Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • i hope Yasmeen Couser is going to be at this hearing else their WS is totally inadmissible.   dx  
    • Government launches call for evidence on video game loot boxes     READ MORE HERE: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-launches-call-for-evidence-on-video-game-loot-boxes
    • They can still write to you after the 14 day limit but they can only pursue the driver as they have lost the ability to chase the keeper.   I hope that you have not divulged who was driving. Never talk to these guys on the phone. They lie and harass as well as taping conversations.   Only write and do not appeal as they never agree that the motorist is right.   Please reply to the questions on post 2 so we can give you the best advice to avoid paying these crooks.
    • Hi   I think you also need to send this company a Subject Access Request (SAR) simply asking for 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whichever format they hold it in whether it be written, email phone recording etc.   They then have 30 Calendar day to respond only once they have acknowledged receipt of your SAR request. note a SAR if now Free   As for them stating they don't have to stop processing your data they need to comply with the General Data Protection Regulations 2018 (GDPR) which is now part of Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA)   This link breaks down the GDPR so its easier to understand your rights:  https://www.privacy-regulation.eu/en/index.htm    
    • There is so much wrong with their WS.   You stopped for a very short time yet she seems to equate that as being parked! That flies in the face of what parking means.   There have been several cases in Court where Judges have defined the meaning of parked. Not one of them describes it as stopping for a few minutes with the engine running and the driver remaining in the vehicle. And why on earth is POFA being included on s28? The airport comes under Byelaws and that land is specifically not covered by POFA.   Then on s30 she cites Parking Eye v Beavis talking about establishing a contract between the parking company and the motorist to park!   then from s33 to s40 they are trying to bamboozle the Court by trying to minimise the effect of the Byelaws. It is the borough of Southend on Sea that decides the rules there- https://d1z15fh6odiy9s.cloudfront.net/files/sen-byelaws-1983-297c76b8.   S12 and s13 confirm that the signs erected by the Council are the ones to be observed.   You can also use the Forum search box and cases that have been won against VCS above.   s46 The claimant submits the signs are not prohibitive!    The dictionary description of" Prohibitive"- (of a law or rule) forbidding or restricting something.  If it looks like a duck and walks like a duck...Is she dumb or what. s47 Further misdirection-this is nothing to do with parking s48 refers to the" lawful occupier" not the landowner which is Southend Council.  I end up going back to s5 which gives the impression that VCS complies totally with their Code of Practice and therefore you, the motorist must be guilty. yet Time and time again VCS loses in Court because they have not complied with their CoP.   The Parking Prankster indicates some of them.  http://parking-prankster.blogspot.com/2017/02/   and in the case below they took someone to Court knowing that they did not have the right to take this person to Court at all. http://nebula.wsimg.com/e3da92cb966c72de63ec1f98605c2954?AccessKeyId=4CB8F2392A09CF228A46&disposition=0&alloworigin=1   VCS v Ms O C8DP9D8C Birmingham 1/8/2017 this was taking a motorist to Court  when the contract for the car park was down to Excel. VCS have lost many cases in Court knowing that they did not have the right to sue as there was no contract between them and motorists-total breach of their CoP and should have put their ability to access motorists data  were it not for the weakness of DVLA and the IPC. VCS v Ms M. 3QZ53955 25/01/2016 Claim discontinued. Costs awarded to motorist. as above-masquerading as Excel yet again.
  • Our picks

    • @curryspcworld @TeamKnowhowUK - Samsung 75 8K TV - completely broken by Currys. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426151-samsung-75-8k-tv-completely-broken-by-currys/&do=findComment&comment=5069075
      • 4 replies
    • @skinnyfoodco Skinny Foods. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/426130-skinny-foods/&do=findComment&comment=5068996
      • 8 replies
    • I’m in desperate need of help
       
      I bought some clothes online in may through Evans and paid through PayPal
      returned them all seven days later
       
      I waited the 14days for my refund and no refund came
      I put in a dispute through PayPal but I didn’t get any emails to escalate the case - PayPal closed it. 
      evans said they couldn’t refund the money because PayPal have cancelled the refund because of the open dispute
       
      I contacted PayPal
      they said the dispute had been closed but Evans at no point had attempted a refund.
      fast forward to today
       
      I’ve got copies of numerous messages sent to and from twitter messages as it’s the only way I can contact them
      I’ve also contacted their customer service too
      all I get is PayPal have cancelled refund because dispute is still open.
       
