Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • did you submit your directions
    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

MiniCredit & Opos


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3572 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 66
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The laughable thing about this whole situation is that it's been (so far) 16 weeks and 6 days since I first raised the complaint with MiniCredit. Their own complaints procedure states 8 weeks from start to finish!!!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seriously this Kristel Martinson woman is totally and utterly cuckoo!!!

 

Email today is

 

Dear XXXX XXXX

 

Thank you for the reply

 

I sent you the email below on the 30th of July but have not received a reply from you

 

Then she's attached her email from the 30th July which I'm not copying out again but it's further up this thread.

 

No I didn't respond to this email as I think that £183.54 as a gesture of goodwill is a ridiculously low offer, especially after the hassle I've had to go through to get to this point and the fact that it's been 16 weeks since I originally started the complaint and I still don't have a final response from her.

 

At the end of the day £1090 on a £200 loan is extortion, they know it, I know it and I'm not going to accept such a low offer. I've emailed her back with the following which has been copied to the FOS

 

Ms Martinson

 

Your email was forwarded to the FOS and I agree that I did not respond to you as I do not accept the gesture of goodwill payment as offered. Furthermore your email of 12th September states you have attempted to contact me via phone which I take to be between 30th July and 12th September. This is not correct and in addition you have been advised on several occassions that I will only correspond in written format.

 

It has now been over 16 weeks since I first raised this complaint with your company and we are still to come to a conclusion to the matter. This 16 week period is very much over the 8 week period as stated in your complaints procedure. This matter has not only taken up a lot of my time but has caused me several months of distress and therefore I feel that your offer of goodwill does not reflect this nor does it reflect the fact I feel I have been overcharged.

 

Now she's just emailed me with this

 

Thank you for your reply!

 

We will be waiting for the contact from the Financial Ombudsman Service to provide them all evidence regarding your account

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now now, please don't be so nice about her. Cuckoo would suggest she has an excuse for being stupid, ignorant, incompetent, possibly non existent and generally in need of a good slap

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Goes on for as long as it needs to. For now, i wouldnt worry about it. Let the FOS do their job.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Had a response from the FOS

 

Dear XXXX

 

I am emailing to provide you with an update on your complaint. I have received all the requested information from Microcredit and completed my review of your complaint. I have issued my assessment to Microcredit and am waiting for its response. I will update you on my next steps once I have received a response.

 

Yours sincerely

 

I might get a decision soon then!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found out my partner paid £416.25 on a loan that was originally £100, and now the company in question is seeking further £1033.55 from her (in which she ignores the requests now).

 

My advice is the following;

 

- Report to the OFT (The payday loan industry is being watched through a magnifying glass right now), I have my own case handler who I've send a full report and all evidence of emails and communications and a witness statement.

- Dispute with the Financial Ombudsman (it will cost them £550 in fees alone).

- Anything you've paid except for the original loan amount and one months interest is reclaimable. I'm already instigating legal proceedings on behalf of my partner for £270 in over payments plus other fees we're claiming. Start out with a recorded delivery letter before legal proceedings (notice of intended litigation) (this is the stage we're at). Advise them of their obligations under the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct in regards to disclosure of arguments and so forth, give them 28 days to settle your dispute, after the 28 days is up, file a claim with the county court (you can do this via money claim online), which dependent on the amount you claim will cost you a small claim fee. And follow progress from there.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I can ask.

On what grounds are you making a claim ?

 

How have you managed to get a case handler at the OFT when they always seem to reply that they do not take on individual cases?

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I can ask.

On what grounds are you making a claim ?

 

How have you managed to get a case handler at the OFT when they always seem to reply that they do not take on individual cases?

 

The companies i'm dealing with all operate under one known main company (WebLoansProcessing). As you can see from these forums they are probably the worst and most aggressive in the PayDay loan industry.

 

My claim is to recover my partners over payments and further costs for dealing with their company to mediate the issue. Also another factor of our claim is predicated on an ongoing series of harassment to extract money from my partner that is not due neither is it payable to them. This has caused significant alarm, harassment and distress contrary to Section 3(1) of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. My case currently is 7 pages long (not including the evidence of this harassment).

 

You are correct about the OFT, however the above company has obviously received a large volume of complaints and the OFT is building a case against them (the only reason I can assume they're wanting all of this information).

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is about Minicredit which unless i am mistaken is not part of the webloan processing group.

