Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
    • Hi. Please don't follow McD's advice to contact Met to appeal. They won't listen and you could end up giving them helpful information. HB
    • The UK-based mining giant Anglo American says it has received a takeover proposal from Australia's BHP.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide Flex Account charges


Millinx21
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3993 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I have a flex account with Nationwide, that I had used between June 2011 - Dec 2012.

 

I was using the account mainly as a bill paying account, and just transferred money from my main account to pay for bills etc.

 

In Dec 2012 I stopped using the account, as my housemate took over the responsibility for paying the bills etc.

 

In March, out of interest (was desperate for money and hoped to find a bit left), I checked the account, and found it was £15 overdrawn.

 

I called them to ask where the charge came from, as I hadn't used the account in months. They told me that a standing order was returned in December 2012, and that a charge of £15 was added to my account at the end of Jan.

 

Now, I have to admit that I opted for an online statement, and rarely bothered to check it. However, after this charge, I decided to check the account properly, and luckily they had all the statements available online for me to go through them.

 

I found that between June 2011-Dec 2012 they had in fact charged me a total of £235.41! This included 13x Unpaid direct debit and standing order fees of £15 each. 2x Unauthorised overdraft fees of £20 each and 6x Interest charges of £0.41.

 

I just can't believe that within 18 months of use they put £235.41 of charges on my account. A Flex account that shouldn't have an option of going overdrawn.

 

As I am already using this fabulous site for help with an issue for JD Williams, I had a quick look around to see if there was any help available to re-claim bank charges.

 

I was lucky enough to take Lloyds TSB to county court and win over £1500 back from them in bank charges some years ago, but since then I have totally forgotten the actions I took, and reading here rules seem to of changed etc.

 

So, because I have been on long term benefits during the period I used this account, and from reading other peoples comments, I decided to use their secure messaging system to raise the complaint.

 

(I would of entered the exact quote, but online banking is not available at this time :!:)

 

I said that I was in severe financial difficulties, and under the BCOB rule regarding hardship, regulated by the FSA, I was requesting the charges be credited back to my account, to avoid court action.

 

I received a reply today to say that they were sorry I was in financial difficulties, but that my account is being managed by their collections department, and that I would have to ring them directly, to discuss the issue.

 

I have no intention of calling anywhere, especially as I can not record calls, and need thinking time on how to respond to things, so I have composed a letter to send into their complaints department:

 

I am writing to reclaim all the bank charges made on my account since June 2011, when I was in financial hardship, and continue to be so. I am unhappy that these charges have been applied to my account, and in this letter I am registering my complaint and I request that you immediately stop applying further charges to my account.

 

I need you consider my case as a matter of urgency as I believe I am in financial hardship. This is because I am unable to meet priority financial commitments including, but not limited to, council tax, food, rent and utility bills. I have, and remain to be on long term incapacity and DLA benefits since prior to my opening an account with you.

 

I therefore request that you repay all my default charges since June 2011, which total £235.41.

 

I believe that Nationwide has treated me unfairly, under the following BCOB rule, of which Nationwide should be compliant with, since Nationwide is a firm regulated by the FSA.

Rule 5.1.4 G “Principle 6 requires a firm to pay due regard to the interests of its customers and to treat them fairly. In particular, a firm should deal fairly with a banking customer whom it has reason to believe is in financial difficulty.

Under the FSA guidelines, Nationwide has 8 weeks to resolve my complaint. I trust that you will deal with my case within this period. If not, I will refer the matter to the Financial Services Ombudsman.

In order for this claim to be settled without the need for court action I require that the full amount taken of £235.41 be returned to me by way of a credit to my account.

I look forward to receiving a full response to this letter within 14 days

Yours faithfully,

 

 

Basically, I want to know if I am taking the right approach to re-claim these charges, and whether the wording I am using is correct, before I send the letter above?

 

Any help on this would be grately appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

BCOBS

 

see the RBS link

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx,

 

I can't find the link you were referring too, but I did come across this on the website:

 

[insert name and

address of bank]

 

Dear Sir or Madam,

 

Account number: [insert the number of the bank account you are writing to reclaim from]

 

I am writing to request that you repay all the charges in relation to direct debits, unauthorised overdrafts and standing orders that have been applied to my account from the 27 Oct 2012

 

section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992

There is an Act of Parliament which over-rides banks taking charges from your account if you are in receipt of any of the following benefits.

• Income Support

• Tax Credits

• Child Benefit

• Job seekers allowance

• Incapacity benefit

• Disability living allowance

• Attendance Allowance

• CSA payments

• Other DWP payments.

.This includes Rent paid into my account from Ceredigion County Council

These social security benefits are granted to stop hardship and are designed to meet basic day to day needs, and are exempt and are protected under the Social Security Administration Act 1992 sub section 187. from arrestment in terms of section 187 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 (see Enforcement of Civil Obligations in Scotland, Scottish Executive report, at paragraph 5.245).

 

Section 45 of the Tax Credits Act 2002 Chapter 21 part 1 is an identical provision to the said section 187 of the 1992 Act. This stipulates that the banks can not apply any charges to money received as benefit, and any such charges are unlawful and therefore disallowed.

 

Perhaps I could add this into the other letter I wrote?

 

Unless you can give me the link to the part of the RBS section you were talking about, if that works better?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

click the bcobs black underlined anywhere

 

then look for the rbs blue link

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've received a form from Nationwide, asking for details of my Income and Outgoings, including debts and the length of them etc.

 

I know that with most companies, the line is we are not obliged to give them these details, but as this claim refers to hardship, should I send them the details?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I know that with most companies, the line is we are not obliged to give them these details, but as this claim refers to hardship, should I send them the details?

 

Hi,

 

Yes, fill this in and send back as soon as possible, include your original letter, saying that you've enclosed the info as requested.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

p'haps use

creditor 1

creditor 2

etc

 

and approx. values though

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Ok, I finally got a reply from Nationwide today. From my asking them to repay £240ish, they have said they will repay £30.

 

Is there any follow up to this, or just accept the £30 and move on?

Link to post
Share on other sites

really so they decide what is essential and not

 

i'd be asking them to determine what they are going on about

what non essential spending items..

 

seems like a get out to me.

 

still doesn't refer to your BCOBS reference either

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...