Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. Could you post up what they've sent please so we can see what the charge is? Cover up your name and address and their reference number. HB
    • I've looked through all our old NPE threads, and as far as we know they have never had the bottle to do court. There are no guarantees of course, but when it comes to put or shut up they definitely tend towards shut up. How about something like -   Dear Jonathan and Julie, Re: PCN no.XXXXX cheers for your Letter Before Claim.  I rolled around on the floor in laughter at the idea that you actually expected me to take this tripe seriously and cough up. I'll write to you not some uninterested third party, thanks all the same, because you have are the ones trying to threaten me about this non-existent "debt". Go and look up Jopson v Homeguard Services Ltd, saddos.  Oh, while you're at it, go and look up your Subject Access Request obligations - we all know how you ballsed that up way back in January to March. Dear, dear, dear - you couldn't resist adding your £70 Unicorn Food Tax, you greedy gets.  Judges don't like these made-up charges, do they? You can either drop this foolishness now or get a hell of a hammering in court.  Both are fine with me.  Summer is coming up and I would love a holiday at your expense after claiming an unreasonable costs order under CPR 27.14(2)(g). I look forward to your deafening silence.   That should show them you're not afraid of them and draw their attention to their having legal problems of their own with the SAR.  If they have any sense they'll crawl back under their stone and leave you in peace.  Over the next couple of days invest in a 2nd class stamp (all they are worth) and get a free Certificate of Posting from the post office.
    • Yes that looks fine. It is to the point. I think somewhere in the that the you might want to point out that your parcel had been delivered but clearly had been opened and resealed and the contents had been stolen
    • Hi All, I just got in from work and received a letter dated 24 April 2024. "We've sent you a Single Justice Procedure notice because you have been charged with an offence, on the Transport for London Network." "You need to tell us whether you are guilty or not guilty. This is called making your plea."
    • Okay please go through the disclosure very carefully. I suggest that you use the technique broadly in line with the advice we give on preparing your court bundle. You want to know what is there – but also very importantly you want to know what is not there. For instance, the email that they said they sent you before responding to the SAR – did you see that? Is there any trace of of the phone call that you made to the woman who didn't know anything about SAR's? On what basis was the £50 sent to you? Was it unilateral or did they offer it and you accepted it on some condition? When did they send you this £50 cheque? Have you banked it? Also, I think that we need to start understanding what you have lost here. Have you lost any money – and if so how much? Send the SAR to your bank as advised above
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Have a local authority parking ticket


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4015 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received a local authority parking ticket, I had purchased the correct ticket and put it on my dash (there is no adhesive on the tickets in my area) but it had blown off when I shut the door. I appealed and sent a letter with the paid ticket as evidence, their response was a ten page letter with pictures of my car, quoting bylaw blah and blah - basically they said because it was not displayed the fine stood. I responded with a letter of dispute but paid the £25 fine as I knew they would find a way of further penalizing me! Guess what, I received my cheque back today saying that they had received it after the 14 days(I don't have proof of postage) and now it is £50!! I am really aggrieved, what is likely to happen if I tell them I am not paying and they can take me to court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not need to take you to Court as you have already been issued with the 'fine' by way of the penalty charge. All that will happen if you don't pay is a couple more official forms we arrive in the post and then it will be passed to the baliffs who will chase you for the money owed plus a fee for their services. Since the cost has already gone up you may as well appeal to the independant adjudicator.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not need to take you to Court as you have already been issued with the 'fine' by way of the penalty charge. All that will happen if you don't pay is a couple more official forms we arrive in the post and then it will be passed to the baliffs who will chase you for the money owed plus a fee for their services. Since the cost has already gone up you may as well appeal to the independant adjudicator.

 

 

what do you mean they dont need to go to court. what does TEC do in northampton bulking centre

:???: what me. never heard of you never had a debt with you.
Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean they dont need to go to court. what does TEC do in northampton bulking centre

 

The keeper is already liable for the penalty charge regardless of any goings on at the TEC, if you can tell me of a single PCN that the TEC has been asked to register as a debt and then refused please let us know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what do you mean they dont need to go to court. what does TEC do in northampton bulking centre

 

TEC rubber stamps the automated enforcement process. No one "goes to court". The enforcement process is already in place, and it allows them to come and seize your property, most likely the car itself.

