Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • not interested in silly letter   the CCa return please   dx  
    • This is interesting as I was not aware that there was a difference in the PPI claims/calculations.  Long story: I asked for this PPI reclaim over 5 years ago.  The Woolwich loan was taken out when I had a Woolwich current account.  The banking sort code for Woolwich was deleted off the banking system when Barclays inherited it hence they could not find my current account let alone the loan.  They had told me that I had provide proof of the loan as they could not locate it.  I did the FCA deadline search and it still was not located.  As this was the last resort, I had to go into the loft and found it by chance.  They changed the new reference number from the seach and attached it to the old past reference number as the complaint was still on their system.  Even speaking to them about their calculations and the one I got from the on-line calculators, no one can explain the difference, they just keep saying that they cannot speak to the PPI calculations team, they have to email them!  Also I thought the Plevin paragraph was standard information.  So this is where the mystery lies, I can reject the Plevin calculation and ask for calculations based on my actual PPI sums paid, would this then be in line with your calculator?
    • so who remembers this utter cobblers spun by the right wing (which was of course denied by Nissan - as it was cobblers)   https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-7962367/Nissans-Brexit-boost-Car-giant-secret-plan-close-EU-factories.html
    • If only that was his worst .. absolute peanuts compared to his recent wastes though ..   £500 million to tory pals in failing to collect a couple of hundred spit samples a day £12 Billion on Trace a test which has largely collapsed at the very start of the winter upsurge £88-100 Billion+ on Brexit as of earlier this year just in lost growth (from memory) Over a £Trillion in assets fled to the EU (Including Redwood and Ress Mogg) £288 million a week ongoing for Brexit and post brexit customs bureaucracy - whenever they get the systems running Nissan and Toyota saying UK taxpayer pay any Brexit tariff bills or Plants including Sunderland are unsustainable   How much are the lorry parks costing?   ... and he still REFUSES to feed hungry UK kids  
    • If the windows had already been made and were ready to install, he would surely have offered to do it without further delay.   Instead of arguing the toss with you, why is he not trying to sort a day to install and rescue the situation.   Despite the good reviews for the company, I'm not impressed but see what Bankfodder suggests.
  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Refusing to be assessed by a specific Doctor/HCP


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2650 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Does anyone know if it is possible to refuse an assessment by a specific person, e.g. if you feel there would be a conflict of interest?

 

How about if you have had a previous dispute with the doctor where DWP have effectively accepted that the doctor was severely mistaken in their version of events - i.e. it was an out and out fabrication?

 

This may be giving away my identity if ATOS read these threads, but is it reasonable to give a 4 hour time slot where the HCP might arrive for a home assessment? This means that both myself and my carer have to be ready for the assessment to start for a very long time, it will severely disrupt our usual routine and it will completely exhaust me.

Edited by reallymadwoman

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since no one seems to have an opinion and I want this assessment done finally, I'm not going to make a fuss over this particular HCP - but I won't be entirely relying on the ATOS recording equipment either.

 

I am going to query the extended time slot as I think that's wholly unreasonable.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you feel theres a conflict of interest, you need to provide complete proof of it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is interesting....I made a complaint about the last assessor due to the lies on the atos report and I don't want her again, wouldn't trust myself not to slap her one for the stress and grief she caused me, the two faced liar!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arent ATOS a private company and theyre actually paid by the government to recommend people back into work?

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

yes they are and I was by far not the first or only one since to have a report made on my health that totally ignored the true state of my health and declared me fit to work, overturned by a tribunal almost 18 months later, now there is an option to have the assessments recorded due to the level of complaints and tribunal hearings in favour of the claimant. it doesn't seem right to HAVE to have the same assessor again, hopefully it wont happen as there are so many, and from what I gather, the "dodgy" ones refuse to conduct recorded assessments, soooooooooooooooooo .............we shall see!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would definitely refuse to have the same fake HCP who fabricated my last assessment yes!

 

I will also be asking the so called HCP exactly what qualifies them to assess my particular disability, and if they don't have the necessary qualifications, or rather experience, then I won't be going through their interrogation process.

