Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
    • Hi and thanks It looks like they ticked all the boxes to me but I'll try and upload the notice. I was wondering if a witness to late delivery might be considered proof - I'm assuming they posted it as normal but Royal Mail stuffed up delivery. If not then they're really saying it just has to be posted within 12 days of the incident, regardless of when it is received. Annoying! edit ok thanks Honeybee here's my 2nd (actually 3rd) attempt at anonymising, copying and uploading the notice! Sorry about the state of it - I sat on it while distracted by my dog 🙃 pcn front.pdf pcn back page.pdf
    • ROFL - dont get upset just because someone (quite a lot of someones) dont want smart meters - well unless you get paid for it .. in which case ...   I assume you haven't been with Octopus long enough to be on one of the very long fixed price tariffs they offered before the prices went bonkers .. and that you dont use your electricity in the evening/lunch time if you think the 'agile type tariffs are good value .. let alone worth installing a smart meter for - high price a good disincentive for an evening cuppa eh? Let alone all your computer/tv etc time in the peak price evening or lunch time. - and boy do those peak prices instantly hammer your bill when those Russian and middle eastern issues kick off.   I would only have considered a smart meter if solar panels had been an option for me - but roof is oriented completely the wrong way. Oh - and My opinion hasn't changed since the smart meter trials 40 years ago, because neither have the issues (well not enough) but I'm happy for you. Be happy for me.
    • Hi. I'm afraid I've had to hide your post with the pdf files to keep this anonymous for you. You've left the PCN reference number and your car reg showing. Could you edit that and repost please? HB    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

legal rights recycling mobile phone - cash4phones.co.uk HELP needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3790 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I sent my brand new blackberry bold 9900 off to cash4phones.co.uk as I got a upgrade to a z10.

It was only a month old from amazon. Neverless cash4phones said it had 'excessive wear and tear' which I disagreed.

They therefore only offered me £50 and told me if i wanted the phone back to pay £8.95.

I paid this and today got the phone back but it has a smashed screen, damaged sim card tray and is not the state i sent it in.

Furthermore there is no battery or charger (which I sent with the item.)

I have emailed cash4phones however what consumer rights do i have?

I've only just done a google search and it seems 1000s if not millions of other customers have had the same thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is a familiar story on this site and in fact we recently assisted someone who had a similar story. He issued legal proceedings and they backed down rather than go to court and paid him his money plus his costs.

 

I think that this is the thread - http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?384007-Cash4phones-Problem&highlight=cash4phones

 

Read it carefully and generally you should follow the advice given there.

Surf the web and get lots of examples of similar complaints and sue the company without hanging around too long.

 

There are so many independent complaints about this that I think action needs to be taken.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please, please, please do not let them get away with this. As above, I took legal action and they backed down. They need to be stopped.

They are screwing over many many people over. Threaten them with legal action, then if they will not back down, do it!

 

Google "Money Claim Online" and see how easy it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi guys. The thing that has upset me is i needed this money for the phone badly, as i'll be completely honest..my mother has cancer. It's been a very hard time for me and she has a severe operation coming up. Therefore i didn't have time to research them.

 

I would have loved to keep this 9900 as I hold personal memories to it (my mother bought it me)..yet thanks to cash4phones they have not only ruined this chance for me..but not only did cash4phones not accept my phone..even thoough at an indepedent phone shop (apart from the smashed screen) i was told the phone was new.

 

I still have my reciept from amazon too. I think that this company overzealousy denies claims so it can (1) earn more money on your phone (2) earn the £8.95 postage fee (at the most i think it probably cost them £5).

 

I am not someone who takes being take advantage of lightly and i've sent them a email to reply in 7 days. If I don't hear from that I will file in the small claims court. speck1965 if you could give me any help i would sincerely appreciate it

Edited by citizenB
Link to post
Share on other sites

I am not going to give you legal advice, I am not qualified, but there will be advice a plenty on here. What I will give you is encouragement and support where I can.

Hope you Mum's operation is helpful.

 

Good luck on all fronts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Cash 4 Phones,

 

I write to you after I recently sent you my Blackberry Bold 9900.

Firstly, you rejected my claim to recycle the phone on the basis that it has excessive wear and tear and is not ‘new’.

