Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How does one obtain the permit? The permit team number is only open between the hours of 9am to 3pm Mon - Fri. It says on the website, To obtain an additional 2 hours, the driver must pay a tariff of £3.00 + booking fees in person at our Security Hut, is that how you get the permit also, from the security hut? What a rigmaroll that would be but maybe just another step to take to try and catch people out?
    • Anotheruser0000 bear in mind that not all Judges are equally versed in the PoFA regulations. Fortunately now most of them are but sometimes a Judge from a higher Court sits in who is well experienced  in Law but not PoFA. and so they sometimes go "offkey" because their knowledge can raise a different set of arguments and solutions. It does seem particularly unfair  when the decision is so  bad . it can also be that in some situations the motorist being a lay person is not sufficiently know ledgeable to be able to counter a Judge's decisions in a way that a barrister could.
    • The argument about the date of receipt is now dead because the PCN  does not comply with the wording  of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  First reason Section 9 [2] [e]  "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper—(i)to pay the unpaid parking charges;" Second Reason Section 9 [2][a] "specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of parking to which the notice relates;" All your PCN does is mark the time you entered and left the car park. It does not include all the myriad things you do in between-driving into the car park, looking for a parking space-perhaps a disabled space or  parent and Child place@ getting the children or disabled person out of the car then going shopping. Coming back; loading the car with shopping [, getting the children or disabled into the car, taking the trolley back to the store; driving to the exit perhaps stopping to let vehicles/pedestrians cross in front of you etc. so subtracting the driving times from before and after parking can make quite a difference from their time to the actual period parking time. So the upshot is now that only the driver is responsible for paying the PCN and the keeper is not liable at all even if the name of the driver is never known by Nexus so well done for not appealing. You obviously want to keep it that way to make it very difficult for them to win in Court if it ever goes that far. Although your question is now moot since  the same objective has been achieved by the non compliant PCN [ie no keeper liability] just  about the only way to dispute the timing of the PCN would be if one kept the envelope and there was a discernible date stamp on it that did not match the date on the PCN. There is a new Act coming out [and it cannot come quickly enough ] and one of the things required is that parking companies will have to prove the date of sending out their PCNs. We are not the only ones who sometimes doubt the veracity of their dates particularly as the later it is sent [unlawfully] the shorter the period motorists have to benefit [?] from the reduced payment. I haven't seen it on your posts but do you know how long you are permitted to park for free?
    • I was so annoyed and frustrated about the fact this case was lost it's been floating around my head all night. Dave962, are you sure that's what the Judge said? .... It doesn't make sense. Did the judge in fact dismiss the case on the grounds that the defendant did not make an appeal within 28 days? Effectively telling the PPC about the error entering the registration number and providing proof of payment at that time? To me, that's an important point.  
    • The United Autoworkers Union took a risk in a Republican - and often anti-union - part of the US.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3989 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I'm new here so fingers-crossed that this is in the correct forum.

 

Until around 3 weeks ago I had a former friend lodging at my home. He was only here, on & off, for around 6 weeks, I had to throw him out because he caused substantial damage to my home and neither arranged to have the damage made good, paid for it to be done or even apologised (& I'm talking about what will in total be over 1,000).

 

I've since received a number of items of post addressed to him. Today when I got home another one had been delievered except I didn't notice it was for him until after opening it.

 

It's a letter from Marston:

 

"We are in posession of a Magistrates Court Order as a consequence of non-payment of the above amount. We are instructed to demand immediate payment in FULL from you. We must inform you that unless the TOTAL sum due is paid into our office within 7 days of the date of this letter, our bailiffs will attend to levy distress and remove your goods for sale by PUBLIC AUCTION. This action will involve minimum further costs of 215."

 

It was seemingly non-payment of a 35 fine for 'A*****t by b*****g' + 85 fees.

 

Not wanting something like this to be recorded against my address I called Marstons, it was a -long- process just to speak to someone. The first time, after being on hold for ages the line was answered, as I started speaking it went dead. I called back, more time on hold. This time I was able to start explaining the situation but after a few moments the line died again. In case it was a problem with the landline at home I tried from my mobile. More time on hold & yep, same problem after speaking for a few moments. On the 4th attempt, having speant over an hour on hold I eventually got to speak to someone properly.

 

I explained the situation and explained that because the addressee left under far-from-favourable circumstances, that he did not provide a forwarding address but that I had subsequently discovered where he was working, I offered this information but it was refused with no explanation beyond "I need a residental address". I said I thought it was ludicrous that they were being offered information which would enable them to find the person they're trying to contact but were refusing it. I then specifically asked for my address to be removed from the persons record.

 

I was told that I would have to send them a utility bill in my name. I asked what that would acheive, given that it neither prooves I actually live at the address or that the person they are chasing does not. I received no sufficient answer to this, only mumbling about bailliffs visting. I asked again both what sending a utility bill would acheive and also why I should have to do anything given that I'm not the person they're chasing (this being particularly annoying when I've already offered contact details (which they could verify with a single call) and when they could verify my residency here on the electoral roll). When I didn't get a sufficient reply again I asked to be transferred to his duty manager and I was asked why he should!! I said that I wanted to speak to someone in authority there and the reply was "I'm in authority, I'm a senior member of staff" so I pointed out that if he was "a senior member of staff" that he wouldn't be taking first-line calls. I then asked again to be transferred to his duty manager and he refused. I asked for him name, given the fact that he had a strong accent, because he was obviously very agitated and because I wanted to be sure I asked him to repeat and the response was (shouted) "A-L-F-I-E, did you get that, was it simple enough for you?". Given his appalling attitude I hung up.