 

Put simply, ATOS refer to us as their 'customers' and NOT patients. Therefore as a customer I demand to be treated like I would if I were to eat a meal at a high end restaurant.

 

In some respects, I think we need to attack them from a different angle, as part of my mantra taught me by the Anti Terrorist (youtube) the master and servant approach.

The master always asks the questions, the servant always answers them, maybe we should be the ones asking them the questions, ie when the HCP wanted to give me a simple physical examination, instead of blindly accepting this, I should have asked him "How is this assessing my mental disability?"

 

I know now for any future interrogation they might throw at me.

Every time they ask a question I will ask them and myself, how is that assessing my particular disability?

 

Their interrogation tick chart is flawed as it tries to encompass any and every possible disability into a series of questions that you cannot possibly answer.

One persons disability is completely different from anothers, you cannot have a one size fits all test to assess all of us.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem is that there is only one HCP in my area qualified to do my assessment because it's a home assessment and I have neurological issues so if I challenge them I could be waiting another 16 months to be assessed whilst they try to find someone else. In effect, I have no choice but to be assessed by this HCP.

 

This particular HCP was 'mistaken' in the explanation given to DWP about when/if they tried to assess me. At the very least DWP have accepted that the HCP was mistaken because they have accepted that I had good cause for not being assessed on that occasion. Sorry if that sounds a bit convoluted, but providing any further detail would definitely identify me. I do not trust this HCP and cannot believe that they will be approaching my assessment with an open mind since this incident plus my previous complaint against them has got to affect how they view me. It could be positive in that they will be extremely careful to make sure they get this assessment right but I think it's more likely that they'll hold a grudge. I am almost expecting the recording equipment to malfunction hence having a back up plan.

 

What I am going to do is write (with copy to MP) that I am not happy about being assessed by this person for reasons which I will detail, but feel I have no choice if I want this saga to ever end. If/when it comes to appeal I then have a reasonable explanation for not refusing assessment by this HCP.

 

Does this seem reasonable?

 

What about the 4 hour time slot for them to arrive? Anyone else had a home assessment and had a time slot that long? All my previous ones have been one hour.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the same concerns as you about this HCP.

 

I fail to see how using the same one would ever be anything but fair.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its being done in your own home then you are fully within your rights to do your own recording anyway, its on your own private property. I would do this regardless of what they do or don't bring. I would also still have someone there to witness anything/everything, set the recording for when they are due as its time/dated? and i would stop and re-start it at intervals if they hadn't turned up. Just to show that you were there and ready etc. I must sound totally bonkers but i so don't trust this lot at all. I would also be on the phone to them if they were late and asking where the "assessor" is, taking name of person i spoke to and time/date etc. Call me miss marple lol the family do lol ............

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest not out and out refusing anything : but instead play them at their own "reasonableness" game.

 

Rather than risking being seen as "difficult" by refusing an assessor, highlight the previous difficulties you have had and leave them with the choice. If they send someone else then you've got what you wanted : if they send the person you've warned them about & they score against you again then when you appeal you can put then onus on them to show you weren't discriminated against by someone you had warned them about their previous flawed assessment.

 

The same with the time slot : whilst a more specific slot might mean you and your carer were ready "on time" : you'll endeavour to fit with their timescales but if they arrive at a bad time - surely as you warned them they'll be reasonable and fit in with you and your carers usual activities : after all, this is a reflection of the challenges of your disability.

 

Aim to show how reasonable you are within the bounds of your disability, and how unreasonable they are.

You will be recording it, and don't mind them recording it either : you have nothing to hide, but want them to asses you fairly and openly.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd suggest not out and out refusing anything : but instead play them at their own "reasonableness" game.

 

Rather than risking being seen as "difficult" by refusing an assessor, highlight the previous difficulties you have had and leave them with the choice. If they send someone else then you've got what you wanted : if they send the person you've warned them about & they score against you again then when you appeal you can put then onus on them to show you weren't discriminated against by someone you had warned them about their previous flawed assessment.

 

The same with the time slot : whilst a more specific slot might mean you and your carer were ready "on time" : you'll endeavour to fit with their timescales but if they arrive at a bad time - surely as you warned them they'll be reasonable and fit in with you and your carers usual activities : after all, this is a reflection of the challenges of your disability.