 

A better line for you to take would be a courteous letter apologising for the late payment, and saying you definitely posted it on time, and will they please check the postmark on the envelope. That is far more likely to get you a cancellation that just refusing to budge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The appeal text below has had some success where a person is able to send a copy of the P&D ticket with the appeal. YOu can give it a go at the next stage if you think it appropriate

 

Dear Sirs

 

I would like to appeal the penalty charge served upon me.

 

Enclosed is a copy of the Pay & Display ticket that I purchased and displayed for inspection. It can clearly be seen that I paid the appropriate fee and that the ticket was valid when the officer inspected my vehicle. Unfortunately, at some point during my absence from the vehicle, the ticket somehow became dislodged from where it had been clearly displayed and fell into the foot well. I accept that your officer could not have known this and acted accordingly.

 

However, now that the ticket has been presented for inspection it is clear that I did not avoid payment of the parking fee or that I had parked beyond time paid for. The only purpose a ticket needs to be displayed is to enable an officer to distinguish between those that have paid for parking and those that have not and those who have exceeded the time paid for. The ticket produced clearly shows that had your officer seen my ticket at the time of inspection that there would be no need to serve a penalty charge notice.

 

The only remaining issue is whether the fact that the ticket was not clearly displayed at the time of inspection warrants the council taking a hard line and upholding the penalty charge. I believe that for the council to take such a stance would be contrary to the advice of the DfT and the Secretary of State.

 

Paragraph 85 from the Secretary of State’s Statutory Guidance to Local Authorities advises;

 

85. An authority has a discretionary power to cancel a PCN at any point

throughout the CPE process. It can do this even when an undoubted

contravention has occurred if the authority deems it to be appropriate in the

circumstances of the case. Under general principles of public law, authorities

have a duty to act fairly and proportionately and are encouraged to exercise

discretion sensibly and reasonably and with due regard to the public interest

 

This statutory guidance is given legal authority by section 87 of the Traffic Management Act 2004 whereby statute instructs that the council must have regard to this guidance. Any failure to have regard to this guidance is a procedural impropriety as defined by regulation 4(5) of the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England)Representations and Appeals Regulations 2007;

 

4(5) In these Regulations “procedural impropriety” means afailure by the enforcement authority to observe any requirement imposed on itby the 2004 Act, by the General Regulations or by these Regulations inrelation to the imposition or recovery of a penalty charge or other sum andincludes in particular

 

As a valid ticket has been presented for inspection it is clear to any reasonable person that it would not be in the public interest to penalise a person who paid the required fee and did nothing to the detriment of the public interest. I cannot think of a more appropriate situation where paragraph 85 applies than this. I therefore politely request that the council act fairly and proportionately in this matter and exercise their discretion sensibly and reasonably by cancelling this penalty charge. It would be best for all if we can resolve this without the need to seek independent adjudication.

 

Yours with love, hugs and kisses

Edited by TheBogsDollocks
Link to post
Share on other sites

The keeper is already liable for the penalty charge regardless of any goings on at the TEC, if you can tell me of a single PCN that the TEC has been asked to register as a debt and then refused please let us know?

 

Actually TEC is quite strict when it comes to registering debt and if a council does not provide all the required information in the required formats then TEC will reject the application to register the debt. TEC turn down applications everyday for discrepencies in the paperwork/datafiles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually TEC is quite strict when it comes to registering debt and if a council does not provide all the required information in the required formats then TEC will reject the application to register the debt. TEC turn down applications everyday for discrepencies in the paperwork/datafiles.

 

Maybe she should wait until it goes to Court then?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe she should wait until it goes to Court then?

 

No need to be facetious. You wanted to know about penalty charge debts that TEC had refused to register and there are hundreds if not thousands every day. If I recall correctly, if 3 records or more are incorrect then TEC reject the whole batch and a batch can contain hundreds of debt applications. The council will then either drop the matter or go through the batch and correct any errors so that they can re-submit the batch.

 

If the truth be told, it is those that fail to register with DVLA or who give DVLA incorrect information that will never have to worry about paying a PCN or the likelihood of bailiffs calling. As usual it is the honest and diligent that are lambs to the slaughter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received a local authority parking ticket, I had purchased the correct ticket and put it on my dash (there is no adhesive on the tickets in my area) but it had blown off when I shut the door. I appealed and sent a letter with the paid ticket as evidence.......

 

How much was the ticket when you purchased it ?

Has the Council acknowledged receipt of the ticket in the correspondence you have received from them ?

Did you take a scan for your own records before sending it off ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...