      I have proved that the dispute is closed
      I have got an email saying that if Evans sent the refund they would accept it
      but up until the date I got the email they have not once attempted a refund .
       
       I have sent them a letter before court email
      I have even offered to have the full refund as a gift card just to get this sorted !
       
      I’m literally at the end of my tether and don’t know where to turn next !
       
      i suffer with mental health issues and this is affecting my health and I’d saved the money for a year to buy these clothes as I’m on a low income .
    • In desperate need of help. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/425244-in-desperate-need-of-help/&do=findComment&comment=5067040
      • 29 replies

Travis Perkins Personal Guarantee Problem


Please note that this topic has not had any new posts for the last 2190 days.

If you are trying to post a different story then you should start your own new thread. Posting on this thread is likely to mean that you won't get the help and advice that you need.

If you are trying to post information which is relevant to the story in this thread then please flag it up to the site team and they will allow you to post.

Thank you

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My company was wound up last year and as director I am now being chased for a debt of roughly £20k from Travis Perkins, based on me having signed what they purport to be a personal guarantee.

 

 

When they wrote to chase the debt initially I offered them £3500 settlement which they declined.

 

 

They then issued a Statutory Demand which I had set aside based on the arguement that I did not agree I had signed a personal guarantee.

Travis Perkins agreed to have the SD set aside as it had raised a trialable issue.

 

 

They then wote saying they would take our offer of £3500 in full and final settlement.

We said that we were no longer able to uphold this offer as

 

 

1. did not have the funds and

2. did not agree personal liability for the debt.

All then went quiet for 6 months.

 

 

Then we got a county court claim letter to which we responded by defending our case,

saying

1. I was not aware I had signed a personal guarantee

2. Nowhere on the guarantee part of the form was the word 'personal' used.

3. I signed in capacity of director and underlined the word 'Director' to show this.

 

 

I also contacted Travis perkins will a new settlement offer of £1200 to which I have not had a response.

 

 

I then received a 'Notice of proposed allocation to the Multi-track' which includes a questionnaire to complete.

It also states that proposed directions need to be filed but I am assuming this is by the claimant?

 

 

I know there have been others who have been caught out by these Travis Perkins personal guarantees and wonder has anyone got to where we are or even challanged the personal guarantee in court?

 

 

Any experiences or advise would be very much appreciated.

 

 

Thank you for your time.

 

I should have added that the following text is on the form, entitled 'Credit Guarantee':

 

Credit Guarantee - To be signed by the owner / director / company secretary of the company applying for credit

in consideration of your agreement to supply goods to the applicant company on credit, we the undersigned being owner / directors of the company jointly and severally guarantee payment of all financial obligations to ************ Company and its subsidiaries and successors including financial obligations arising from any increase in credit limit granted by ********** company or its subsidiaries and successors from time to time following review of the applicant company's account.

 

I Signed and dated this and also underlined the word 'Director' in the title.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, even though you signed this as a "Director", I think the intention of the document is clear. The wording states that you are guaranteeing the obligations of the company. I cannot think of any other sensible explanation, your Defence is basically arguing that you signed a guarantee on behalf of the company for the company to guarantee its own obligations. With respect this explanation does not make sense. I think it will be very difficult to challenge this if they have a signed document.

 

It is the Claimant's responsibility to file proposed directions. In the multi-track you will be ordered to pay the Claimant's legal costs if you lose, if this goes all the way to trial you could easily be looking at an extra 5k-10k added onto the debt.

