt has become statute barred. So you need to understand when your last payment was as this is what sets the SB clock, not the date of default.

 

The last payment I made was in March 2009 which took my balance to £805. No payments were made from then and the account was closed on 26/03/2010 with a mark on noddle credit file as DA (debt assigned).

 

I'm currently looking at at getting a mortage and I have lenders who will lend to me as long as the defaults I have are over 2 years old. Which they were until this month and this has appeared from 3 years ago. So I can't just sit and wait to dispute it when becomes SB in March 2015.

 

I need to either get the default date moved to the date the account was closed (which I assumed this was the date they had defaulted it... seems they haven't by DA on credit file).

Or... get in touch with them and come to an agreement to pay the default and ask them to remove it from my file as it was issued 3 years after the account was 6 months in arrears and had been closed (ico guide says: "Accounts should normally be filed as being in default where those payments due have not been received for six months.") Also, I haven't received any correspondence from this Merligen DCA to inform me it will be defaulted.

 

Any ideas what my best cause of action would be to get this sorted?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

getting defaults removed can be a long and hard battle. I might start 'in ignorance' with Merligen - in this instance hit the phone and say this has 'appeared' on your credit file, what's it about as you haven't defaulted on anything so are mystified and work backwards. This wouldn't be what I'd normally suggest but you have a different objective. I don't believe an account would have been sold on without it being in default so you should get to the original marker in which case you can get it as you say paid off and if not removed the marker date corrected. But you shouldn't do anything without getting it in writing. However, you might find the path a very frustrating one I'm afraid. There is a 'Credit Reference Agency' section. Look in there and see if Brigadier has any better suggestions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've just sent an email basically asking them to amend the date to the original default date (if it was defaulted in 2010) or to completely remove the default as it was registered 3 years after (stating ICO good practice for filing defaults 3-6 months)...

 

Also mentioned haven't received no default notice or warning from them.

 

I will update thread on any replies...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...