Jump to content

  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi dx   Post 23 letter has been hidden as has a name in it. I did read the thread and in post 7 saw mention of 'must complain within 3 years of being aware it was mis-sold' if this is what you are referring to? Also my policy is live currently.   I think you know this, but it seems the RBS/Halifax agent doesnt know, that 'I became aware it was mis-sold just before I raised my claim (2019) having read a media article'  as I dont think the PPi team showed them the original claim form maybe, who knows.   Expanding, sorry I missed the word PPi after 'loan' in my post you quoted and highlighted. To be clear, the life protector was not for a loan, but a mortgage, and that mortgage did have a mis-sold PPi on it which they have admitted and refunded.   If it helps, I have several mortgage offers here from 1999 and they say 'Minimum life cover to be assigned to the bank'    The odd thing here is, I started the mortgage and PPi in 1999 but it was 2003 this life assurance started. I do categorically recall being told it was something I had to have though.   Many thanks   E 
    • MP's are good for other things but for some reason are not very good for Council Tax.
    • I've just acknowledged the claim and im reading up on how to do the cca and cpr requests now.   Thanks for all your help  
    • forget bailiffs they can do nothing on a consumer credit debt covered by the consumer credit act. most certainly no right of forced entry nor clamping or seizing vehicles etc etc .    and it most certainly doesn't matter, even if someone did , which they didn't, contact them and said he's got money.   you've picked up some rather wild ideas on debts and CCJ's etc from some where which are totally incorrect and way off the rails of what really happens..   your next action is to goto your credit file and write down the 3 CCJ number. then on monday go ring northants bulk RECORD YOUR CALL. quote the three CCJ numbers and ask them for a copy of EACH judgement to be sent by email PDF. also ask them to either send copies of the 3 CLAIMFORMS TOO. or if they cant do that  get them to readout for each one: the address it was served too and the EXACT details of the Particulars of claim box    once you have those details comeback to this thread.   by the way who is the fleecing DCA that pulled these 3 stunts...lowell, cabot, Link, Intrum. hoist..?? who.  
  • Our picks

    • I sent in the bailiffs to the BBC. They collected £350. It made me smile.
        • Haha
        • Like
    • Hi @BankFodder
      Sorry for only updating you now, but after your guidance with submitting the claim it was pretty straight forward and I didn't want to unnecessarily waste your time. Especially with this guide you wrote here, so many thanks for that
      So I issued the claim on day 15 and they requested more time to respond.
      They took until the last day to respond and denied the claim, unsurprisingly saying my contract was with Packlink and not with them.
      I opted for mediation, and it played out very similarly to other people's experiences.
      In the first call I outlined my case, and I referred to the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 as the reason to why I do in fact have a contract with them. 
      In the second call the mediator came back with an offer of the full amount of the phone and postage £146.93, but not the court costs. I said I was not willing to accept this and the mediator came across as a bit irritated that I would not accept this and said I should be flexible. I insisted that the law was on my side and I was willing to take them to court. The mediator went back to Hermes with what I said.
      In the third call the mediator said that they would offer the full amount. However, he said that Hermes still thought that I should have taken the case against Packlink instead, and that they would try to recover the court costs themselves from Packlink.
      To be fair to them, if Packlink wasn't based in Spain I would've made the claim against them instead. But since they are overseas and the law lets me take action against Hermes directly, it's the best way of trying to recover the money.
      So this is a great win. Thank you so much for your help and all of the resources available on this site. It has helped me so much especially as someone who does not know anything about making money claims.
      Many thanks, stay safe and have a good Christmas!
        • Thanks
    • Hermes and mediation hints. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428981-hermes-and-mediation-hints/&do=findComment&comment=5080003
      • 1 reply
    • Natwest Bank Transfer Fraud Call HMRC Please help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/428951-natwest-bank-transfer-fraud-call-hmrc-please-help/&do=findComment&comment=5079786
      • 33 replies

Do I have recourse for waving tax owed

Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2855 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

On 20th Sept 2011 I recieved change of codings because I started drawing a small pension (I was already drawing another pension) and I had also changed jobs, in Feb 2013 I received a P800 saying I owed approx £3800 from year 2011-12 tax so I have been disputing this saying they had all my correct details etc etc.


They are now saying under ESC19A I have no recourse but I decided to ask for all my data as I was certain I had contacted them, on one of the forms I found that they issued change of codes on my pay main pay and my main pension on Sept 2011 which in effect caused them to under tax me ie changed pension from D0 to 65L, now I know your going to say 'but its up to you to ensure your paying the correct tax' and I would agree to a point but I then found that I had rang them 9 days later to ask them how codes were worked out and were the new codes correct, I also told them my expected total pay for that year and I overstated my pay to be on the safe side but the biggest evidence against HMRC is that the person I was speaking to stated that the codes were correct,see the statement below on their paperwork-


TP called to ask about codes and how they are worked out, took estimated income and codes correct (this is there exact wording)


The thing is since I took my main pension(2006)they have every year to date messed up my codes and I have had to pay back underpaid tax so this was the last straw.


I know they have informed me within the time limit but it is up to HMRC to issue the correct codes, If I then have reasonable belief that my codes are correct ie I did contact them and they said there were correct when in fact they were not I believe I have a case against them.Do you think I have a case here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?

  • Create New...