Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Doc 04-19-2024 11-01-51-merged-compressed.pdf good morning.    9 pages attached.    thank you  UCM
    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and thank you for concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My Credit Reports; the good, the bad and the ugly.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3957 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I’ve recently obtained my credit reports from the usual suspects and [perhaps as expected] they vary widely – the thing is they never used to – a couple of years ago when I last got them all 3 agents had roughly the same information, however now they look a bit like this:

 

Experian shows hardly any information, in fact it only records my current account and a settled Vodafone contract from 2009. The concern is that there are 12 pages of searches which include the searches for other active accounts that are not listed in the main report, only the initial search [and hundreds more, many of which I don’t recognise] – is this normal? Could it be that they’ve just not linked the accounts to me when I have applied for the report? I don’t really want to stir up a hornets nest but if lenders can see further accounts when they search me I’d like to know about it.

 

Equifax has all my active accounts - it also shows the 2 defaulted Santander accounts which have been covered here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?357784-Nothing-but-problems-and-charges&p=4186131#post4186131

 

Call Credit has most of my active accounts. There are a couple of defaults which I don’t recognise but they’re set to drop off in the next 6 months so I’ll just let them be. There is also a dirty big CCJ which is covered here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?365588-Unknown-CCJ-cropped-up-againt-old-address.&p=4187917#post4187917

 

So I guess my questions are,

 

• Is it unusual for Experian to only show 3 out of 10 active accounts, should I contact them to see if they have more to link?

• Is it unusual for a CCJ to only show only on one file [CallCredit]?

• Do lenders only see why I see or do they have further details?

 

 

Any insight welcome.

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, There can always be variations on the CRA files held by any of the agencies and there a few reasons for this.

1. Creditors do not always report to ALL the agencies

2. Some creditors it seems use different agencies for different financial products.

3.Some creditors only report to the CRAs IF there is a problem with an account.

4.Some of the companies may be slow reporting to the agencies.

5. The CRAs can be slow in updating and or data gets missed.

 

IMO the CCJ should show on all as a public information notice.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Brig, so RE: the CCJ – who reports/processes it every month? Is it the court or the creditor? i.e. if the CCJ was incorrectly awarded and the [alleged] creditor confirms this, can I ask that they stop processing it and that they make the necessary arrangements to have it officially removed, or do I have to do all the leg work and apply for it to be set-aside etc etc etc.

 

I will address the finer details in a thread I already have on this creditor, but broadly speaking I’m curious as to who processes the CCJ’s status each month.

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

CCJs are reported by the claimant on getting judgement it stays for 6 years, yes if the judgement is wrong the claimant must inform the court, once the CCJ is on file the data is there for 6 years unless/until something like your case comes up.

 

So get on to the claimant and work together, it should save time and costs.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi J,

 

Could you confirm whether the settled account with us showing on your Experian credit file from 2009 also appears on your file with Equifax and Callcredit?

 

If it isn't I'd be happy to get this looked into for you. As such, could you email me with the relevant details via the Contact us form here quoting the code WRT135 - CAG Forum in the subject line?

 

Once sent you'll receive an automated reply with a reference number. To make sure it reaches me could you update the thread with this and I'll get back to you as soon as possible?

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I'm curious too - it makes me feel there's a part if me that's not showing on these reports...

 

...the question is, should I let sleeping dogs lie? I have no issues with the Vodafone account as it was always run fine, I only closed it as o2 have me a better offer. - I'll email you Lee.

 

What I don't want to do is unearth a load of information that I'm going to have spend hours resolving!

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is happening with Equifax quite often recently, may be they are having technical difficulties, but Call Credit is often well behind in displaying data.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi J,

 

Having checked our emails I'm afraid I've been unable to locate yours.

 

Could you update the thread with your email reference number from automated reply so I can check again?

 

In the event that you didn't receive an automated reply could you email me again with a contact number only at [email protected] and again quote the code WRT135 - CAG Forum in the subject line?

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lee - sorry, I only just remembered to do this - the ref is 11386974 - I'm assuming posting this doesn't allow the public to see my personal details.

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi J,

 

Thanks for coming back to me.

 

I've now got your email and will get back to you as soon as I can.

 

Rest assured that the email reference number just enables me to check on the whereabouts of your email and doesn't disclose any of your personal information to anyone else.