 

So........... as I'm not an expert in these matters what should I do next? I have no wish to avoid either Marstons or my former lodger running up expenses and charges etc, that bit doesnt bother me in the slightest. However, I dont want any of this to be recorded against my address. Can I force the removal of my address? How on earth can I proove someone -doesn't- live here? Should I have to proove anything? Can Marstons send someone to my home to seize property? Can they force access to do so? Everything here is mine, there is nothing here that belongs to the former lodger.

 

Many thanks in advance!

Richard

Edited by RJPotts
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Richard welcome to CAG

 

Well 1st of all they are in breach of the DPA for disclosing the details without checking the person is who it was meant to be, and if therefore you are not the person involved just simply call the police and ask for them to attend to "prevent a breach of the peace" it's the their duty.

 

Provide your details and simply state that the person they are trying to enforce no longer lives at this address, and to return the warrant to court for reissue to correct address, IMHO also a call to the court service stating that the person no longer lives there, and if your bailiffs return I will sue for tort of trespass and harassment and that should be the end of it, but..... if they levy on any of your property then try to take it, they commit the act of theft,

 

You may want to edit your post to take out the nature of the offence because you are not the person concerned and is not relevant to this and you may get yourself in to bother if your old lodger finds out

 

Also outstanding debt from court is attached to the to the named persons credit file not you or your home also the bailiffs don't like being filmed either so worth having a video of the confrontation you may have, ask to see the Bailiffs ID card and keep the details safe if it indeed turns ugly you have a name to start with....

Edited by mikeymack2002
  • Haha 1

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the message.

 

I dont believe they have breached the DPA as they didn't disclose any information on the phone. The information I have is from the letter.

 

I dont see any value on speaking to Marston on the phone again. The attitude from the guy I spoke to was truly shocking.

 

I guess it may well be useful speaking to the court service and seeing how they can help. The only slight problem there is that the contact details on the HM Courts & Tribunals Service website, unless you're using a textphone, are on a court-by-court basis and I have no idea which court dealt with the matter. What I do have though is the HMC&TS reference number. Does anyone know if there's a way of finding out which court it was? If not I suppose it may be worth phoning the most local one and seeing if they can look the reference number up.

 

I was under the impression that credit searches etc will often show list other people who have been resident at the address?

 

By chance there's a (tiny, part-time) police station a few hundred yards from my home so yes, should a bailiff come knocking I'll ask him to wait outside and then call the police.

 

Best regards

Richard

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have flagged your thread for one of the Site team who knows about these things. It is probably best that you don't speak to them on the telephone again.. but then you have almost certainly come to that conclusion yourself !

 

Someone will be with you soon as they can :)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Get to the nearest solicitors, send them a stat dec that everything in the house is yours ( create an inventory of goods to make it easier), send it to the bailiffs and tell them to bog off.

 

You will also need to call or write to the courts, explain what has happened, and send in the stat dec. They will probably want you to go to the court and sign something there too.

 

It is pretty easy to show he isnt there. You just need to do the legal documents to prove it.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi both,

 

Thanks for your messages.

 

You're quite right CitizenB. I have no wish to speak to them again!

 

Hi Renegadeimp, By chance (via scanning messages on here), I've just been reading about stat decs. It is indeed true that everything here is mine, the few things that he left included nothing of value so it all went in the bin. Am I correct though in reading between the lines that a stat dec is for a limited period? Is it correct that I can obtain one at a court free as opposed to charged at a solicitor? Does it then need to be submitted to the court, to Marstons, or to both?

 

I'll be phoning the local court on Monday (i've already emailed also) to seek their advice. You mentioned it being pretty easy to show he isn't here. Barring showing someone the now empty spare bedroom how do I do so though?

 

Best regards and again, many thanks!

Richard

Link to post
Share on other sites

A stat dec is a legal document that declares that everything in the house is yours and the named person does not reside there. You can also go to the court and do it there. It is legally binding as if you sign a stat dec at a court and you are found to have lied, you will be found in contempt of court and be punished as such.

 

GO to the court, take as much proof as possible and get the documents signed. You also need to go to a sol and get a stat dec done and send it to the bailiffs. The court might not even need the stat dec as long as you provide enough proof and sign the right forms.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

You state that you have an HMCTS reference. Does the letter state which court or any details. For example, does it state HMCTS London, Kent, Liverpool etc.?

 

It is important to put something in writing to the Court and copy it to Marston Group

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have looked around and have found the snippet from a list if you are not the debtor then the levy is invalid the bailiff cannot take anything of yours if you are not the debtor

 

 

Invalid levy

 

This is a edited list of grounds a levy could be invalid and the distress is irregular,

 

Edited by mikeymack2002

If I have been of any help, please click on my star and leave a note to let me know, thank you.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...