Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Absolutely normal.  They do their best to waste your time and also the time of the courts. It doesn't cost them anything.  It costs you and it costs the taxpayer so what do they care?   These are all the reasons why you should not agree to mediation but insist on going to trial.  They will continue to waste your time right off until the trial date and then probably make you an offer.  At least then it won't be in confidence and you can tell them to go and do one if they don't offer you 100% of what you are claiming
    • No, but all you'd do is blindly run the statute barred date for another 18 months. Just sit on your hands until you get a letter of claim, then send a CCA request.  
    • A growing group of conscious consumers have found other strategies to keep companies honest.View the full article
    • Just like last time, Evri requested more time so they have another 2 weeks
    • Just an update, finance company rejected my complaint saying they've found damage but can't tell when it's from even though I've shown them how the front end is misaligned in the advert photos compared to another identical model car they're selling.  Dealership now want to charge me to get the car brought back to me but will only discuss over the phone which seems off. They're also saying no damaged was picked up by JLR main dealership before I purchased it but my local JLR dealerships till this day haven't mentioned the damage to me because they don't go into stuff like that for some reason lol  Ombudsman case is still open, not sure if I should leave the car with them or just pay to have it brought back.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Dementia - Relative Sectioned.


HP Mum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4022 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help

This is really very important and urgent.

A very close relative has dementia.

Spouse today took relative for a Nhs hospital appointment and “apparently” relative became aggressive – threatened to kill the doctor and spouse !!

 

This, of course, is part of the illness - and also because of a current bladder infection which can cause aggression in anyone. Relative is not normally like this.

 

The trouble is that the hospital Doctor “sectioned” relative.

They will now not allow him out of the hospital.

The specialist doctor, to whom he was aggressive, will now not be back in the hospital until Tuesday.

And it seems they can legally – potentially – keep relative in the hospital for months.

 

I just do not know what to do.

But am trying to be practical and quickly ask as many people as possible I know - who work in the medical and legal industry – how we can extract relative from the Nhs hospital system ?? And back into a known environment with a carer.

 

He is in an open ward surrounded by other mentally ill people.

 

Just last week he was staying perfectly well with family, with a carer, in a normal home environment and loving family surrounding him and helping - and was absolutely fine.

 

Family have Power of Attorney over all affairs and physical well-being.

 

But the hospital have "sectioned” relative under a certain Act, stating that relative turned up at the hospital of “own free will” - despite it being for a regular assessment appointment and not for an admission.

Which seems to infer that family - even with Power of Attorney - can do nothing.

 

At this very late hour trying to research all avenues.

 

Can anyone offer advice on the correct steps to take to very quickly extract relative from this distressing environment.

When compos mentis this is the very situation relative demanded family ensured never happened.

 

Can someone help?

Please. xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know which part of the mental health act he has been sectioned under?

The person who is appointed the 'Nearest Relative' has certain*rights and powers when it comes to the care of the person placed under section, which are set out in the Mental Health Act

 

Who has been appointed his nearest relative?

 

The NR can discharge someone from detention under sections 2 or 3, guardianship or a Community Treatment Order (CTO), but not if the person has been detained after a judge or magistrate have made a court order.

I assume if he was detained during a routine appointment - there was no court order?

I would speak to the persons GP, ask for help to discharge. They should support your request.

There is another route you can go down if your discharge is denied, it's called Depravation of Liberty Safeguards, which are in place to protect Alzheimer's patients. Read up on it, it's a recognised care platform which protects people such as your relative.

You could also ring Dementia UK for advice, I did recently and they were great - 0300 222 1122

Good luck x

  • Haha 1

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

You seem to have been through this too !

I have read the links. I think I need to read them more closely.

It seems relative has been sectioned - by a specialist and a random doctor grabbed within the hospital to suit their requirements. Not relative's GP.

Spouse agreed to let hospital keep relative. Thinking it would be a break for a night - not realising it could be up to 6 months or indefinitely. But no papers signed.

Trying to sort it out now.

Maybe need a friendly psychiatrist ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't want to give you the wrong info, but I'm pretty sure that the intial detention under the mental health act, is only for a short period, ie 48hrs or 28 days. They can't detain them for 6 months without further applications. I think the prob is the NR has given her permission and agreed with the DRs that sectioned was the best possible option at the time.

The NR now needs to get the spouse GP on board and also his social worker (get one if they don't have one) to show that he can be cared for at home and that NR is capable, willing and ready to provide that care.

It's big pot of do gooders and know it alls who are all willing to put their tuppence in with not a thought to how it affects families.

 

Spk to Alzheimer's Society, they will give you great advice xx

scotgal 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you

You seem to have been through this too !

I have read the links. I think I need to read them more closely.

It seems relative has been sectioned - by a specialist and a random doctor grabbed within the hospital to suit their requirements. Not relative's GP.

Spouse agreed to let hospital keep relative. Thinking it would be a break for a night - not realising it could be up to 6 months or indefinitely. But no papers signed.

Trying to sort it out now.

Maybe need a friendly psychiatrist ??

 

Further to previous replies : which section of the act is your relative currently held under, and which were they initially held under?.

 

To use some Sections, the Dr has to be a psychiatrist, and "approved". Any Dr can use Section 5 (they don't have to be a psychiatrist nor "approved") but ONLY if they are a designated doctor for that hospital, not just an FY2 who has heard of Section 5.

They also cannot use Section 5(2) for an out-patient or someone in A&E : section 5(2) is applicable only for current in-patients.

 

If 2 Dr's were involved in the initial Section, them it may well have been Section 2 (for assessment)

 

However, if your relative was making threats to kill, if only because of the UTI exacerbating their dementia, wouldn't you want them in hospital? If only to get the UTI treated?

Edited by BazzaS
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • dx100uk changed the title to Dementia - Relative Sectioned.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...