Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help - PPI insurance certificates


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3976 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, I am new to this so hopefully i'm posting this in the correct place.

 

I have / had several loans dating back to the 1990's to present , all except the last two (which are still running) included PPI and each loan paid off the previous one. I cannot remember ever remember receiving insurance certificates from Barclays on the loans taken out back in the 1990 to around 2005.

 

Is this normal for the bank not to issue a certificate?

Link to post
Share on other sites

welcome aboard.

 

yes.

 

have you sar'd them and got all the details yet.

 

have you got the agreements par chance?

 

you might also find link 1 below useful.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

 

i have SAR'd Barclays and just waiting for the details to come through.

 

I have a couple of the agreements which show that PPI was front loaded,

i am hoping Barclays will be able to supply the ones i am missing.

 

Until i started to read this website i did not know that the premium was paid up front

and interest was also added onto the PPI.

 

They never asked whether i had any other cover or whether i had a sickness package with work (which i have).

 

Like i mentioned i have only received insurance certificate for the two loans taken out around about 2006,

all other loans before this date i never saw any insurance certificates.

 

Even when i consolidated two of the loans to reduce my monthly payments, they still went ahead and included PPI.

Link to post
Share on other sites

well I hope you get everything

 

as you'll be in for one mighty windfall

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok i've now received some of the documents from Barclays (not all of them but this could be because they are over 6 years old).

 

One loan -2006 to 2011 with PPI (claim made for 2 or 3 months) then paid off with loan 2 in 2011 with no PPI and still running

 

One stand alone loan with PPI 2004-2005 (Loan closed)

 

Five loans

- all paid off with each new loan (Loan 1 1993-1995 with PPI) paid off with

Loan 2 (1995-1999 with PPI) paid off with

loan 3 (1999-2000 with PPI) paid off with

loan 4 (2000-2004 NO PPI) paid off with

loan 5 (2003-2011 with PPI)

 

Loan 5 claim made for 2 or 3 months).

 

From what i can tell from the paperwork that was sent through

Loan 2 was consolidated but no paperwork for the loan in 1993

 

i don't no whether this was loan 1 consolidated with another that was taken out prior to 1993.

 

Barclays loan statement only shows loans rolling over 4 times,

however load 5 paid off loan 4 after a month of loan 5 being taken out, this is obviously why they haven't shown loan 5 as attached to loan 4.

 

Can someone please tell me whether i should send three seperate claims in

(2 loans / stand alone & 5 loans)

within a few days of each other or send them all in together but seperate questionaires?

Link to post
Share on other sites

one questionnaire

 

one spreadsheet.

 

have a read of no.1. below.

 

imho I would be writing back to Barclays demanding the data outside of 6yrs

 

we know they DO have it.

 

see shelley threads.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays didn't send anything for the 1993 & 1995 loans, i guess they don't have anything going back that far or they would have sent them. This means i am unable to complete the spreadsheet as i need the information for loans 1 & 2 as they are part of a chain of 5.

Link to post
Share on other sites

have a read of the relevant threads under this users started threads

 

you'll be surprised what info BC do hold!!

 

Shelley181146 user-offline.png

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barclays have sent me the account numbers for the 1993 & 1995 loans but no statements / agreements therefore I have no details of the amount of the loans and payment made. Surely if they had them they would have sent them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

don't you believe it

 

i'll get someone to pop in.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ragdoll - popping in as asked by Dx.

 

Banks will avoid supplying data if they can, particularly because the older data supplied will end up costing far more than recent data because of interest.

 

Just so you can decide if it's worth fighting for the older data, can you recall roughly what the loan amounts may have been back in 1993 to 1995 and what the PPI rate may have been (perhaps based on the later available data).

 

I doubt a complaint to the ICO will force Barclays to supply data this old.

 

If you want to obtain older data from Barclays, you'll almost certainly have to take court action to force disclosure. This has been done by several CAGgers including Shelley, our own Webmaster, Kate999. See post #130 onwards here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?50148-Barclaycard-amp-Microfiche-they-are-wrong-OFFICIAL&p=3106958&viewfull=1#post3106958

 

I think you have a poor chance of winning a court case for disclosure because of the age of the loan a/c's and the fact that they're long closed.

 

However, Barclays tend to disclose at least some older data to avoid the case actually going into court.

 

While you consider these points, you should send Barclays a letter complaining that they've failed to supply all your data as required by your SAR. See the template here - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/content.php?593-Data-Protection-Act-Non-Compliance-Template-Letters

 

:wink:

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Slick132, letter going off to Barclay first thing tomorrow to see what else they can find.

 

Cannot find anything with regards to the 1993 loan, however I have managed to find some old statement showing the 1995 loan (which was consolidated) from what I can tell I paid £10,372 plus £861.09 which was paid off with loan 3.

 

On the 4th loan I paid £8701 plus £6400.84 which was paid off with loan 5.

 

The only old rate I can find in 1999 which was 13.9%.

 

Let's see what they come up with and then I'll send in the questionnaire.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...