 

I wish you all the luck in the world and IMHO the harassment aspect is a no brainer however if the contract is similar to those of minicredit i.e a line of credit you may have difficulties in getting back the extra money. I would love to be proved wrong

 

As far as I am aware as well there is nothing to say that the maximum amount repayable is loan+ 1 months interest. This is a discussion that was had long ago on here and to date no one has been able to prove this point

 

Good luck keep us informed

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is about Minicredit which unless i am mistaken is not part of the webloan processing group.

 

I wish you all the luck in the world and IMHO the harassment aspect is a no brainer however if the contract is similar to those of minicredit i.e a line of credit you may have difficulties in getting back the extra money. I would love to be proved wrong

 

As far as I am aware as well there is nothing to say that the maximum amount repayable is loan+ 1 months interest. This is a discussion that was had long ago on here and to date no one has been able to prove this point

 

Good luck keep us informed

 

Thank you.

 

Minicredit aren't part of the WebLoansProcessing group (I was just offering some advice in case you wanted to go down the path of reclaiming charges).

 

I highly doubt anyone could justify their high charges and fees (regardless of whether they're written within a contract). Whilst I am aware that there is no specific legislation or case law by where the whole amount + one months interest theory has been successful, I do think that generally PayDay loan contracts are taken out for no more than 28 days, and after the default on the contract I don't see how they can add a high amount of fees on a weekly basis.

 

Thanks, I will do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok so I've had a response from the FOS as so..

 

what your complaint is about

 

My understanding of your complaint is that you are unhappy with the amount of interest and charges Microcredit has applied to your account. You have explained that these charges were applied whilst you were facing financial difficulties. You also feel the amount of charges applied to be excessive and incorrect.

 

Microcredit’s offer

 

Following our involvement, Microcredit has told us that it is prepared to refund you 50% of the direct debit attempt fees, which totals £177. Microcredit is also willing to refund additional interest it has explained that you have paid which amounts to £6.24.

You now need to consider this offer.

 

When doing so, you may wish to bear in mind that the information provided does not indicate that you made Microcredit aware of your financial situation. Further to this, the terms of the agreement do indicate that Microcredit will attempt to collect payment three times per day.

 

what to do next and the timescales for responding

 

If you accept the offer, please sign the enclosed settlement form and return it to me. On the other hand, if you do not feel able to accept the offer, please let me know why, so that I can consider any further points.

 

In our leaflet, your complaint and the ombudsman, we explain about your right to ask the ombudsman to review your complaint – as the final stage in our process. But I hope that now an offer has been made by the business, you will not feel the need to take your complaint further.

 

I'm still not happy about this offer of £183.24 but is there any point in declining the offer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Decline the offer and tell the silly adjudicator that the charges are unlawful.

 

Seems the adjudicators are ttryingto brush the matter under the carpet to get the wait times down.

 

You can also escalate it to the ombudsman if the adjudicator tries to fob you off.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No fletch. They are saying their normal crap. They will wipe 50% of the unenforceable fees but still want the op to pay everything else.

 

Its their standard reply because they know the adjudicators are useless.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

No fletch. They are saying their normal crap. They will wipe 50% of the unenforceable fees but still want the op to pay everything else.

 

Its their standard reply because they know the adjudicators are useless.

 

Many apologises I got my posters mixed up

 

I agree with renegade tell them to go and do one. Even if the ombudsman doesn't rule in your favour they would still have to start court proceedings and that would be "interesting"

Any opinion I give is from personal experience .

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its the FOS who have now mediated and this is the first offer received from MiniCredit which surprisingly was MiniCredits original offer as a "gesture of goodwill". What the FOS are saying is I have until 30th December to either accept this offer or decline it, if I decline I have to give my reasons for declining. To be honest I'm getting to the point of saying stuff it accept the £183 and be done with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a point in declining, whilst Minicredit have in their T&Cs that they can 'collect three times a day' it is an unfair term and should be highlighted as such to the Adjudicator, use the OFT Guidelines in Debt Collecting and quote the PDL sectors own recommendations, they have been posted on this site,

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Latest from the FOS is that although the assessor has upheld my complaint minicredit disagrees with this decision so its now been escalated to the ombudsman for further assessment. God only knows when I'll see a resolution to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, minicredit is bound to disagree. They want money and they dont care how they get it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...