I bought the item a month ago from Amazon new and have evidence of this.

Furthermore your quote for £50.00 was extremely inaccurate and poor. RPC Recycling offer £99.00 for Blackberry Bold 9900s even in ‘bad non working condition’.

However I paid your £8.75 return charge. On getting my handset back it has a smashed screen, no battery, no back case/cover and does not have the additional battery or charged I provided with the item.

I have looked through your terms and conditions and nowhere does it state that you will damage customers phones and keep their batteries on return.

In resolution I would like my battery and charger sent to me at your own postage costs and the cost of the repair for the damage caused by your negligence on my phone to be covered.

I will give you 7 days to resolve this issue or I will be forced to take the matter to the Small Claims Court & Trading Standards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have you sent this letter yet?

 

If not, you can do much better

Link to post
Share on other sites

Luckily it is just the LBA. Frankly it was expressed in an overcomplicated way, didn't focus on the issues and contained non-relevant material.

Not to worry.

When it comes to the POC, I suggest that you let us see it first

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I've still heard nothing although i've only emailed them twice and rang in. Promised phonecall back has been 7 days nothing. Emailing again today.

I don't know whats best to do next? I've never written a small claims court case so does anyone have any good links to help you write or advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try this.

 

 

 

The Defendant operates an on-line business and buys used mobile telephones. The claimant sent his pristine Blackberry phone for sale. The Defendant made an unacceptably low offer for the phone. The claimant asked for the phone's return but when it arrived, it was in a badly broken condition.

The claimant is aware of many similar complaints involving the defendants.

The claimant seeks £XXX being the value of the phone in pristine condition.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bankfodder thanks for the help. But I feel maybe im being slightly unfair..do you think i should post cash4phones a letter too? I've sent them emails to both addresses at sales and customer service. Been ignored completely. Telephoned i only 8 times (in last few weeks) and keep being told someone will phone back but never does. Am i being overzealous. Just i'll be honest i don't want to incur a charge of postage and the small claims court say to me that i could have just emailed them and am trying to gain extra money.

All i want is my battery for my phone and for them to repair the damage they've caused which wasn't there before. I'm not asking for anything else

 

Also @Bankfodder is that what I can state in my small claims court claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, of course you must send them an LBA.

I have already post a link to the other thread. That gives yo more detail of what to do.

 

Send them a 14 day LBA and then sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep us informed

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE: Got a recorded letter back after sending Cash4phones my intention to sue letter saying this..

 

Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX,

 

Thank you for your enquiry.

 

If you sent your pack using our freepost envelope, please bear in mind our terms and conditions below:

 

3.6 If the Seller uses the freepost envelope then he does so entirely at his own risk and, subject to Condition (7), the Company does not accept any liability for loss of, damage to or delay to the arrival of the goods. The Seller may, at his own cost, send the Goods to the Company by Royal Mail Special Delivery or other insured courier. The Company will endeavour to record receipt of all incoming post and any such record shall be final evidence of the date the Goods were received by the Company.

 

If you sent your pack using Special delivery, I would advise you to look into making a claim for any loss/damage with the courier.

 

If you do require any further information please contact us via this link http://cash4phones.co.uk/contact-us.aspx

 

Kind regards,

 

Customer Service

Cash 4 Phones

W: http://www.cash4phones.co.uk

 

"The opinions expressed in this email represent the opinions of the individual and not necessarily those of Cash 4 Phones. The contents of this email may be privileged information and/or confidential. If you are not the addressee (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person) please contact the sender and then delete from your system. Do not copy or deliver this email to anyone else, as this may be unlawful. Should you wish to communicate with anyone at Cash 4 Phones by email you consent to us monitoring and reading such correspondence. This email has been scanned by Virus Scan for viruses, but Cash 4 Phones cannot guarantee that every message is free of all viruses. Cash 4 Phones is a trading name for C4PTrading Ltd."

Link to post
Share on other sites

So?

 

Sue

Link to post
Share on other sites

They seem to be assuming it was damaged when you sent it to them, when it was infact damaged when you received it back.

Might be worth reminding them of this?

 

Failing that, as Bankfodder said, Sue. I am fairly confident they will cave in and settle long before the hearing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...