Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the 02/01/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the 19/05/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, 02/06/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Universal Credit's ‘digital by default’ ditched


osdset
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4027 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The government has rowed back on its ‘digital-by-default’ stance on universal credit, which expects the vast majority of benefit applicants to make and update claims online.

 

The government had previously insisted the credit would be “digital by default”, and set a target for 80% of claims to be made online by 2017.

 

The shift comes amid growing concern among senior local government figures about the government-commissioned universal credit IT systems.

 

A second source from one of the ‘pathfinder’ authorities, which are expected to pioneer the new welfare regime, said the technology was “not “fit for purpose”.

 

The department appeared to be “in disarray” as it grappled with the scale of change, the source said, and added that such uncertainty was “alarming” for councils which will be expected to offer face-to-face support for claimants.

 

Source http://www.lgcplus.com/topics/benefits/universal-credits-digital-by-default-ditched/5057200.article?blocktitle=Most-popular&contentID=-1

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Totally expected. Must be nice to be able to think up hare-brained schemes at will, finance them with tax-payers money, then bin them when they don't work..and all with no accountability.

 

As for the bit about 'technology not being fit for purpose', they shouldn't have used Windows Vista to run it. Tut! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Microsoft have problems when they introduce new systems,

what chance has IDS

 

after all

 

It is private contractors with the promise of bug bonus payments trying to get this monstrosity off the ground, but as always, the tax payer will pick up the tab, fail or not

 

Remember that super NHS computer, and the money pumped into that as well, but we do not talk about any more, I wonder why??

Link to post
Share on other sites

..you mean they're re-writing the software to run on Windows 8?? Expect further delays, folks! :)

 

Yes, that's another endearing trait of our government; they never know when to simply quit when something isn't working.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Microsoft are lazy and tightfisted, they get the end user to beta test OS systems then rely on feedback to engineer the service updates, saves them employing testers.

 

The worrying thing with UC is that the DWP will press on with the rollout whether the IT is in place or not. This means everything must be hand processed like it used to be, which was kind of OK back in the day, but the new system relies on processing power to number crunch the data. CPAG had an introductory UC session a while back and feedback from them suggests that even basic benefit calculations under UC done manually will take many hours.

 

It's claimants that will suffer.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, back in the day when I was in DHSS Pensions, it was all hand-done..our most used implement was the stapler; EVERYTHING was on card or paper and there was a staff of 12,000 at the central office I worked at.

 

Good points? Well, we had full employment (in fact it was grossly over-staffed), our own banks on-site, even our own barbers (the DHSS used to work weekends then), a bar in the huge canteen for a lunchtime pint, extended lunch on a Friday to go to the pub and other perks. Plus the job was guaranteed for life; even if you were the worst troublemaker the most they'd do is transfer you to another office (ask me how I know that :) )

, nobody ever got sacked. You just plodded along at your own speed and the job always got done - the good old British Civil Service at it's best!

 

Contrast that with the idiotic schemes they come up with now...somebody give me a time-machine please!

Link to post
Share on other sites

A childhood friend of mine went on to work for the civil service after leaving school. We met up a few years later, he told me that he had left after four years because of the terminal boredom, he would spend his days drawing cartoon sheep for want of something to do.

 

Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges

 

Being poor is like being a Pelican. No matter where you look, all you see is a large bill.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the boredom was the result of having 5 people to do a job which only needed one. Our place had lots of little cafeterias which were open all day so when bored we'd offer to go to the stationery section and get supplies...which was right at the other end of the site and meant we passed 3 or four of these cafes, where we'd nip in and have beans on toast, a mars bar and coffee. Sometimes twice - once on the way there and once coming back! 'Big queue at the stationery section' we'd explain, wiping the chocolate off our mouths..

 

It was the most rule-free, relaxed job I ever had - what a shock I got when I left and started doing 'proper' work!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All this waste of money....and yet they still bang on about the benefits draining the taxpayers...I would love a list of all the money wasting examples like this one and post them everywhere, not just online either, I doubt anyone in power would give a damn but nothing new there I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Biggest waste has to be on computers and software - I read once years back that they spent £200 million on 'new' systems for one year alone..and they didn't work so they were binned.