 

Unless there is something I am missing I think you should go back and try to settle this for £3500 immediately, before more legal costs are incurred. £3500 would be a very favourable settlement. Even if you cannot afford the full amount straight away, you are much better off negotiating monthly payments on a £3500 CCJ than a £2500+ plus CCJ. Sorry I don't have anything more positive to say.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks for your quick reply steampowered. I agree that we would be more likely to lose should the matter be tested in court. I am hoping that they would be reluctant to test this as if they lost this could in theory open a can of worms with regards to their past enforcements of personal guarantees?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, it would not affect past enforcement.

 

It could affect future enforcement if the document were found to be invalid in all circumstances, not just on the specific circumstances of your case, but I think this is pretty unlikely (and probably unlikely that the case would get publicly reported unless it is appealed).

 

The more important reason why they won't want to go all the way is that they will have to pay legal costs to do it, and they know there is no certainty you will repay the money. One strategy is to tell them £3500 is the maximum you can pay otherwise you will have to declare bankruptcy (there is no obligation to follow through on statements like that).

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks steampowered. I have noticed that TP have recently changed their trade application form and entitled the guarantee section 'Personal credit guarantee' followed by the text below. They seem to have changed it to make the 'personal' part far clearer than on the form I signed.

 

In consideration of your agreement to supply goods on credit to the Company described above applying for credit herein (‘the Company’ ) I/we the undersigned being director(s)/member(s) of the Company/LLP hereby

unconditionally and personally, jointly and severally guarantee payment of all monies due and owing by the Company to .... Trading Company Limited, its subsidiaries and successors, including all monies

due and owing by reason of any increases in the credit limit granted by ....Trading Company Limited from time to time following review of the Company's credit account and note the additional terms below.

 

Do you know if there's any way I could check for similar court cases please- I don't know if these are made public or not? Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can search for reported cases on www.bailli.org. There are a number of cases on there involving Travis Perkins but I haven't looked through them. Most cases never get reported so this is not necessarily every case they have ever been involved with.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A judgement in the County Court wouldn't be binding on other County Court cases.

 

Only if a County Court judgement was appealed to a higher court would the higher court's judgement be able to be cited as binding case law.

 

None the less, if you feel you will likely lose any County Court case, you may be better to settle for a lower "full & final" settlement, unless you wish to go down the Insolvency route.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting : would the fact that they have changed it be ammunition to demonstrate that it wasn't previously clear that it was a personal guarantee?

 

However, I agree that it seems obvious that it was a personal guarantee as a "non-personal" guarantee wouldn't be any guarantee at all. ........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for the link steampowered. I have had a look but the cases listed are not related to personal guarantees.

 

Thank you BazzaS for your reply. Like you say, it would be interesting to know if the fact they changed the form would make a difference.

 

It does seem that we are probably best to try and settle for a low amount now rather than take the chance that TP won't take it to court.

 

Do you think they would still accept the £3500 as they were prepared to earlier or do you think they will now push for more as they have started the county court claim?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Difficult to say. You are still in the early stages of litigation so they might do. They might try to ask for £3500 plus legal costs to date, but I doubt there are many costs yet.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, thank you steampowered. I think I will wait a while and see if TP come back to us regarding our offer, given that they will now have received a copy of our defense. If I don't hear anything by a week or so I think I will write again to increase the offer.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...

Hi,

 

Yes, we finally managed to get it resolved. There was a lot of toing and froing as we wanted to settle rather than let it go to court. We ended up reaching a settlement figure that we could just about afford which was about a third of the amount owed by the company. I hope that helps and good luck with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 11 months later...

My depressing contribution is that I have just lost a county court hearing against TP in which one of my lines of defence was that the guarantee was not personal. The judge agreed with them that it was personal.

 

I think they should have made it much clearer in the guarantee wording. Clearly the new form is an improvement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to the correct forum.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group The National Consumer Service

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    No registered users viewing this page.


  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...