Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Our price is the same all day, but varies day to day. Yes there's a risk of high prices but it has never gone above SVR any time since I signed up. Last 30 days average 17.67p/kWh, max 20.67 and lowest was 11.83.  It saved just under £300 during 2023.  
    • It you had E7 in the past but have converted to single rate then the meter will still hold the last recorded Night readings. This introduces scope for error when manually reading. If the meter has only ever been used on single rate then there's only one figure that can be taken. For example ours shows "Rate 1" reading and a "Total import" reading, but they both give the sme figure. If it has ever been on E7 the total will be higher, including the retained night reading.
    • okay, perfect and thank you so much for the help once again. so firstly i am going to initiate the breathing space, during this time it's likely ill receive a default. when i receive the default are you aware of how long it will take for me to know whether the OC have sold it off to DCAs? Once it's with the DCAs i do not need to worry as they cannot issue a CCJ only the OCs can Even if i decide to come an arrangement with the DCAs no point as the default will remain for 6 years paid or not paid I should only consider repayment if the OC still won the debt and then issue a CCJ? Just to confirm the default will not be seen after 6 years? No one can tell I had one then after 6 years ill be all good?
    • I'm not sure we were on standard tariffs - I've uploaded as many proofs as I can for the ombudsman - ovo called last night uping the compensation to 100 from 50 pounds for the slip in customer service however they won't acknowledge the the problem them not acknowledging a fault has caused nor are they willing to remedy anything as they won't accept the meter or formula was wrong.   I'd appreciate more details on the economy 7 approach and I'll update the ombudsman with any information you can share. 
    • To re-iterate and highlight my urgent question on this one: The N24 from the court did not include any instructions to submit paperwork 28 days before the date, unlike the N157 received for other smaller claims. Do I have to submit a WS for this court date? Link has!...
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

They are heavily biased. The fact that they stated that it is perfectly acceptable for a member of National Rail staff to set fire to an object, but if anyone else does so they will be arrested is proof of this. They will be dealt with appropriately

 

Might appear that way, but it's probably more the fact that the Home Office force didn't understand the Railway. The BTP probably meant that it's acceptable to burn a ticket in this way for railway staff, but a customer would be in breach of Railway Byelaw 3 if they tried it. Railway Staff are not bound by certain Byelaws if acting in the course of their duties.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OP is removing All there posts now,that tells you something !

 

Ahh well, no one can be faulted for trying to help him as far as I can see.

 

And if it's by magic,most of the OP post re-appear !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

yep

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last thing I'm going to say on this matter as using this website about rail problems is completely pointless when too many people here work for the company and seem to have a protect their own mentality. The way you get spoken to around here just for wanting justice against members of National Rail staff, who aren't above the law, is disgusting.

 

I spoke to the station manager, and as all the rail employees that posted in this thread full well know, the RPO was completely in the wrong and I did nothing wrong. Snatching the ticket was perhaps the wrong thing to do, but apparently reasonable given the circumstances. You guys aren't as powerful as you like to think.

 

This isn't the first time the RPO has behaved out of line, so my complaint will be taken seriously. My photocard and tickets have been returned to me. The RPO has even decided to burn some of the tickets that were within my wallet. There was no need for him to have done this at all.

 

As the CCTV footage proves my story, you can either choose to believe that this incident took place as described, or continue to disbelieve me. If you want to believe that I set up a studio replicating the station's ticket office, hired actors resembling the staff, staged the entire incident and then hacked their system to replace the original CCTV footage with this, then that's your decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last thing I'm going to say on this matter as using this website about rail problems is completely pointless when too many people here work for the company and seem to have a protect their own mentality. The way you get spoken to around here just for wanting justice against members of National Rail staff, who aren't above the law, is disgusting.

 

I spoke to the station manager, and as all the rail employees that posted in this thread full well know, the RPO was completely in the wrong and I did nothing wrong. Snatching the ticket was perhaps the wrong thing to do, but apparently reasonable given the circumstances. You guys aren't as powerful as you like to think.

 

This isn't the first time the RPO has behaved out of line, so my complaint will be taken seriously. My photocard and tickets have been returned to me. The RPO has even decided to burn some of the tickets that were within my wallet. There was no need for him to have done this at all.

 

As the CCTV footage proves my story, you can either choose to believe that this incident took place as described, or continue to disbelieve me. If you want to believe that I set up a studio replicating the station's ticket office, hired actors resembling the staff, staged the entire incident and then hacked their system to replace the original CCTV footage with this, then that's your decision.

 

Your correct ...

 

Don't believe anything you posted especially after trying to delete All your posts in this thread,then re posting them....

 

Bye ...:whoo:

Please use the quote system, So everyone will know what your referring too, thank you ...

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last thing I'm going to say on this matter as using this website about rail problems is completely pointless when too many people here work for the company and seem to have a protect their own mentality. The way you get spoken to around here just for wanting justice against members of National Rail staff, who aren't above the law, is disgusting.

 

I spoke to the station manager, and as all the rail employees that posted in this thread full well know, the RPO was completely in the wrong and I did nothing wrong. Snatching the ticket was perhaps the wrong thing to do, but apparently reasonable given the circumstances. You guys aren't as powerful as you like to think.

 

This isn't the first time the RPO has behaved out of line, so my complaint will be taken seriously. My photocard and tickets have been returned to me. The RPO has even decided to burn some of the tickets that were within my wallet. There was no need for him to have done this at all.

 

As the CCTV footage proves my story, you can either choose to believe that this incident took place as described, or continue to disbelieve me. If you want to believe that I set up a studio replicating the station's ticket office, hired actors resembling the staff, staged the entire incident and then hacked their system to replace the original CCTV footage with this, then that's your decision.

Out of curiosity, what station did this take place at? I see you've chosen to ignore my previous post.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Last thing I'm going to say on this matter as using this website about rail problems is completely pointless when too many people here work for the company and seem to have a protect their own mentality. The way you get spoken to around here just for wanting justice against members of National Rail staff, who aren't above the law, is disgusting.

 

I spoke to the station manager, and as all the rail employees that posted in this thread full well know, the RPO was completely in the wrong and I did nothing wrong. Snatching the ticket was perhaps the wrong thing to do, but apparently reasonable given the circumstances. You guys aren't as powerful as you like to think.

 

This isn't the first time the RPO has behaved out of line, so my complaint will be taken seriously. My photocard and tickets have been returned to me. The RPO has even decided to burn some of the tickets that were within my wallet. There was no need for him to have done this at all.

 

As the CCTV footage proves my story, you can either choose to believe that this incident took place as described, or continue to disbelieve me. If you want to believe that I set up a studio replicating the station's ticket office, hired actors resembling the staff, staged the entire incident and then hacked their system to replace the original CCTV footage with this, then that's your decision.

 

 

What a sad dream world you must live in. Neither rail staff, or the travelling public are above the law.

 

There is NO EVIDENCE in your posts of wrong doing, just your opinion, to which you are of course entitled. If there was evidence I am sure that Police would have been more interested.

 

Perhaps you should bear in mind that Rail Companies revenue protection & prosecution staff do talk to each other too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Out of curiosity, what station did this take place at? I see you've chosen to ignore my previous post.

 

It's been asked a few times Stigy, but it seems that the OP is never going to reveal the truth of the matter voluntarily

Link to post
Share on other sites

going by a past thread

 

ey

 

is his local one

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is being closed now as it is serving no purpose.

 

Just wanted to thank the contributors who have responded to this story.

 

Thread closed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4008 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...