 

They call the unemployed 'wasters' - we couldn't 'waste' in ten years what the government wastes in one month..or maybe one week. We're far easier to blame though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's very true Nystagmite, and paying taxes on all we buy, and to the local council too...we aren't such a bad lot, in fact the only bad lot is the govt, penalising unemployed when they know damn well there aren't the jobs available, and those that are can easily be out of reach for people like me certainly. Its strange how someone quite interested at the start can be very quickly uninterested when they find that I suffer with Bipolar Disorder, Fibromyalgia and am newly diagnosed Diabetic. Endless symptoms from all three affect me every day. It seems I cant even get any voluntary work, I thought a few hours a week may be good for me and lead to something better, I have just tried to gain some without detailing any illnesses and got an interview for next week. Just a few hours a week. I know I will have to divulge if asked but at least by saying nothing initially I am getting half a chance by being seen at least.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about the waste of money, this will be passed on to the jobseekers. A couple of thousand sanctions here and there and the money is recovered.

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Poundland"

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it will encourage people to be on their guard and provide ample proof of jobseeking so they're not the ones targeted...and hopefully they'll be prepared to complain and make an issue if they are wrongfully picked on.

 

I try and tell as many people about it as I can but there are still loads who are simply not interested in watching out for themselves - these are the ones who will suffer, because the JC will soon spot them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, the boredom was the result of having 5 people to do a job which only needed one. Our place had lots of little cafeterias which were open all day so when bored we'd offer to go to the stationery section and get supplies...which was right at the other end of the site and meant we passed 3 or four of these cafes, where we'd nip in and have beans on toast, a mars bar and coffee. Sometimes twice - once on the way there and once coming back! 'Big queue at the stationery section' we'd explain, wiping the chocolate off our mouths..

 

It was the most rule-free, relaxed job I ever had - what a shock I got when I left and started doing 'proper' work!

 

Rest assured that it is not like that these days. Oh, it's hardly the most demanding job around, but they do actually keep an eye on what you're doing all day. One of my HEOs actually tried to implement a rule that we weren't allowed to go to our colleagues desks to talk about work (well, unless we flexied out). This reduced productivity dramatically so it only lasted a few weeks, but it was indicative of the way these guys think nowadays.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING. EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

The idea that all politicians lie is music to the ears of the most egregious liars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest assured that it is not like that these days. Oh, it's hardly the most demanding job around, but they do actually keep an eye on what you're doing all day. One of my HEOs actually tried to implement a rule that we weren't allowed to go to our colleagues desks to talk about work (well, unless we flexied out). This reduced productivity dramatically so it only lasted a few weeks, but it was indicative of the way these guys think nowadays.

 

Wow, I left over ten years ago, and though not like in jasta'a time, it wasn't quite that harsh. But we were getting into targets for processing, and our 'boxes' were closely monitored by the EO's. And taking sick leave meant having an interrogation under bright lights in the HEO's office, and we'd get a stern talking to for being 30 seconds late - I got in one day, the bus was late and took my coat off and sat down, the EO came over and said 'this is the second time you've been late in two weeks, you came in the same time last Tuesday', I had to be there by 9.30 and I looked at the clock on my computer and it was 9.31, these were the only two times I was late - I started going in for 8.30 just to be safe. But the fraud team spent an awful lot of time in the pub and had a much more relaxed environment, so maybe it depended on the boss.

We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office ~ Aesop

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder when all this discipline in the DHSS/DWP suddenly kicked in then? Overnight, it seems! I think there's only a few hundred working at my old place now, rather than the 12,000 when I was there - in fact, most of the site has been sold off or demolished and grassed-over. Says it all really, doesn't it.

 

Oh, and while I worked there, we had guys standing outside the gates selling the 'Morning Star'..a communist newspaper at the time - don't know if it's still going. A lot of staff bought it too - do that today and you'd probably be invited to an internal 'interview' to discuss your political views...

Edited by jasta11
Link to post
Share on other sites

What happens to people whose disabilities mean they can't use a computer / internet? It's a reasonable adjustment to provide different ways of applying for stuff.

That's why IDS is heading for his downfall. He is not liked by his own party. He is going down a road that only leads to his downfall, His party is only to happy wait. What happens to the people who really need help?

They don't care, it's inter party politics,no more no less.

regards

pitcher

Awop-Bop-A-Loo-Mop-Alop-Bam-Boom. ~ Little Richard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have basic knowledge in using a computer, but unfortunately I wont be able to pay for internet much longer, my payments for that are now being used to pay council tax, which is fine if that's what I have to do so be it as they couldn't give a flying f*** what I think anyway, but it means I wouldn't be able to do job search at home, nearest seetect to me is about £8 maybe more fare per round trip by bus, so if they force me onto that it will cost more in fares than the amount I have to pay council tax. so they make me pay £4.55 approx. per week for council tax and the fares to seetec would be £8 for one trip ......but then I guess seetec pay that out of their millions of pounds the govt give them to do a poor job and not achieve much....hmmmm fantastic logic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...