 

Kind regards,

 

Lee

 

Web Relations Team

 

Vodafone UK

Link to post
Share on other sites

...update, got the generic email this morning to tell me my updated Noodle file was ready [for what its worth] - low and behold the Vodafone account has showed up in the 'settled' section of the file - I double checked and it wasn't on any of my previous reports form Noodle - my Call Credit file is still 'current' for this month so its not shown up there [yet] - I thought it was odd as Noodle are renowned for being very behind?

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

update:

 

Lee/Vodafone have now confirmed they have been reporting to all 3 CRA with the same information since the account was opened way back when - I think this proves that what you see when you order your file inst necessarily the full picture and I'm not convinced that this is what lenders see - just because we can't see something doesn't mean its not there - whats to say that when the banks conduct a search their results show up differently?

 

hmm

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only differences between the creditor view and yours is in the format of the files and anyone searching the file cannot see that you have checked your file nor can they see tracing searches.

There have been problems at time where data is not kept fully up to date usually my mistake by a creditor or a CRA or both.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Quick update:

 

So as per my first post in this thread, last month I applied for my statutory credit report – it showed 1 active account + 1 settled. This seemed a little light on information so today I thought I’d sign up for credit expert and start probing – had a load of problems getting recognised online so I called the helpdesk – can’t wait for that to hit my mobile bill – anyway long story short they deleted all my details to let me sign up to credit expert.

 

Eventually I got in only to be met by a file that only shows only my current account. Interestingly the well-covered [above] Vodafone account is missing in action – and ironically the worthless credit score has a big red exclamation mark on it that says I could improve my score by having some ‘settled’ accounts on my file! It also says I have 94 linked addressed [which are all made up of variations of the same 5 addressed]

 

So I called up again and asked what was going on only to be told that if I wanted more details to show I’d have to manually add more of my previous address details in – despite the guy on the phone saying he could see historic account information etc…I also said there are 2 address I don’t recognise in my linked addressed and he said “well don’t worry about adding those, you do have historical financial records showing at them but its not negative so you needn’t include it”! – This is hardly how I’d expect a company to act considering they allegedly portray accurate information! – and just because ‘I’m’ not adding these addressed doesn’t stop them being inaccurately there!

 

Given that credit expert costs so much [after the freebie] I’m disappointed that I have to take charge of the level of information that’s on my credit file. A lesser person would have assumed they only had 1 account and been happy with that – the problem I have is that when I call up Experian can clearly see more information that I’m provided with [on both online and paper files] - and I’d bet my bottom dollar that if Experian can see this information then lenders can too – how can I ensure that the most up-to-date information is automatically shown?

 

I feel I should really be able to provide just my name, date of birth, address and the rest should be automatically obtained following a few security questions. Speaking of which, when you sign up they ask you 3 random questions about your credit file – I answered these 3 questions about 3 accounts which were verified as correct answers – yet the accounts they were related too are not showing up!

 

Rant over.

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just name address an date of birth if accepted as the only data proving who a data subject is the CRA would fall far short of the requirements of the DPA1998.

I suggest that you write NOT e-mail the Data Controller at Experian with your concerns.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi - quick question, I’m going through my credit and the painful process of correcting all the errors, mistakes and random things that shouldn't be on their.

 

Is there any reason what the rented flat I live in shows up on my credit file as if it’s a leasehold I my name? – it’s a least hold to the landlord but I’m only a tenant, I’ve never had a leasehold show up for any other flats I’ve lived it – if its harmless it can stay but I suspect that when I apply for a mortgage this will flag up as a problem!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jo, I can only think of one reason for this, maybe a letting agent or the LL has made credit/ID searches on the inception of the tenancy, personally I would take this up with the LL directly.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

the landlord is actually my boss - he's not performed a credit check on me [for work or landlord duties - I've known him for years].

 

Its listed as a property valuation on my Equifax file and just states the year it was brought and the value at the time [which incidentally is wrong].

 

I just can't see understand A] what a property valuation is doing on a credit file, and B] what it has to do with me as it's not my property?

 

Suppose I should call the enemy and see what they've got to say!

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone has aske for a valuation on property possibly owned by you, some ''companies'' will do this if considering statutory demands prior to BR petition, this though seems highly unlikely in your situation though.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...