 

Aim to show how reasonable you are within the bounds of your disability, and how unreasonable they are.

You will be recording it, and don't mind them recording it either : you have nothing to hide, but want them to asses you fairly and openly.

 

Exactly what I meant but put so much more eloquently!

 

As well as me I will have two carers present and we will be audio recording with two separate devices. There's also the CCTV camera which might accidentally get turned to point in through the window - probably the window cleaner did it, but it might not catch all of the assessment and wouldn't record any sound.

 

I have started to draft an email but we've got nearly 4 weeks before the assessment so there's no desperate rush.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have refused to budge on either issue. The same HCP will arrive sometime within the given time slot and if I am not ready will record it as a 'failed to submit'.

 

If I had a crystal ball I might be foretelling a discrimination claim against ATOS in the very near future, after this damn assessment is finally over with and possibly running in parallel with the appeal.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites

record it yourself as well as them using theirs...be on your guard ....and then go get em big time......I would love to see this lot dragged through the mud at every opportunity!!!!...........

Link to post
Share on other sites

:Hiya reallymadwoman:

 

:frusty: :frusty: :frusty:

 

Sorry. Can't think of any words that don't risk CAG being sued for libel. Although the senario's different, Tatos behaviour's so reminiscent of how they treated us. For which, my personal translation's; 'we can't cope so we'll let the Tribunals Service sort the fall out.' Unfortunately my take on Tatos won't solve your current dilemma.

 

There's no provision, that I'm aware of, for right of refusal by a claimant to be assessed by a particular pinocchio. Some attempts to avoid confrontation when there's history of complaint about a previous assessment or alleged violence but only if there's an alternative pinocchio available. Outright refusal gets referred back to a decision maker for ...... you've got it ...... whether there's good cause. In the past you've written about choosing your arguments. Should my 'clutching at straws' not help, protecting yourself against a prejudicial interview may be less stressful than another round of good cause.

 

Can't see why you have to be 'ready'. What's unreasonable about lying on the sofa, or on top of your bed under a blanket, cos it's more comfy than sitting? Also, should s/he arrive with an audio recorder you'll have a few minutes while it's set up. The two I've seen so far were mains powered (so be careful where you put your own recorder) via a transformer and seemed to need a lot of fiddling with the controls before they'd work.

 

:grouphug: Sincerely, Margaret.

Edited by **Margaret**
Link to post
Share on other sites

As I've said on my other thread

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?337937-IB-to-ESA-migration/page10

 

I have had to accept this HCP, but they have been warned (with copy to MP and DWP) but I have got the time slot reduced to 30 minutes with a mention of the Equality Act.

RMW

"If you want my parking space, please take my disability" Common car park sign in France.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Does anyone know if it is possible to refuse an assessment by a specific person, e.g. if you feel there would be a conflict of interest?

 

How about if you have had a previous dispute with the doctor where DWP have effectively accepted that the doctor was severely mistaken in their version of events - i.e. it was an out and out fabrication?

 

This may be giving away my identity if ATOS read these threads, but is it reasonable to give a 4 hour time slot where the HCP might arrive for a home assessment? This means that both myself and my carer have to be ready for the assessment to start for a very long time, it will severely disrupt our usual routine and it will completely exhaust me.

 

If you have reasonable cause to believe that this particular assessor will not assess you impartially then I would think that you would be well within your rights to request a different assessor

As DWP have agreed that the assessor did not give an "Accurate assessment" of you previously, then it is more than likely that the assessor will know that they were the subject of an appeal on the grounds of inaccuracy and unless they are an "Angel" they most certainly would find it difficult to be impartial.

 

They will flout your personal rights at every turn - in my instance they provided me with a male assessor when it had been agreed that a female assessor would be provided (I am a sexual abuse survivor and will not tolerate strange men touching or being close to me). I had to stand my ground and be very insistent when he insisted that if I refused to be assessed by him, then he would make stop the assessment and make an adverse report that would result in me having all ESA and other benefits stopped.

 

Try again and most certainly record your assessment - it is the only way to avoid the "he said, she said" scenario

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...