Jump to content
  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • Hermes lost parcel.. Read more at https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/422615-hermes-lost-parcel/
      • 49 replies
    • Oven repair. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/427690-oven-repair/&do=findComment&comment=5073391
      • 49 replies
    • I came across this discussion recently and just wanted to give my experience of A Shade Greener that may help others regarding their boiler finance agreement.
       
      We had a 10yr  finance contract for a boiler fitted July 2015.
       
      After a summer of discontent with ASG I discovered that if you have paid HALF the agreement or more you can legally return the boiler to them at no cost to yourself. I've just returned mine the feeling is liberating.
       
      It all started mid summer during lockdown when they refused to service our boiler because we didn't have a loft ladder or flooring installed despite the fact AS installed the boiler. and had previosuly serviced it without issue for 4yrs. After consulting with an independent installer I was informed that if this was the case then ASG had breached building regulations,  this was duly reported to Gas Safe to investigate and even then ASG refused to accept blame and repeatedly said it was my problem. Anyway Gas Safe found them in breach of building regs and a compromise was reached.
       
      A month later and ASG attended to service our boiler but in the process left the boiler unusuable as it kept losing pressure not to mention they had damaged the filling loop in the process which they said was my responsibilty not theres and would charge me to repair, so generous of them! Soon after reporting the fault I got a letter stating it was time we arranged a powerflush on our heating system which they make you do after 5 years even though there's nothing in the contract that states this. Coincidence?
       
      After a few heated exchanges with ASG (pardon the pun) I decided to pull the plug and cancel our agreement.
       
      The boiler was removed and replaced by a reputable installer,  and the old boiler was returned to ASG thus ending our contract with them. What's mad is I saved in excess of £1000 in the long run and got a new boiler with a brand new 12yr warranty. 
       
      You only have to look at TrustPilot to get an idea of what this company is like.
       
        • Thanks
      • 3 replies
    • Dazza a few months ago I discovered a good friend of mine who had ten debts with cards and catalogues which he was slavishly paying off at detriment to his own family quality of life, and I mean hardship, not just absence of second holidays or flat screen TV's.
       
      I wrote to all his creditors asking for supporting documents and not one could provide any material that would allow them to enforce the debt.
       
      As a result he stopped paying and they have been unable to do anything, one even admitted it was unenforceable.
       
      If circumstances have got to the point where you are finding it unmanageable you must ask yourself why you feel the need to pay.  I guarantee you that these companies have built bad debt into their business model and no one over there is losing any sleep over your debt to them!  They will see you as a victim and cash cow and they will be reluctant to discuss final offers, only ways to keep you paying with threats of court action or seizing your assets if you have any.
       
      They are not your friends and you owe them no loyalty or moral duty, that must remain only for yourself and your family.
       
      If it was me I would send them all a CCA request.   I would bet that not one will provide the correct response and you can quite legally stop paying them until such time as they do provide a response.   Even when they do you should check back here as they mostly send dodgy photo copies or generic rubbish that has no connection with your supposed debt.
       
      The money you are paying them should, as far as you are able, be put to a savings account for yourself and as a means of paying of one of these fleecers should they ever manage to get to to the point of a successful court judgement.  After six years they will not be able to start court action and that money will then become yours.
       
      They will of course pursue you for the funds and pass your file around various departments of their business and out to third parties.
       
      Your response is that you should treat it as a hobby.  I have numerous files of correspondence each faithfully organised showing the various letters from different DCA;s , solicitors etc with a mix of threats, inducements and offers.   It is like my stamp collection and I show it to anyone who is interested!
        • Thanks
        • Like

Employment Tribunal - Not innocent until proven guilty


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2734 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Please can somebody advise me?

 

Friend is going to an employment tribunal mostly to recover unpaid wages - employer obviously wants to make him look as bad as possible so he can avoid paying up and has a rather nasty solicitor working for him.

 

Former employer is alleging that friend is guilty of theft - not from former employer but from a third party ( a customer of the employer). As far as we know the customer has NOT said anything has been stolen. So friend in a letter to the tribunal requested that the employer should be required to have confirmation from the customer that these thefts actually happened if they were to be included in the tribunal. It was a long letter and this was only a small part of it.

 

Solicitor wrote back a very nasty e mail (not copied to the tribunal obviously) and said

"An employer does not have to prove by evidence that a theft has taken place, but that he reasonably believed that it had and that the employee had participated."

 

I understand that the employer does not need to have the same level of proof as a criminal court but does he not even need to prove that anything was actually stolen? It seems to me that he might as well say that because my friend went to the train station that he stole a train - no he didn't, it wouldn't fit in his pocket!

 

I realise that if the theft had been from the employer that things might be different as he would know for certain that something had gone missing but as the employer does not have any control over the customer or his activities this seems grossly unfair.

 

 

Any help or comments would be gratefully received.

 

 

Lizzy

Edited by honeybee13
Link to post
Share on other sites

How did your friend leave the employer? Were they dismissed for GMC following theft. or something else?

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He was dismissed for something unrelated and appealed. The appeal went his way but when his employer reinstated him they refused to pay his unpaid wages and changed the terms of his contract so he resigned. He went to the tribunal to get his money back.

The theft allegation was first mentioned after friend had submitted his list of documents to the employer's solicitor as per the instructions given by the tribunal.

 

Lizzy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there was no thetft dismissal then the solicitor isn't as sharp as they think they are - it's unrelated to the wages claim and very likely to be dismissed on that basis. Just scare tactics.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that.

What the solicitor is saying is that had the employer known about the alleged thefts that he would have been dismissed anyway.

 

To the best of my knowledge my friend did not commit theft.

 

Although his claim to the tribunal was primarily to get his wages back he, on the advice of the CAB, did mention that it was constructive dismissal. This was because of the unpaid wages and the changes to his contract.

 

If the judge allows them to bring in the alleged thefts will the employer be required to have confirmation that they actually happened?

 

Lizzy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had the employer known of the allged thefts they would have had to conduct a full investigation and have a hearing where your friend had the opportunity to bring witness/ union rep.

 

Didn't happen = blowing smoke.

Never assume anyone on the internet is who they say they are. Only rely on advice from insured professionals you have paid for!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be such a pain but obviously this is a huge worry for us.

All the information that the Employer is relying on was available at the time of the suspension at the start of November but not mentioned until the middle of March.

If the judge allows the allegations to be included (very persuasive solicitor v non-represented friend) will he require confirmation from the "owner of the goods" that they have been stolen? Or is the level of proof at a tribunal so low that he will just accept the employer's word?

 

Thanks

 

Lizzy

Link to post
Share on other sites

The burden of proof is "on the balance of probabilities", ie 51% or higher. If he's claiming constructive dismissal then the theft allegations will most likely be permitted as an argument - it's a defence in that a) if it was found to be a constructive dismissal, it will be fair because he contributed to it by his behaviour, or b) he would have been sacked for gross misconduct in any event once the theft was uncovered.

 

It won't affect the wages claim though, if they were backdated and there was no reason for them to be withheld.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...